ImageImage

ESPN: East Rankings

Moderators: dms269, HMFFL, Jamaaliver

User avatar
HMFFL
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 53,998
And1: 10,359
Joined: Mar 10, 2004

ESPN: East Rankings 

Post#1 » by HMFFL » Mon Aug 9, 2010 4:30 pm

1
Miami Heat 61 21 .744 47 35 .573
Meet the Miami Globetrotters -- with the rest of the East playing the part of the Washington Generals. Our panel says the Super Friends should run circles around the rest of the conference, except perhaps for Orlando. Then again, Boston eliminated both D-Wade and King James a year ago, so that's why they play the postseason …

2
Orlando Magic 56 26 .683 59 23 .720
The Magic stumbled vs. the Celtics in the East finals, but this is much the same team that won five series the past two postseasons. Orlando might have some magical maneuvers left, perhaps shipping out Vince Carter and/or finding a way to get Chris Paul. Until then, given Miami's summer, Orlando reverts to dangerous sleeper status.

3
Boston Celtics 51 31 .622 50 32 .610
The C's showed the regular season means nothing to them, beating the Cavs and Magic despite starting on the road, and almost doing the same to the Lakers. So it matters little that Boston is projected to win "only" 51 games, as long as it can get KG, Perk and the other Men in Green healthy for April, May and June.

4
Chicago Bulls 50 32 .610 41 41 .500
The East's second tier welcomes a new member: Chicago. The Bulls swung and missed on LeBron, D-Wade and CB4, but they did get Carlos Boozer, a deeper bench and a new coach, Tom Thibodeau. That and the sharp ascent of Derrick Rose and Joakim Noah mean that Chicago's sellout crowds finally have something to see.

5
Atlanta Hawks
48 34 .585 53 29 .646
Amazingly, Atlanta has improved for five straight seasons, but our panel says the streak ends here. The Hawks are a solid team that seems stuck in no man's land, having failed to make the conference finals for 40 years -- since the Lakers swept them in the 1970 Western Division finals -- and that probably won't change in 2011. Link


My biggest concerns with our team is the lack of size and possibly chemistry issues that have been reported over the last couple months. When the season started last year it appeared that our team had a good vibe, but I think things changed as the season continued, so I hope our chemistry improves.
KJizzle
Sophomore
Posts: 114
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 15, 2006

Re: ESPN: East Rankings 

Post#2 » by KJizzle » Mon Aug 9, 2010 11:01 pm

i don't really put to much stock into the chemistry issues

i mean who isn't gonna have chemistry issues when you get blown out every game
in the second round
User avatar
saloonyk8
Rookie
Posts: 1,097
And1: 131
Joined: Jun 04, 2006

Re: ESPN: East Rankings 

Post#3 » by saloonyk8 » Mon Aug 9, 2010 11:08 pm

Problem is we're an ankle sprain or two from being the 7-8 seed. And conversely, if 1-3 sprain some ankles, we still don't sniff those positions...

but to be honest, with the new look east...I'd be happy with a 5 finish, we'd be competitive against Chicago in a series too...although not sure if we could win...
Commit to the process
HoopsGuru25
General Manager
Posts: 9,321
And1: 3
Joined: Apr 18, 2006

Re: ESPN: East Rankings 

Post#4 » by HoopsGuru25 » Tue Aug 10, 2010 1:11 am

I don't get these rankings. The Celtics are obviously a top 3 team in the East...but I find it highly unlikely that they finish with a top 3 regular season record in the East.
User avatar
ATL DirtyBird
Starter
Posts: 2,203
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 20, 2008
Location: Atlanta: Where the Hawks play hard 26 games a year!

Re: ESPN: East Rankings 

Post#5 » by ATL DirtyBird » Tue Aug 10, 2010 2:19 am

No way we win 48 games. The East got better while the Hawks didnt. It will make for an interesting season but I dont see us stacking up well with our main competitors.
Is it to much to ask for a team that plays hard and cares? Seems so.
td00
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,858
And1: 70
Joined: Aug 23, 2005
Location: CATLANTA

Re: ESPN: East Rankings 

Post#6 » by td00 » Tue Aug 10, 2010 4:05 pm

I think Milwaukee steps over both Chicago and us.

They have made good changes; they look like a team throwing all their cards in for a run now.

Would anyone be surprised to see them 3rd in a heated battle with Boston?

The Bucks have some good cohesiveness and have added huge bench depth. Their 2nd team matches up well with everyone.
User avatar
ATL DirtyBird
Starter
Posts: 2,203
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 20, 2008
Location: Atlanta: Where the Hawks play hard 26 games a year!

Re: ESPN: East Rankings 

Post#7 » by ATL DirtyBird » Wed Aug 11, 2010 5:55 am

td00 wrote:I think Milwaukee steps over both Chicago and us.

They have made good changes; they look like a team throwing all their cards in for a run now.

Would anyone be surprised to see them 3rd in a heated battle with Boston?

The Bucks have some good cohesiveness and have added huge bench depth. Their 2nd team matches up well with everyone.

Disagree. I love Chicago next year. Not sure I trust Salmons next year for the Bucks. Thats the only question I got, oh and their bench. But that seems to be a question for every team right now.
Is it to much to ask for a team that plays hard and cares? Seems so.
dms269
Forum Mod - Hawks
Forum Mod - Hawks
Posts: 8,745
And1: 1,727
Joined: Jun 27, 2005
     

Re: ESPN: East Rankings 

Post#8 » by dms269 » Wed Aug 11, 2010 10:21 am

td00 wrote:I think Milwaukee steps over both Chicago and us.

