ImageImageImage

Realgm Grades the Beasley and Ridnour Deals (from main page)

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

User avatar
Breakdown777
Veteran
Posts: 2,759
And1: 47
Joined: Sep 17, 2009
Location: MN

Realgm Grades the Beasley and Ridnour Deals (from main page) 

Post#1 » by Breakdown777 » Thu Jul 22, 2010 6:34 pm

I didn't see this posted anywhere, so I thought I'd start a thread about it.

http://timberwolves.realgm.com/articles/96/20100720/grading_the_deal_wolves_add_beasley_ridnour/

Beasley gets: B
Wolves get: A
Heat get: C+

Ridnour gets: B
Wolves get: D+
"Llevaré mi talento a Minnesota".
JasonL
Freshman
Posts: 78
And1: 7
Joined: Jul 14, 2010
       

Re: Realgm Grades the Beasley and Ridnour Deals (from main page) 

Post#2 » by JasonL » Fri Jul 23, 2010 2:05 am

meh

ridnour deal deserves a F
User avatar
Foye
Club Captain- German Soccer
Posts: 25,057
And1: 3,613
Joined: Jul 29, 2008
Location: Frankfurt
 

Re: Realgm Grades the Beasley and Ridnour Deals (from main page) 

Post#3 » by Foye » Fri Jul 23, 2010 1:41 pm

JasonL wrote:meh

ridnour deal deserves a F


You're right. :cry:
User avatar
eyeteeth
Starter
Posts: 2,109
And1: 147
Joined: Jul 17, 2010
Location: somewhere on the Front Range

Re: Realgm Grades the Beasley and Ridnour Deals (from main page) 

Post#4 » by eyeteeth » Fri Jul 23, 2010 1:58 pm

Eh, the Ridnour signing will be something we can evaluate in Jan, when we know a) if he's enthusiastic about playing here b) how well he can run the 1/2triangle-or-whatever that the Wolves run, and c) if his shooting last year was a fluke. Until we know these answers it's just pissing in the wind to "evaluate" the trade one way or the other.

Clearly Kahn and Rambis weren't satisfied with Sessions, so they went and got Ridnour. Makes enough sense to me.
Image
Dewey
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,898
And1: 1,070
Joined: May 22, 2001

Re: Realgm Grades the Beasley and Ridnour Deals (from main page) 

Post#5 » by Dewey » Fri Jul 23, 2010 2:00 pm

JasonL wrote:meh

ridnour deal deserves a F


Meh ... Ridnour bails us out of the Session deal ... I'd call it atleast a B for the Wolves.
Flip response to Love wanting out, "He has no reason to be upset, you're either a part of the problem or a part of the solution"
User avatar
Foye
Club Captain- German Soccer
Posts: 25,057
And1: 3,613
Joined: Jul 29, 2008
Location: Frankfurt
 

Re: Realgm Grades the Beasley and Ridnour Deals (from main page) 

Post#6 » by Foye » Fri Jul 23, 2010 2:38 pm

Dewey wrote:
JasonL wrote:meh

ridnour deal deserves a F


Meh ... Ridnour bails us out of the Session deal ... I'd call it atleast a B for the Wolves.


I wouldn't call collecting 3rd tier PG's a B. :dontknow:
Dewey
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,898
And1: 1,070
Joined: May 22, 2001

Re: Realgm Grades the Beasley and Ridnour Deals (from main page) 

Post#7 » by Dewey » Fri Jul 23, 2010 3:19 pm

Foye wrote:
Dewey wrote:
JasonL wrote:meh

ridnour deal deserves a F


Meh ... Ridnour bails us out of the Session deal ... I'd call it atleast a B for the Wolves.


