ImageImageImageImageImage

The Javale McGee Appreciation Thread

Moderators: nate33, montestewart, LyricalRico

hands11
Banned User
Posts: 31,171
And1: 2,444
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Javale McGee Thread 

Post#401 » by hands11 » Sun Aug 15, 2010 8:18 pm

closg00 wrote:McGee has been officially cut from team USA along with Green.


http://nba.fanhouse.com/2010/08/15/team ... ee/?synd=1

"No,'' Colangelo said when asked if he's concerned about the team's lack of height. "We are who are. You can't create something you're not. We're going to have to get it done in other ways: Athleticism, guard-oriented pressure and we got to shoot the ball (well).''

So even on another team that really really needed a tall center, McGee doesn't make the cut.

Height along does not make you a center it appears.

http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/ ... am-usa.php
JaVale McGee is a freak athlete, but that alone is not enough to get you on Team USA.

He also showed a real connection with John Wall during Summer League, and on a team that is going to get out and run this year an athlete like McGee will have the chance to throw it down a lot in transition. He's going to make a lot of highlight films.

But his whole game needs to round out for him to be a Team USA quality player.

--
The kid just isn't ready to be a starting center in the NBA.
hands11
Banned User
Posts: 31,171
And1: 2,444
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Javale McGee Thread 

Post#402 » by hands11 » Mon Aug 16, 2010 4:54 am

http://www.bulletsforever.com/2010/8/15 ... #storyjump


Nice rap up on McGee's time with Team USA and what he should take from it.
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,233
And1: 8,066
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: Javale McGee Thread 

Post#403 » by Dat2U » Mon Aug 16, 2010 8:28 am

Maybe one option the Wizards should look at is McGee playing the PF role defensively while Blatche guards Cs. It's not ideal but McGee's main weakness is his man-2-man post D. The further away from the basket and the less potential for contact there is, the better McGee is. He's not a total waste defensively, I think combined with his length he's mobile enough to challenge shots on the perimeter. He's also long enough to recover and block and shot even if a PF is able to face up and take him off the dribble.

Offensively however, McGee is a C through & through. While he can make an occasional jump shot or behind the back move those are not reliable aspects of his game. What he is an incredible finisher with excellent hands & touch around the basket. Taking him away from the basket offensively would seem to be counter productive.

Ideally McGee would be our super-sub at backup C for 24-28 minutes a night. To me that's his ideal role at least for right now. I think he could help a team win games in a role where he's mainly dominating inferior backups instead of being consistently matched up against starting Cs looking to expose him in the block. As of now, were hoping we can survive with him at C. It's asking alot of him. I do think Wall & Gil to a lesser extent will ease the role for him offensively and I suspect he'll be very productive and maintain a high PER but defensively we definitely should be looking for ways to minimize him getting consistently exposed.
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Javale McGee Thread 

Post#404 » by Ruzious » Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:44 am

I don't think Jav will ever be Haywood defensively, but it'd be foolish to right him off as a 20 minute max player. A lot of us followed Haywood for years and never would have thought he'd be where he is defensively. And that was after 4 years with tremendous coaching at UNC. He was totally clueless his first 2 years with the Wizards - and older than Jav. Big men typically develop slowly, and Jav especially has an excuse because he's been a late grower. Most players stop growing height-wise as teenagers, and he was still gowing as a 22 year old.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Javale McGee Thread 

Post#405 » by Ruzious » Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:51 am

hands11 wrote:
hermitkid wrote:Problem with McGee is his atrocious defense. Can't trust a player like this more than 10 minutes.

I seriously wondering if he's just hopeless in that department. Three years without an ounce of improvement is quite disturbing really.



Two years. Only one under a defensive minded coach. 18th pick project athletic big who is only 22.

He just added 7 pounds of muscle after a good summer. Now he is getting some practice/experience with team USA.

Give him some more time and play him more at PF off the bench and I think people would be less frustrated.

