ImageImage

Boss Bailey Contacted By Green Bay

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

Balls2TheWalls
RealGM
Posts: 20,343
And1: 4,113
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
         

Boss Bailey Contacted By Green Bay 

Post#1 » by Balls2TheWalls » Mon Mar 3, 2008 8:59 am

http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=723915

Looks like we are serious about bringing in some competition for the strong side.

I remember wanting him the year Barnett was drafted. Unfortunately, Bailey hasn't been healthy until the last two years.

Seems like a player that could be had on the cheap.
Mags FTW
RealGM
Posts: 35,388
And1: 8,012
Joined: Feb 16, 2006
Location: Flickin' It

 

Post#2 » by Mags FTW » Mon Mar 3, 2008 2:07 pm

Boss Bailey brings back a great memory. I used to frequent the espn message boards and when we picked Barnett with the 29th pick, the entire Lion board erupted because that left Boss Bailey for them to take with the 34th pick. They were so convinced that Boss Bailey was the no-brainer better LB talent that they said the Packers must've screwed up and thought Bailey had already been taken, so they picked Barnett. It was hilarious.

Years later, Millen and Lion fans are proved wrong yet again.
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 107,836
And1: 42,143
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

 

Post#3 » by ReasonablySober » Mon Mar 3, 2008 3:47 pm

I remember that draft and thinking it was down to Henderson and Bailey. I never even considered Barnett. Once the pick was made I did some checking up on him with a guy I knew that played with Barnett as a freshman at Oregon State. Back then, both were safeties in the same defensive backfield and he wouldn't stop raving about what a lunatic and freak Barnett was. So yea, then I was on-board.

Bailey could be a nice addition. At the very least he'd provide competition and depth at position in which we have little.
User avatar
ReddManBogieMan
Senior
Posts: 722
And1: 0
Joined: May 02, 2007
Location: ReddMan's Funeral

 

Post#4 » by ReddManBogieMan » Tue Mar 4, 2008 3:17 am

I'd be for signing him for cheap.
Image
User avatar
Nash13/Marion31
Junior
Posts: 418
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 25, 2006

 

Post#5 » by Nash13/Marion31 » Tue Mar 4, 2008 5:52 am

Yeah i'd take him cheap, but he is injury prone. I would rather have Chillar, but apparantly the Cards are high on him to and they would be more likely to give him a fat contract IMO
Eyes on the Prize Men
KAWICGB
Ballboy
Posts: 9
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 05, 2008

 

Post#6 » by KAWICGB » Thu Mar 6, 2008 12:17 am

I wouldn't be opposed to the signing of Bailey. We could really use some depth at LB, and that's exactly what this would be. Bailey wouldn't push Poppinga for the starting job.
Image

Return to Green Bay Packers