I wouldn't call collecting 3rd tier PG's a B. :dontknow:


see the bigger picture ... 3-1 = 2 :o
Flip response to Love wanting out, "He has no reason to be upset, you're either a part of the problem or a part of the solution"
funkatron101
General Manager
Posts: 7,741
And1: 1,177
Joined: Jan 02, 2008
Location: St. Paul

Re: Realgm Grades the Beasley and Ridnour Deals (from main page) 

Post#8 » by funkatron101 » Fri Jul 23, 2010 3:20 pm

Seems like a fair grade.
User avatar
Foye
Club Captain- German Soccer
Posts: 25,057
And1: 3,613
Joined: Jul 29, 2008
Location: Frankfurt
 

Re: Realgm Grades the Beasley and Ridnour Deals (from main page) 

Post#9 » by Foye » Fri Jul 23, 2010 3:47 pm

Dewey wrote:
see the bigger picture ... 3-1 = 2 :o


You have to get rid of Sessions first before you can subtract him. We should've just kept Sessions and not added Ridnour. Ridnour won't be much better than Sessions was last season playing behind Jonny Flynn.
Dewey
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,898
And1: 1,070
Joined: May 22, 2001

Re: Realgm Grades the Beasley and Ridnour Deals (from main page) 

Post#10 » by Dewey » Fri Jul 23, 2010 4:18 pm

Foye wrote:
Dewey wrote:
see the bigger picture ... 3-1 = 2 :o


You have to get rid of Sessions first before you can subtract him. We should've just kept Sessions and not added Ridnour. Ridnour won't be much better than Sessions was last season playing behind Jonny Flynn.


He'll be better. Better shooter, better ball-handler, and better passer while the defense and contracts are about the same. We would not have signed Ridnour without intentions of trading Sessions. We've hung on to Sessions to make sure Flynn's hip is okay before signing the dotted line. Kahn has basically made this public.
Flip response to Love wanting out, "He has no reason to be upset, you're either a part of the problem or a part of the solution"
Child of Wonder
Freshman
Posts: 98
And1: 27
Joined: Dec 14, 2006

Re: Realgm Grades the Beasley and Ridnour Deals (from main page) 

Post#11 » by Child of Wonder » Fri Jul 23, 2010 4:23 pm

So what happens next year when we bring Rubio over?

Assuming Rubio gets 30 mpg, that leaves 18 minutes for Flynn and Ridnour.
Dewey
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,898
And1: 1,070
Joined: May 22, 2001

Re: Realgm Grades the Beasley and Ridnour Deals (from main page) 

Post#12 » by Dewey » Fri Jul 23, 2010 5:07 pm

Child of Wonder wrote:So what happens next year when we bring Rubio over?

Assuming Rubio gets 30 mpg, that leaves 18 minutes for Flynn and Ridnour.


So what... that's next year. Weed out the weak when/if that time comes..
Flip response to Love wanting out, "He has no reason to be upset, you're either a part of the problem or a part of the solution"
User avatar
Saltine
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,396
And1: 1,002
Joined: Jul 20, 2003
Location: Land o' Lakes
     

Re: Realgm Grades the Beasley and Ridnour Deals (from main page) 

Post#13 » by Saltine » Fri Jul 23, 2010 5:15 pm

one of them get traded, probably flynn.
moss_is_1
RealGM
Posts: 10,971
And1: 2,385
Joined: May 20, 2009
   

Re: Realgm Grades the Beasley and Ridnour Deals (from main page) 

Post#14 » by moss_is_1 » Fri Jul 23, 2010 6:48 pm

Child of Wonder wrote:So what happens next year when we bring Rubio over?

Assuming Rubio gets 30 mpg, that leaves 18 minutes for Flynn and Ridnour.