If we didn't need a defensive center so badly, I don't think people would be are focused on McGees negatives - poor center defense. Lets see if we can find someone else to play there. If we had that covered and McGee was just an off the bench energy transition PF/C who can block shots, I think he would look like more of an asset.

I think the sooner people stop looking at him as our starting center this year, the happier they will be with him. Start looking at Seraphin to do it more than McGee. Seraphin fits the mold a lot more than McGee does. But to start the year, look to Yi, Armstrong or Dray. The team immediately looks a lot stronger if you do that. Personally, I think it will be Yi. I think Yi will be able pick up what Flip and Sam tell him to do quicker than McGee. Or Yi plays PF and Dray holds down center until Seraphin is ready.

McGee is a least another year away from being a starter. Maybe two. He would still only be 24.

Forget about Yi as a center. He may have great looking biceps and be right around 7 foot, but he doesn't have the body or physicality to play C. Jav may look skinny, but he's got at least 15 pounds on Yi.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
closg00
RealGM
Posts: 24,804
And1: 4,629
Joined: Nov 21, 2004

Re: Javale McGee Thread 

Post#406 » by closg00 » Mon Aug 16, 2010 10:32 am

Dat2U wrote:Maybe one option the Wizards should look at is McGee playing the PF role defensively while Blatche guards Cs. It's not ideal but McGee's main weakness is his man-2-man post D. The further away from the basket and the less potential for contact there is, the better McGee is. He's not a total waste defensively, I think combined with his length he's mobile enough to challenge shots on the perimeter. He's also long enough to recover and block and shot even if a PF is able to face up and take him off the dribble.

Offensively however, McGee is a C through & through. While he can make an occasional jump shot or behind the back move those are not reliable aspects of his game. What he is an incredible finisher with excellent hands & touch around the basket. Taking him away from the basket offensively would seem to be counter productive.

Ideally McGee would be our super-sub at backup C for 24-28 minutes a night. To me that's his ideal role at least for right now. I think he could help a team win games in a role where he's mainly dominating inferior backups instead of being consistently matched up against starting Cs looking to expose him in the block. As of now, were hoping we can survive with him at C. It's asking alot of him. I do think Wall & Gil to a lesser extent will ease the role for him offensively and I suspect he'll be very productive and maintain a high PER but defensively we definitely should be looking for ways to minimize him getting consistently exposed.


Agree, the super-sub role playing under 30 minutes a night while learning would be ideal for McGee. His asthma limits his effectiveness to about 25-30 minutes a night anyway.
User avatar
doclinkin
RealGM
Posts: 15,227
And1: 6,943
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Location: .wizuds.

Re: Javale McGee Thread 

Post#407 » by doclinkin » Mon Aug 16, 2010 10:53 am

Dat2U wrote:Maybe one option the Wizards should look at is McGee playing the PF role defensively while Blatche guards Cs. It's not ideal but McGee's main weakness is his man-2-man post D. The further away from the basket and the less potential for contact there is, the better McGee is. He's not a total waste defensively, I think combined with his length he's mobile enough to challenge shots on the perimeter. He's also long enough to recover and block and shot even if a PF is able to face up and take him off the dribble.

Offensively however, McGee is a C through & through. While he can make an occasional jump shot or behind the back move those are not reliable aspects of his game. What he is an incredible finisher with excellent hands & touch around the basket. Taking him away from the basket offensively would seem to be counter productive.



Dunno though. One of McGee's key strengths is his quickness and mobility at that height. And one of his core weaknesses is his inability to establish or hold position on the interior. He did well in summer ball playing the high pick and roll game with John Wall, I suspect they'll continue to run the play in the regular season as well as similar wrinkles to pull JV out in space but let him get up a head of steam diving towards the paint instead of posting him down there and expecting him to fight it out.
User avatar
pancakes3
General Manager
Posts: 9,596
And1: 3,029
Joined: Jul 27, 2003
Location: Virginia
Contact:

