victor page wrote:It's simple. Offensive production is much cheaper at first base than any other position (except perhaps DH). Small or mid market teams need offense out of those positions, because they aren't often getting dynamic offense out of the positions in the middle of the field (catcher, short, second and centre). Aaron Hill's 2009 notwithstanding, you usually have to pay productive offensive players that can play these positions insane amounts of money.
Offensive production most certainly isn't cheaper at first base, it's just more common. Last year an all-hit, no-field Carlos Pena -- 39 HRs, 91 RBI, 570 PAs -- was worth 2.7 wins above replacement...Overbay was worth 2.4 WAR, and that was in 500 PAs. On a per-PA basis, Overbay actually edged Pena out in value by the smallest of margins. And Pena definitely would've gotten the bigger contract had both gone to free agency after the season, because teams an overly enamoured with positional niches.
Often teams like the Yankees and Red Sox can afford to carry an all glove first baseman because they have a ton of production elsewhere. I think Doug Mientklewicz was the Sox starter in 2004 when they won the Series. Before Texeira and after Giambi put away his glove, the Yanks had some stiff at first too.
As do we; we have the fourth most productive offense in the American League by OPS+, though we're a little lower (though above league average) in runs scored, in no small part because we get on base at an extraordinarily pathetic rate, which means a good deal of our power goes for naught. None of that is Overbay's fault, given that he's third on the team in OBP despite having an unusually bad year in that department.
Overbay's defensive numbers are good (apparently) but he does seem to boot the big one doesn't he?
No, he doesn't. Again, a couple errors in crucial situations will burn themselves into your consciousness far more than the ones that he scoops. That's natural (no one remembers the unremarkable), but it doesn't suggest a pattern.
I have to take your word that Overbay is hitting well in the clutch this season. I'm not sure what the definition of "high leverage" is. Anecdotally, he seems to go down looking way, way too often in key situations.
Key word: anecdotally. As I said, people tend to remember the things that cause an emotional response, and striking out in key situations provokes more of a response than banging out a hit.
And the "O" in Lyle's OPS seems to come predominantly from walks and base hits in extremely low leverage situations. In an 6 run + game, he's like Ted Williams up there.
Except for the stats that I just posted which shows that he gets on base at a nearly .400 clip in high-leverage situations.
I'd be exceptionally surprised if Lyle ever lands a starting job in the majors after his contract ends.
Depends on your definition of a starting job...I've been arguing for a couple years that Overbay is best in a platoon, because he's very good against right-handed pitching. I have no doubt that he'll get 500 plate appearances somewhere next year, and for probably three years thereafter.