lordjeff05 wrote:I really don't get some of these comments. I understand if you think we could have gotten more for Collison. So did I. But it makes no sense to keep him if you intend on keeping CP.
That's the point: "intend on keeping CP" is IRRELEVANT if he wants to leave once his contract is up. It doesn't matter what the TEAM WANTS at that point, it's what the player wants. And since that player has said he wants to play for a contender, the picture is clear.
You can't just sit on your best trade asset while trying to appease your superstar.
And you can't appease your superstar if the deal doesn't accomplish the goal. The catch is that the goal isn't possible in a year and a half.
If we wanted to keep Collison then we should have just traded CP. If my options are keeping cp and getting ariza or trading collison, then guess what, I trade collison.
I'm a hornet fan before I am a Paul fan. I would have much rather seen the team try to package CP with Emeka and get a package with Granger for the future of the team than to watch Paul walk and become the Cavs watching Lebron take the entire franchise with him.
Even if the hornets weren't the obvious winners, this trade is by no means the boneheaded move people are characterizing it as. We are taking a gamble and it is worth it to see if that gamble will work out.
It is boneheaded for the long-term good of the team. This team has trouble enough attracting free agents and making quality moves. Their main hope is drafting star talent. And they threw that hope away for a short term "fix" that won't end up "fixing" anything.
We are a better team with Ariza playing 35 minutes a game then we are with Collison playing 20 minutes a gmae.
We are not a better team with no Paul, no Collison, and looking to trade away Ariza.