Re: Javale McGee Thread 

Post#408 » by pancakes3 » Mon Aug 16, 2010 1:48 pm

i always thought that mcgee should guard PFs since it would mean he doesn't guard post-up players as much, and be more effective as a help defender. however at this point, mcgee is (allegedly) sitting at 7'1 and 250lbs which would make him one HECK of a defensive presence on defense if he would learn to not leave his feet. it depends on if you think mcgee is set in his development or not. if he's a finished product, then yes let's maximize his abilities. if he's got the capability to grow (fast) and learn, then i think we stick him in the lion's den for another season and let him get used to playing the biggest guys on the court.

on offense, i thought that wall and blatche would be the pnr pairing of choice. gil should be paired up with mcgee. primarily, not exclusively. but yeah... mcgee should be doing ZERO posting up. as the 5th option who's sole responsibility on offense is to finish oops, no. just no post ups for JV.
Bullets -> Wizards
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Javale McGee Thread 

Post#409 » by Ruzious » Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:11 pm

pancakes3 wrote:i always thought that mcgee should guard PFs since it would mean he doesn't guard post-up players as much, and be more effective as a help defender. however at this point, mcgee is (allegedly) sitting at 7'1 and 250lbs which would make him one HECK of a defensive presence on defense if he would learn to not leave his feet. it depends on if you think mcgee is set in his development or not. if he's a finished product, then yes let's maximize his abilities. if he's got the capability to grow (fast) and learn, then i think we stick him in the lion's den for another season and let him get used to playing the biggest guys on the court.

+1. It's a rebuilding year. As long as he puts in the effort, let's see what he can be.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
User avatar
Chocolate City Jordanaire
RealGM
Posts: 55,220
And1: 10,680
Joined: Aug 05, 2001
       

Re: Javale McGee Thread 

Post#410 » by Chocolate City Jordanaire » Mon Aug 16, 2010 5:12 pm

hands11 wrote:
Ruzious wrote:
hands11 wrote:But since he does seem to problems breathing and he does like to run, wouldn't he be better using him 20 minutes or so a game off the bench instead ?

He is a momentum changer. Maybe we should use him that way.

We did slate him to be our Birdman last year.

But when you have arguably the most athletic center in the NBA - and he's 7'1.25, do you really want to keep your expectations that low?


But what makes a center a center ? You have 6-9 and 6-10 centers. Is McGee really a center or is he just 7-1 and we need a center so we call him one.

Rule #1 for a center in my book is they have to be able to defend the position. They have know the game well enough to play team D. One of Haywood greatest strengths ( beside his 7-0 strong body ) was that he was smart and vocal. He know what to do man on man and zone and called out the defense to the team. Center is the middle LB of basketball.

Is that McGee ?

It's not really a matter of low expectations. It's a matter of facing reality about what you have in him and how long it will likely take for things to change enough that you can count him as a starter. Remember how young he is 22. And how much experience he has. 2 sessions. And that he is an 18th pick 7-1 project big. And that this is only his second year under a defensive coach (Flip) and he has already played for two coaches. Project bigs like this usually are not starting centers after only two years. He isn't a Lopez.

We all know he was really raw coming into the league. He has actually surprised a lot of people with how athletic he is and how well he can run and leap. Personally, I even believe that he will develop a reliable shot with some range over the next two years. But as of right now, he doesn't even bring the ball up to it's peak for the release. When he learns to do that, he is going to be a lot harder to block. Dirk doesn't even jump when he shoots but his release is really high.

But as we have learned more about the kid we have also learned that he is NY mentally. Meaning he is mostly focused on relying on his athletics over using his brain. He is also more focused on what he can do with the ball anytime it hits his hands as was evident in that USA scrimmage where instead of just giving the ball back to the ball handler who got stuck, he without any hesitation shot a poor outside shoot. To make matters worse, he didn't even get set. Seeing that tells me he still hasn't learned what a team needs from him and he is still in spazz mode. They game hasn't slowed down for him. He is just operating off instincts. He doesn't play smart team ball. He doesn't know when it is appropriate for him to shoot. But that isn't an issue if he is on a fast break and someone throws it up there for him. That is a green light to flush it down.

