birdman113 wrote:I got to meet him too?
Did you?
No and I really couldn't give a ****.
Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
birdman113 wrote:I got to meet him too?
Did you?

birdman113 wrote:hobojoe2131 wrote:birdman113 wrote:Im from wisconsin too.
Ive seen him live three times (i saw one of their playoff games against Atlanta, crazy game)
And ive seen him on tv plenty.
So dont call me a nothing guy.
Well make some posts that make some sense and don't bring everything back to a bad yo momma joke and I might care what you have to say. Until then, your points fall on deaf ears.
Yo momma has deaf ears.


basaglia wrote:bklynstoops wrote:basaglia wrote:And there it is...this is Knick fandom 2010. You guys hate Isiah so much that you will hype a PG who had 4 years to prove he was any good on an expansion team and was weak as hell. NO ONE wanted him...and then the Knicks came along. What's that tell you?
I wish a bunch of you would follow up with some nonsense about Felt-on being better than Jennings. Matter of fact, I'm gonna keep upping that subject all season long...Felt-on vs. Jennings...all because this guy spat out that garbage.
dude, why so worked up? You're the only one trying to rewrite history. Isiah sucked. Let's at least agree on that. If you really have to be hand-held through all the events of the debacle that was the Isiah era, then I don't know what to say.
Seems like you're just upset that, in your perception, Walsh is getting more leeway than Isiah. If that is the case, it's because Isiah was just that bad and left a situation where fans were going to be more patient as long as there was a direction. You can't take away from what Walsh has done to clean up the mess. If you want clear evidence that he's done a good job, just look at your boy Isiah trying to climb in the ring now. You think he'd be trying to get face time with the Knicks again, if the perception of the organization hasn't improved since he left?
Let's see what the team looks like this season. A lot of things have changed since last year. It just sounds like hate when you're trying to put us in the lottery again just because you're pissed someone replaced your guy.
You seem reasonable. You're cool.
However, I'm not trying to put the Knicks in the lottery. Look at that roster. Not one defender. Walsh is trying to get Jeffries back because he knows it.
?birdman113 wrote:Blocking shots is the only thing he can do defensivly.
Thats one of the reasons he was in Nelsons doghouse.
omerome wrote:birdman113 wrote:Blocking shots is the only thing he can do defensivly.
Thats one of the reasons he was in Nelsons doghouse.
You sound like Isiah Thomas.
Are blocks overrated too?

birdman113 wrote:Why do you think i said Eddy Curry is our secret weapon?
StutterStep wrote:JohnStarksTheDunk wrote:Sorry, Stutter, I should have clarified. I meant in terms of a rebuild, and it's clear you meant in terms of pure talent. Had Isiah done nothing, we would have had a ton of salary coming off the cap that first off-season, and more the following one, and all of our future picks.
You make a good point about Randolph and Crawford, but keep in mind that neither of those guys was ever considered a terrible player -- they were just overpaid. In that regard, I would compare them to the contracts of H20 (who did get injured, which obviously wasn't Isiah's fault) and KVH. Solid players, who just weren't as good as their contracts paid them.
Where Isiah's roster is worse than Layden's is in the Eddy Curry, Jerome James, Jared Jeffries, and Quentin Richardson regard. Two of those players are utterly useless and the other two aren't really any more serviceable than Shandon Anderson or Howard Eisley, whom Isiah inherited.
Jeffries and QRich are still valued. Hated Curr/James acquisitions so no argument. Plus, I'm not debating that Isiah did a good job as a GM. I'm debating whether the roster he left was worse than what he inherited.
Lampje, Sweetney, Eisley, Ward --- a bunch of players who never played any significant minutes for any team once Isiah traded them. I can't say that about any of the guys Zeke traded or drafted. In the case of draft picks, we're talking Balkman/Mardy -- guys who don't make much money and never got enough playing time.
Isiah couldn't do nothing, as in a rebuild. Dolan wanted playoffs. That was stated in the press conference. Dolan does not understand the purpose of a rebuild. The only way Walsh sold it was that we would get LeBron.
?birdman113 wrote:Blocking shots is the only thing he can do defensivly.
Thats one of the reasons he was in Nelsons doghouse.
?
basaglia wrote:hobojoe2131 wrote:I fail to see a point there.
Point is Jennings isn't a Knicks and it's Walsh's fault.
haterade wrote:basaglia wrote:hobojoe2131 wrote:I fail to see a point there.
Point is Jennings isn't a Knicks and it's Walsh's fault.
Actually the point is Jennings isn't a Knick and its Jennings' fault. Walsh, D'Antoni, and the Knicks brass flew out to Europe to work out Jennings and Jennings didn't go to the work out. What does that tell you about the guy? If he wanted to be a Knick so bad, why didn't he go to the work out?
StutterStep wrote:He played a full season. All of the Knicks international scouts had already seen him. He didn't attend some "camp" at the end of the year in Europe after a full season. He did not cancel a workout.
In fact, he came here to MSG and worked out for them before the draft.
StutterStep wrote:
He played a full season. All of the Knicks international scouts had already seen him. He didn't attend some "camp" at the end of the year in Europe after a full season. He did not cancel a workout.
In fact, he came here to MSG and worked out for them before the draft.


basaglia wrote:All kidding aside: when will Walsh be held accountable on his own merits? I say never. And the Knicks will still be a lottery team 3 and 4 years from now.
Mush Man wrote:Even if Jennings turns out to be a Top-10 PG by the time his rookie contract is up, I'm still glad the Knicks passed on him.
It's not like at the time of the draft we were San Antonio, Boston or Los Angeles: a team with leaders, team players, a take no BS coach, and a winning atmosphere. A team like that can take a talented but undisciplined player and incorporate him into the culture that already exists (think Rodman with Bulls, Artest with Lakers, even Nate next year with Boston, etc).
At the time, we were a team of misfits, me-first stat-stuffers, and headcases. It would have fed into all of the worst instincts Jennings had coming into the NBA.
I bet if a Jennings-2.0 comes along 2-3 years from now, after Walsh's mark has been set on the organization... not just in players, but in attitude, team play, and expecting to win... you would see us take a risk.
But Knicks version 2009 NBA draft... I'm glad we passed.
I bet Zeke pushed for Jennings...
god shammgod wrote:didn't watch a minute. it feels good. might not watch more than a game or two for the rest of the season. there's nothing to see. our best player is a midget g-leaguer.