BanndNDC wrote:Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:[ The way to win is to make shots. After that, a team that rebounds well wins.
sounds like one Antawn Jamison to me.
Boozer's defense has been crap for years. He is an absolutely horrendous and selfish team defender. His attitude, basically the character traits he showed in the whole cle/utak ordeal, is not something id want around our youngsters (especially someone like blatche). He will never be a winner and is way too me first for a let's start over team.
im assuming you are like the rest of us and thought jamison was overpaid.
boozer is very similar as a player to jamison, solid rebounder and offensive game combined with a horrible defensive game. the idea of paying boozer even more (without the upstanding community citizen part) seems quite odd to me.
overpaying for an aging me first player with no defense would have been a terrible way to start the leonsis era. i agree with you on the need and importance of rebounding (and desperately wanted to move up to draft patterson) but boozer was not the way to solve that problem any more than AJ was.
Antawn Per-36 min, career: 19.4 pts,
7.9 rebs, 1.7 asts,
.456 FG%, .
.526TS% Jamison career PER:
18.6http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... san01.htmlCarlos Per-36 min, career: 19.0 pts,
11.2 rebs, 2.5 asts, .
541 FG%,
.577 TS%Boozer career PER:
20.8http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... eca01.htmlBoozer's a tremendous rebounder. Much, much better than Jamison, who's merely better-than average on the boards.
He's a lot more efficient scoring on the low block. Jamison's got more range, but that's the only way he's better than Boozer. Overall, Carlos is a considerably better player. At 29, I'd hardly say Boozer's aging to the point he'll be in decline any of the next 3 years, either.
Boozer's a better player by far than Antawn. He's probably NOT a max player, but I would have gone that route with him and Cousins because I don't think anybody could stop them inside in the playoffs.