So what you have is a 7-1 high flying dunking big with lots of agility who can drive and put the ball behind his back on the way to the hoop. That doesn't sound like a move a center attempts. It's amazing he can do it, but that isn't what we primarily need from him. Sounds more like a SF or a very athletic PF.

He has asthma and get winded. He doesn't get the mental part of the game yet. He doesn't like the contact of the post game but he did put in good work this summer and added 7 pounds of muscle to get stronger. A player who mentally wants to play the game Dray plays more than trying to develop into the role we need him to play as a defensive center. A kid that is still very young at 22 and still only played 2 sessions.

So IMO, all that adds up to.
- You keep him around because he is progressing physically and he is only 22.
- He isn't really behind schedule as a starting center. It takes longer than 2 years for a project like him who was to skinny to bang in the middle.
- You use his energy and athleticism while he learns more. This means a role player off the bench.

Hands11 Rule #1 - All your starters have to be at least good defenders. Your centers have to be at least a 7 out of 1-10. I prefer at least an 8.

- Don't put a square peg in a round hole. McGee sees his game developing as a more athletic version of Dray. If he could become that, he could be absolutely amazing. It could be a while before he ever gets the mental part but what he can do physically is amazing. If we didn't need a center so badly, I would play him 80% of the time at PF. But this is what we did to Dray also. We needed a center more that an PF and Dray was 7-0. What if Darryl Green was made into a WR simply because he was so fast. Right now, McGee is not a center. He is not a mental player which you need to be if you want to be a center. He is not that mental and physical LB like Haywood was.

So I say use and develop that kid for what positives he can give you instead of being frustrated by what he isn't ready to give you while he continues to mature mentally and physically.

All that adds up to a role player off the bench because we already have Dray at PF. A high flying running transition 7-1 high flying PF who can block shots and give you some minutes at C if you put a strong PF next to him.

Best way to start him is to put him with Dray and let Dray defend the center. But that isn't ideally what this team needs. You would be taking away from Drays game just to make room for McGee. With the right center, Dray should play 90% of the time at PF on both ends.

But he isn't ready to start at center and defend the position. He isn't basketball smart enough or mature enough to do it. He is simply a 7-1 version of NY. He is closer to an Amare type. He is a transition big who can run that doesn't defend well. It's going to take at least another year of adding muscle and learning more about the game before he can possible start at center. If that is even the right thing to do with him instead of PF. I have long said, let the kid do what he knows he can do first. Let him be a transition PF while he matures and gets stronger and learns the game. Then maybe move him to center later.

As of today, I would rather see Yi, Armstrong starting at center. Once I see Seraphin, I will know more if he is worthy of the investment of starting minutes. I at least know he wants to play there and has the lower body to do it and he has a back to the basket game with left and right handed hook shots. I have a feeling Seraphin is going to show us he will be able to grow into that players at center quicker than McGee. And because I believe Seraphin will develop more quickly there, I think McGee is going to develop as an off the bench transition high flying PF. Birdman with more offense or an Amare type.


hands, you and I are about the only two who've said this: McGee is a very tall forward. Just because he's tall doesn't mean he's a C.

My comparison: A taller Larry Nance. Nance was a much better defender. (Larry Sanders really is another Larry Nance IMO, but that's for another post). McGee's real talent is that he can run the court and dunk. He's a fabulous shot blocker. He's a decent to good rebounder. Javale with stamina is a big time scorer at PF.

I wish I still had the link to an article about Pau Gasol starting off as a SF in Europe. When he came to the NBA he was a PF. McGee has game much closer to Pau than he is to Andrew Bynum or Greg Oden. he lacks Pau's passing ability and touch around the basket, but I see McGee getting touch once his dunks are respected around the league.

