All of that being said, I'm just wondering (since you guys as Rockets fans are the "experts"), does the phrase "Morey pwned Walsh" still ring true? I happen to think it does since you folks got a lot pieces for McGrady's expiring while the Knicks IMO put all of their eggs into T-Mac's expiring Easter basket and ended up with Amar'e's surgically repaired knees and his detached retina. To me, New York wasn't betting on Amar'e, they were betting on LBJ and forced to settle for Amar'e who IMO doesn't make them a .500 team. The other guy argues that you folks were betting on Bosh but I don't think anyone seriously expected him to go to Houston anyway. That being said, I still believe Morey and your FO got the better end of the deal. What do you guys think?
FYI, all of this started because I said the following with regards to the Collison/Posey/Murphy/Lee/Ariza trade:
This was a straight salary dump by Houston. Lee is icing on the cake. Apparently Morey wasn't content with pwning the Knicks last year and decided that he had to go in and lay some smack down on a New Orleans trade which makes sense for almost every team involved except for well...New Orleans.
and the guy got all upset and responded with:
i see this a lot, but the knicks basically traded jordan hill (who appears to be a bust, and they knew it), the pick that became patrick patterson, and a likely non-lotto pick for amare stoudemire and raymond felton. the knicks did just fine. morey was supposed to use the knicks' assets to land a big fish and failed.