tecumseh18 wrote:Randle McMurphy wrote:
As you can see, Ricciardi's drafting record is superb for what he had to work with (consistently low draft budgets).
Previous organizational unwillingness to pay overslot aside, should JP (and AA for that matter) be judged according to what were the upside and downside risks known at the time of a given trade or draft pick, or according to how it panned out.
In other words will AA always be wrong for trading Wallace for Gose, was JP always wrong for picking Romero over Tully, or can they subsequently be proved geniuses?
This is important. Most sports fans lazily use 100% hindsight. I have always been all about using a mix of hindsight and context.