They have made good changes; they look like a team throwing all their cards in for a run now.

Would anyone be surprised to see them 3rd in a heated battle with Boston?

The Bucks have some good cohesiveness and have added huge bench depth. Their 2nd team matches up well with everyone.


I definitely would be surprised. People assume that because we didn't make any major signings that we are exactly the same team, and since the Bucks pushed the Hawks to 7 games they are better. You have Teague who saw improvements and you also have a new coach, which means new system. The Bucks killed us with their speed at the point and because of our gimmick defense. Put Teague in there and you won't get beat as easily.
The moderator formerly known as uga_dawgs24
User avatar
NWO4Life
Rookie
Posts: 1,079
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 03, 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: ESPN: East Rankings 

Post#9 » by NWO4Life » Wed Aug 11, 2010 2:55 pm

My Rankings at the end of next year...

Miami
Orlando
Atlanta
Milwaukee
Boston
Chicago
VOTE Rod Strickland into the H.O.F.!!!
User avatar
evildallas
General Manager
Posts: 9,412
And1: 1
Joined: Aug 11, 2005
Location: in the land of weak ownership
Contact:

Re: ESPN: East Rankings 

Post#10 » by evildallas » Wed Aug 11, 2010 3:47 pm

NWO4Life wrote:My Rankings at the end of next year...

Miami
Orlando
Atlanta
Milwaukee
Boston
Chicago


I may be wrong but I think under current rules that would result in the 5th seed in the playoffs as division winners are guaranteed a top 4 position. We'd open the playoffs at Boston while Milwaukee would host Chicago.
Going to donkey punch a leprechaun!
azuresou1
Head Coach
Posts: 7,444
And1: 1,095
Joined: Jun 15, 2009
   

Re: ESPN: East Rankings 

Post#11 » by azuresou1 » Wed Aug 11, 2010 4:11 pm

evildallas wrote:
NWO4Life wrote:My Rankings at the end of next year...

Miami
Orlando
Atlanta
Milwaukee
Boston
Chicago


I may be wrong but I think under current rules that would result in the 5th seed in the playoffs as division winners are guaranteed a top 4 position. We'd open the playoffs at Boston while Milwaukee would host Chicago.


Boston in the first round? Yes please.
User avatar
HMFFL
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 53,998
And1: 10,359
Joined: Mar 10, 2004

Re: ESPN: East Rankings 

Post#12 » by HMFFL » Wed Aug 11, 2010 4:18 pm

azuresou1 wrote:
evildallas wrote:
NWO4Life wrote:My Rankings at the end of next year...

Miami
Orlando
Atlanta
Milwaukee
Boston
Chicago


I may be wrong but I think under current rules that would result in the 5th seed in the playoffs as division winners are guaranteed a top 4 position. We'd open the playoffs at Boston while Milwaukee would host Chicago.


Boston in the first round? Yes please.


I felt better about facing Boston the last couple seasons, but the new additions concern me, because we continue to lack size. They probably just take the regular season easy and blow up on teams during the playoffs.
azuresou1
Head Coach
Posts: 7,444
And1: 1,095
Joined: Jun 15, 2009
   

Re: ESPN: East Rankings 

Post#13 » by azuresou1 » Wed Aug 11, 2010 4:26 pm

I'm actually worried less about them now than before. Shaq and JO worry me less than Sheed turning it on and lighting it up from 3.
User avatar
Wise1
RealGM
Posts: 18,261
And1: 256
Joined: Jun 27, 2005
Location: Devouring worlds.
     

Re: ESPN: East Rankings 

Post#14 » by Wise1 » Mon Sep 13, 2010 1:18 am

td00 wrote:I think Milwaukee steps over both Chicago and us.

They have made good changes; they look like a team throwing all their cards in for a run now.

Would anyone be surprised to see them 3rd in a heated battle with Boston?

The Bucks have some good cohesiveness and have added huge bench depth. Their 2nd team matches up well with everyone.


I'd agree with this. With a healthy Bogut, the Bucks will be as tough to beat as any team in the league. Great coaching. Great rebounding. Great defense. Great depth. I have them finishing a full 5 games ahead of Chicago in the central.
Harry10
Banned User
Posts: 8,784
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 16, 2002

Re: ESPN: East Rankings 

Post#15 » by Harry10 » Mon Sep 13, 2010 8:02 am

i understand the Rose hype, but this Boozer is hype is idiotic
Harry10
Banned User
Posts: 8,784
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 16, 2002

Re: ESPN: East Rankings 

Post#16 » by Harry10 » Mon Sep 13, 2010 8:06 am

td00 wrote:I think Milwaukee steps over both Chicago and us.

They have made good changes; they look like a team throwing all their cards in for a run now.

Would anyone be surprised to see them 3rd in a heated battle with Boston?

The Bucks have some good cohesiveness and have added huge bench depth. Their 2nd team matches up well with everyone.


a healthy 7 footer is very rare... Bucks might win games, but head to head, Horford usually dominates Bogut.
dms269
Forum Mod - Hawks
Forum Mod - Hawks
Posts: 8,745
And1: 1,727
Joined: Jun 27, 2005
     

Re: ESPN: East Rankings 

Post#17 » by dms269 » Mon Sep 13, 2010 11:26 am

I also think with Teague emerging as more of a role and less defensive switches will help us a lot with the Bucks. That killed us that whole series, Bibby would get caught up with a switch and Ridnour or Jennings would just fly to the basket untouched. I think Teague can stay with those faster point guards and cut off that lane.
The moderator formerly known as uga_dawgs24

Return to Atlanta Hawks