James Johnson for Chuck Wagon Hayes

wadero · Post #1 » by **wadero** » Thu Jul 29, 2010 3:19 pm

Would guys do this trade Chuck and a future 2nd( the one we got from Toronto) for James Johnson? A good friend of mine said he heard talk on Chicago Radio station? ( Dont know if it BS) Just wanted to see what you guys think.

Sasaki · Post #2 » by **Sasaki** » Thu Jul 29, 2010 3:31 pm

Who? And I like keeping Chuck around, I think he needs to be around to be a mentor to Hill and Patterson.

HTown_TMac · Post #3 » by **HTown_TMac** » Thu Jul 29, 2010 3:53 pm

James Johnson was good at Wake Forest.. idk now much about him now

x- · Post #4 » by x- » Thu Jul 29, 2010 4:19 pm

moofs · Post #5 » by **moofs** » Thu Jul 29, 2010 5:51 pm

One day, I will figure out what triggered this board's attitude toward Chuck Hayes to change.

It certainly wasn't me.

King_James6 · Post #6 » by **King_James6** » Thu Jul 29, 2010 7:24 pm

Hell to the no.

Post #7 » by **Mr. E** » Thu Jul 29, 2010 8:35 pm

James Johnson has upside, but at this moment in time I would not do that deal. We already have two big man projects in Hill & Patterson. Truck, all 6'6" of him, may not be the ideal center off the bench, but at least we know what he can provide, and that he can provide it well.

rocketsballin · Post #8 » by **rocketsballin** » Thu Jul 29, 2010 8:45 pm

hayes AND a 2nd round pick? do u even know who chuck hayes is? he's so good at defense that he covers 1/4 of this world by himself, the other 3/4 is covered by water. its a daam shame the basketball gods didnt fix his height at 6'10, coulda been a multiple DPOY beast.

plus, we got enough undersized bigs, we need that big black guy to protect the paint, not a 6'9 guy to help rebound and put up 5 pts a game

. there's no need for james over here, we got enough wings and bigs. wat we need is a 2nd all star and a 6'11 250lb defensive beast

btw, hayes is in his prime, we should keep him for at least 5 more years

Guy986 · Post #9 » by **Guy986** » Thu Jul 29, 2010 11:42 pm

Johnson will just rot on the bench. The Truck will actually contribute...

M4P · Post #10 » by **M4P** » Fri Jul 30, 2010 12:09 am

Johnson was dead weight for Chicago last year. We already have too many wings as it is anyway.

Moreyball · Post #11 » by **Moreyball** » Fri Jul 30, 2010 9:30 am

no.

noah and a second. maybe.

panthermark · Post #12 » by **panthermark** » Fri Jul 30, 2010 3:03 pm

Moreyball wrote:no.

noah and a second. maybe.

But for real...

I wanted the Bulls to send Johnson for David Andersen...

KiDdFrESh · Post #13 » by **KiDdFrESh** » Fri Jul 30, 2010 5:18 pm

I'd trade him for Jordan Hill.