I hope Flynn is traded. Ridnour can also play the 2 guard some, as he did with Brandon Jennings this season.
User avatar
Breakdown777
Veteran
Posts: 2,759
And1: 47
Joined: Sep 17, 2009
Location: MN

Re: Realgm Grades the Beasley and Ridnour Deals (from main page) 

Post#15 » by Breakdown777 » Fri Jul 23, 2010 7:00 pm

I think that there are still hopes that Flynn and Rubio can play together. I see Flynn like a Jason Terry that plays mostly PG instead of mostly the SG, there maybe there are more minutes for Flynn. Plus, next year, he'll have two seasons of experience with the system, which I think the FO would like to hold onto unless Flynn could get us a nice package.
User avatar
eyeteeth
Starter
Posts: 2,109
And1: 147
Joined: Jul 17, 2010
Location: somewhere on the Front Range

Re: Realgm Grades the Beasley and Ridnour Deals (from main page) 

Post#16 » by eyeteeth » Fri Jul 23, 2010 8:08 pm

Breakdown777 wrote:I think that there are still hopes that Flynn and Rubio can play together. I see Flynn like a Jason Terry that plays mostly PG instead of mostly the SG, there maybe there are more minutes for Flynn. Plus, next year, he'll have two seasons of experience with the system, which I think the FO would like to hold onto unless Flynn could get us a nice package.

Haven't we been through this, though? How on earth does he defend NBA 2-guards while standing 6' tall? And if they just switch off on D, OK, but then he still has to shoot over guys 5-6" taller than he does..

I'm not against 2 PGs in principle; it could work. But is Jonny the guy? I doubt it.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,292
And1: 19,304
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Realgm Grades the Beasley and Ridnour Deals (from main page) 

Post#17 » by shrink » Fri Jul 23, 2010 8:12 pm

Dewey wrote:
Child of Wonder wrote:So what happens next year when we bring Rubio over?

Assuming Rubio gets 30 mpg, that leaves 18 minutes for Flynn and Ridnour.


So what... that's next year. Weed out the weak when/if that time comes..


You can't just "so what?" this question. We are playing for next year. We chose to pay Luke Ridnour $16 mil through 2014. If he reverts back to the medicority he's shown for most of his career, what exactly are you prepared to give up to move his salary off this team?

The Cow has it right here - every move should be based on the assumption that rubio is coming over.
Buckeye-NBAFan
General Manager
Posts: 8,119
And1: 4,806
Joined: Jun 25, 2004

Re: Realgm Grades the Beasley and Ridnour Deals (from main page) 

Post#18 » by Buckeye-NBAFan » Fri Jul 23, 2010 11:05 pm

Dewey wrote:
Child of Wonder wrote:So what happens next year when we bring Rubio over?

Assuming Rubio gets 30 mpg, that leaves 18 minutes for Flynn and Ridnour.


So what... that's next year. Weed out the weak when/if that time comes..


So the Wolves should sign Ridnour to a 4 year deal on a non-playoff team so that they can turn around and sign Rubio next year, meaning they'll once again be forced to look to dump a PG they don't want a year after they signed him?
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Realgm Grades the Beasley and Ridnour Deals (from main page) 

Post#19 » by Krapinsky » Fri Jul 23, 2010 11:13 pm

Buckeye-NBAFan wrote:
Dewey wrote:
Child of Wonder wrote:So what happens next year when we bring Rubio over?

Assuming Rubio gets 30 mpg, that leaves 18 minutes for Flynn and Ridnour.


So what... that's next year. Weed out the weak when/if that time comes..


So the Wolves should sign Ridnour to a 4 year deal on a non-playoff team so that they can turn around and sign Rubio next year, meaning they'll once again be forced to look to dump a PG they don't want a year after they signed him?


If Rubio gets 30 mpg that still only leaves 18 for Flynn even without Ridnour.

Writing on the wall: either Rubio or Flynn will be traded next year (probably Flynn). The Ridnour signing is irrelevent to that decision and merely assures us of a capable veteran back up for the foreseeable future.
shangrila
RealGM
Posts: 13,511
And1: 6,584
Joined: Dec 21, 2009
Location: Land of Aus
 

Re: Realgm Grades the Beasley and Ridnour Deals (from main page) 

Post#20 » by shangrila » Fri Jul 23, 2010 11:41 pm

Yeah I think it's clear one of Flynn or Rubio are gone now. I believed Kahn when he said he thought they could play together but Rambis is violently opposed to playing guys out of position so it won't be happening with him on the bench.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves