Prove to me Derrick Rose is Good.
Moderators: cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid
Re: Prove to me Derrick Rose is Good.
-
tcduke
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,441
- And1: 1
- Joined: Jul 02, 2010
Re: Prove to me Derrick Rose is Good.
you're not mad but almost all of your posts resolve to name calling? that's childish
Re: Prove to me Derrick Rose is Good.
-
DanielBoone
- Banned User
- Posts: 506
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 09, 2010
Re: Prove to me Derrick Rose is Good.
so we're allowed to shift time and exclude bad games only when it helps Rose. Oh I wasnt aware of that, sorry. hurr durr.
by the way to bulls fans claiming NOW the team around Rose last year sucked, before the playoffs you all claimed they were super underrated and the only reason they didnt win 55 games was injuries.
you cant have it both ways and morph your current and past opinions to fit your agenda. pathetic
by the way to bulls fans claiming NOW the team around Rose last year sucked, before the playoffs you all claimed they were super underrated and the only reason they didnt win 55 games was injuries.
you cant have it both ways and morph your current and past opinions to fit your agenda. pathetic
Re: Prove to me Derrick Rose is Good.
-
DanielBoone
- Banned User
- Posts: 506
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 09, 2010
Re: Prove to me Derrick Rose is Good.
tcduke wrote:you're not mad but almost all of your posts resolve to name calling? that's childish
now that the bulls homers are clearly trying to divert the topic away since they cant make any real points or arguments (because the numbers dont back you up, not your fault) I'm gonna go ahead and chalk this one up as a victory to myself and leave. me 1-0 bulls homers. good game, i'm out
Re: Prove to me Derrick Rose is Good.
- Rerisen
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 105,369
- And1: 25,052
- Joined: Nov 23, 2003
Re: Prove to me Derrick Rose is Good.
DanielBoone wrote:so we're allowed to shift time and exclude bad games only when it helps Rose.
No one is excluding them. I'm saying the last (54 really) NBA games he's played, Rose has been a beast.
Therefore, its pretty easy to predict he's going to keep on being that and only get better this year as he's 21.
Gilbert hasn't been a beast in 3 years. Hasn't even played consistently in 3 years. See the difference?
Re: Prove to me Derrick Rose is Good.
-
tcduke
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,441
- And1: 1
- Joined: Jul 02, 2010
Re: Prove to me Derrick Rose is Good.
DanielBoone wrote:so we're allowed to shift time and exclude bad games only when it helps Rose. Oh I wasnt aware of that, sorry. hurr durr.
by the way to bulls fans claiming NOW the team around Rose last year sucked, before the playoffs you all claimed they were super underrated and the only reason they didnt win 55 games was injuries.
you cant have it both ways and morph your current and past opinions to fit your agenda. pathetic
You've been the one conveniently ignoring that Arenas hasn't played anything close to a season in 3 years. If it's ok to judge Arenas performance based on 32 games last season, it should be ok to do that to Rose post all star break. You can't have it both ways and morph your current and past opinions to fit your agenda. pathetic.
Re: Prove to me Derrick Rose is Good.
-
tcduke
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,441
- And1: 1
- Joined: Jul 02, 2010
Re: Prove to me Derrick Rose is Good.
DanielBoone wrote:tcduke wrote:you're not mad but almost all of your posts resolve to name calling? that's childish
now that the bulls homers are clearly trying to divert the topic away since they cant make any real points or arguments (because the numbers dont back you up, not your fault) I'm gonna go ahead and chalk this one up as a victory to myself and leave. me 1-0 bulls homers. good game, i'm out
You've been ignoring every valid point made against your opinion, but whatever floats your boat dude.
Re: Prove to me Derrick Rose is Good.
- Rerisen
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 105,369
- And1: 25,052
- Joined: Nov 23, 2003
Re: Prove to me Derrick Rose is Good.
DanielBoone wrote:i'm out
Should have saved us the trouble and never came in, as all you've done is troll and make vapid comments.
Re: Prove to me Derrick Rose is Good.
- joeyAdaMan
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,048
- And1: 2,145
- Joined: Jun 25, 2010
- Location: Philly dawg
-
Re: Prove to me Derrick Rose is Good.
DanielBoone wrote:tcduke wrote:you're not mad but almost all of your posts resolve to name calling? that's childish
now that the bulls homers are clearly trying to divert the topic away since they cant make any real points or arguments (because the numbers dont back you up, not your fault) I'm gonna go ahead and chalk this one up as a victory to myself and leave. me 1-0 bulls homers. good game, i'm out
cocky little biatch
Volcano wrote:Kobe must the best at everything. He's faster than Westbrook and stronger than Dwight. He's taller than Yao Ming and shorter than Earl Boykins. Nothing you say is going to change their minds.
Re: Prove to me Derrick Rose is Good.
-
Legendary 33
- Banned User
- Posts: 6,391
- And1: 3
- Joined: Jan 24, 2009
- Location: On top of the Central Division
Re: Prove to me Derrick Rose is Good.
DanielBoone wrote:
so we're allowed to shift time and exclude bad games only when it helps Rose. Oh I wasnt aware of that, sorry. hurr durr.
1) But we're allowed to exclude the fact that Gilbert's been a shell of himself for the past 3 seasons, and only played 20something games before pulling a gun on a teammate?
2) Unlike Gilbert, Rose is actually capable of playing through an injury. He doesn't miss entire seasons for some b.s. reason. Rose proclaimed himself healthy to the media some random day late December, and since then we've tracked his statistics: He's basically been 23, 6, and 4 on over .560 TS% and a PER of 21-22. That stat line puts him in the same sentence as Brandon Roy and a sophomore Dwayne Wade, not a washed up Gilbert.
by the way to bulls fans claiming NOW the team around Rose last year sucked, before the playoffs you all claimed they were super underrated and the only reason they didnt win 55 games was injuries.
No, we've always claimed they've sucked, and the statistics prove it. Kirk Hinrich and his TS% of of 50.1% sure do a lot for the Bulls. Most of us didn't even expect to make the playoffs, but yeah keep stereotyping all Bulls fans
Re: Prove to me Derrick Rose is Good.
- Jvaughn
- RealGM
- Posts: 28,140
- And1: 4,693
- Joined: May 18, 2009
-
Re: Prove to me Derrick Rose is Good.
tcduke wrote:DanielBoone wrote:so we're allowed to shift time and exclude bad games only when it helps Rose. Oh I wasnt aware of that, sorry. hurr durr.
by the way to bulls fans claiming NOW the team around Rose last year sucked, before the playoffs you all claimed they were super underrated and the only reason they didnt win 55 games was injuries.
you cant have it both ways and morph your current and past opinions to fit your agenda. pathetic
You've been the one conveniently ignoring that Arenas hasn't played anything close to a season in 3 years. If it's ok to judge Arenas performance based on 32 games last season, it should be ok to do that to Rose post all star break. You can't have it both ways and morph your current and past opinions to fit your agenda. pathetic.
Beautiful. Thank you for pointing out the hypocrisy.
spearsy23 wrote:Kobe is a low percentage chucker just like Jennings, he's just better at it.
teamCHItown wrote:Now we have threads on what violent felons think of our Bulls. Great. Next up, OJ Simpson's take on a possible Taj Gibson extension.
Re: Prove to me Derrick Rose is Good.
-
Wizardspride
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,417
- And1: 11,596
- Joined: Nov 05, 2004
- Location: Olney, MD/Kailua/Kaneohe, HI
-
Re: Prove to me Derrick Rose is Good.
Legendary 33 wrote:
1) But we're allowed to exclude the fact that Gilbert's been a shell of himself for the past 3 seasons, and only played 20something games before pulling a gun on a teammate?![]()
2) Unlike Gilbert, Rose is actually capable of playing through an injury. He doesn't miss entire seasons for some b.s. reason. Rose proclaimed himself healthy to the media some random day late December, and since then we've tracked his statistics: He's basically been 23, 6, and 4 on over .560 TS% and a PER of 21-22. That stat line puts him in the same sentence as Brandon Roy and a sophomore Dwayne Wade, not a washed up Gilbert.
I might be wrong but I'll assume that you didn't see Gil play very much.
I otoh, saw every single game he played in last season and he's far from being "washed up".
And in fact,as the season went on he was starting to look more and more like his old self.
PS:Gil did not "pull" a gun on a teammate.
Re: Prove to me Derrick Rose is Good.
- Miklo
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 7,674
- And1: 278
- Joined: Jan 23, 2005
- Location: North Carolina
-
Re: Prove to me Derrick Rose is Good.
This thread is getting ridiculous. Daniel Boone you need to stop lacing your posts with personal attacks and flaming in general. Everyone else, please don't lower yourselves to that level in responding - you're exposing yourself to the risk of a warning just as much as he is when you resort to personal attacks.
Everyone has been warned now, further drama will be handled dramatically.
Thanks
Everyone has been warned now, further drama will be handled dramatically.
Thanks
Re: Prove to me Derrick Rose is Good.
-
DaeDae
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,228
- And1: 661
- Joined: Mar 11, 2010
Re: Prove to me Derrick Rose is Good.
This thread is full of epic fail! Did someone really decide to score the debate and declare himself the winner? 
Red Larrivee wrote:The Bulls have too many untouchables for a team without a second option.
Re: Prove to me Derrick Rose is Good.
-
redshortz
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 885
- And1: 3
- Joined: Jul 30, 2009
Re: Prove to me Derrick Rose is Good.
wow, anyways...
I don't really see what Bulls fans are getting riled up for. Derrick Rose is an awesome talent in this league, and quite frankly his game really speaks for itself. Don't dignify these haters with a response as to why this kid is sick! Quite frankly, I'm very surprised a thread like this was created to begin with...
"prove to me Derrick Rose is good"? The proof is right in front of your face.
I don't really see what Bulls fans are getting riled up for. Derrick Rose is an awesome talent in this league, and quite frankly his game really speaks for itself. Don't dignify these haters with a response as to why this kid is sick! Quite frankly, I'm very surprised a thread like this was created to begin with...
"prove to me Derrick Rose is good"? The proof is right in front of your face.
Re: Prove to me Derrick Rose is Good.
-
jcuuofd
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,123
- And1: 511
- Joined: Dec 12, 2004
Re: Prove to me Derrick Rose is Good.
This thread is 24 pages of trolling.
No one kicks a dead dog. If Rose was not good people would not feel the need to trash him.
No one kicks a dead dog. If Rose was not good people would not feel the need to trash him.
Re: Prove to me Derrick Rose is Good.
-
Legendary 33
- Banned User
- Posts: 6,391
- And1: 3
- Joined: Jan 24, 2009
- Location: On top of the Central Division
Re: Prove to me Derrick Rose is Good.
Wizardspride wrote:Legendary 33 wrote:
1) But we're allowed to exclude the fact that Gilbert's been a shell of himself for the past 3 seasons, and only played 20something games before pulling a gun on a teammate?![]()
2) Unlike Gilbert, Rose is actually capable of playing through an injury. He doesn't miss entire seasons for some b.s. reason. Rose proclaimed himself healthy to the media some random day late December, and since then we've tracked his statistics: He's basically been 23, 6, and 4 on over .560 TS% and a PER of 21-22. That stat line puts him in the same sentence as Brandon Roy and a sophomore Dwayne Wade, not a washed up Gilbert.
I might be wrong but I'll assume that you didn't see Gil play very much.
I otoh, saw every single game he played in last season and he's far from being "washed up".
And in fact,as the season went on he was starting to look more and more like his old self.
PS:Gil did not "pull" a gun on a teammate.
It doesn't matter. 28 games is still not a large enough sample size. If we're using selective games to pick out, we should use Rose's last 54 games where he played injury free..23 6 and 4 on better efficiency, better PER and on a better team is better than anything Gil did this season
Re: Prove to me Derrick Rose is Good.
- LarsV8
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,351
- And1: 5,780
- Joined: Dec 13, 2009
-
Re: Prove to me Derrick Rose is Good.
You can put me in the Rose is overated camp. He is certainly a good player, but I think he is fool's gold as far as a franchise guy. He reminds me a ton of Steve Francis, and Stevie was a much better defender. I think he picked up a ton of hype coming from being the number one guy in a very weak draft and sustained it by being high usage and flashy.
When I watch him play I see a guy who will flourish in his youth but falter after he starts losing his athleticism and quickness. I dont think he is smart or basketball savy enough to adjust his game.
In my opinion, he is the fifth best PG in the league but the gap between him and tier above (Nash, Dwill, Rondo, C3) is much larger than the tier below (Billups, Brooks, Curry, Westbrook)
When I watch him play I see a guy who will flourish in his youth but falter after he starts losing his athleticism and quickness. I dont think he is smart or basketball savy enough to adjust his game.
In my opinion, he is the fifth best PG in the league but the gap between him and tier above (Nash, Dwill, Rondo, C3) is much larger than the tier below (Billups, Brooks, Curry, Westbrook)
Re: Prove to me Derrick Rose is Good.
-
Legendary 33
- Banned User
- Posts: 6,391
- And1: 3
- Joined: Jan 24, 2009
- Location: On top of the Central Division
Re: Prove to me Derrick Rose is Good.
Also, just wondering, why wasn't this thread locked 23 pages ago? The OP presents no basis for his opinion and deliberately started a flame war..
Re: Prove to me Derrick Rose is Good.
-
ahonui06
- Banned User
- Posts: 19,926
- And1: 16
- Joined: Feb 17, 2010
Re: Prove to me Derrick Rose is Good.
Daryl Morey would be proud of this thread.
Re: Prove to me Derrick Rose is Good.
-
Legendary 33
- Banned User
- Posts: 6,391
- And1: 3
- Joined: Jan 24, 2009
- Location: On top of the Central Division
Re: Prove to me Derrick Rose is Good.
LarsV8 wrote:You can put me in the Rose is overated camp. He is certainly a good player, but I think he is fool's gold as far as a franchise guy. He reminds me a ton of Steve Francis, and Stevie was a much better defender. I think he picked up a ton of hype coming from being the number one guy in a very weak draft and sustained it by being high usage and flashy.
Another brilliant contribution from a poster who rarely watches Rose play