I think McGee with Seraphin (if he's good) might be the look in the future. Don't know where that leaves Andray Blatche, but I think McGee's potentially better.
closg00
RealGM
Posts: 24,804
And1: 4,629
Joined: Nov 21, 2004

Re: Javale McGee Thread 

Post#411 » by closg00 » Mon Aug 16, 2010 5:21 pm

Asked if he was concerned about the lack of height on the team after cutting McGee, Krzyzewski said: "McGee wasn't playing before. So it's the same concern we had with McGee.

"We don't have bulk. JaVale is really good; he didn't have bulk, either."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... 03292.html

Ouch! Words of motivation for McGee I hope.
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Javale McGee Thread 

Post#412 » by Ruzious » Mon Aug 16, 2010 7:08 pm

CCJ, McGee is 6'13.25" and 250. Larry Nance was 6'10 and maybe 220 (actually listed at 205). That's why one is a C and the other an F. Maybe Jav does eventually settle in at PF, but why settle on that - when good centers are much harder to find than good PF's? You mentioned Gasol - as he showed with Bynum being a part-time player, he's probably even better as a C than a PF - he's great at either position. If Gasol was just a PF, then LAL wouldn't be the team they are.

Btw, Jav's fundamentals and footwork are miles and miles away from Gasol's. Jav's a better athlete, but... he's got so far to go to that it's not a fair comparison at this point.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
User avatar
Chocolate City Jordanaire
RealGM
Posts: 55,220
And1: 10,680
Joined: Aug 05, 2001
       

Re: Javale McGee Thread 

Post#413 » by Chocolate City Jordanaire » Mon Aug 16, 2010 7:18 pm

Pau's a better player. Gasol's just more talented in terms of basketball skills.

Javale is eight years younger.

No telling how good McGee would be if he got the same type coaching Bargnani and Gasol did with European junior teams and pro clubs along the way. They don't simply see a tall guy and insist he bang. They allow the taller players to develop fundamentals, allow them to handle the ball outside the low block, and don't insist guys bang. They develop footwork.

McGee's no Gasol, but he's got enormous potential for improvement.
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,233
And1: 8,066
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: Javale McGee Thread 

Post#414 » by Dat2U » Mon Aug 16, 2010 7:35 pm

doclinkin wrote:
Dat2U wrote:Maybe one option the Wizards should look at is McGee playing the PF role defensively while Blatche guards Cs. It's not ideal but McGee's main weakness is his man-2-man post D. The further away from the basket and the less potential for contact there is, the better McGee is. He's not a total waste defensively, I think combined with his length he's mobile enough to challenge shots on the perimeter. He's also long enough to recover and block and shot even if a PF is able to face up and take him off the dribble.

Offensively however, McGee is a C through & through. While he can make an occasional jump shot or behind the back move those are not reliable aspects of his game. What he is an incredible finisher with excellent hands & touch around the basket. Taking him away from the basket offensively would seem to be counter productive.



Dunno though. One of McGee's key strengths is his quickness and mobility at that height. And one of his core weaknesses is his inability to establish or hold position on the interior. He did well in summer ball playing the high pick and roll game with John Wall, I suspect they'll continue to run the play in the regular season as well as similar wrinkles to pull JV out in space but let him get up a head of steam diving towards the paint instead of posting him down there and expecting him to fight it out.


Oh I mostly agree. My point was I didn't want to see McGee hanging out on the perimeter taking jump shots. The only reason he should be away from the paint is b/c he's setting a pick/screen and rolling to the basket.

The playing PF on offense thing is DOA. McGee doesn't have that skillset. He doesn't have a reliable jumper, he doesn't really have a face up game. McGee is not take someone off the dribble successfully most of the time. Why would anyone want him to? Defensively, yes, their might be some benefits to him to defending PFs as opposed to Cs, but offensively I don't see how McGee is effective there.
closg00
RealGM
Posts: 24,804
And1: 4,629
Joined: Nov 21, 2004

Re: Javale McGee Thread 

Post#415 » by closg00 » Mon Aug 16, 2010 7:48 pm

Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:Pau's a better player. Gasol's just more talented in terms of basketball skills.

Javale is eight years younger.

No telling how good McGee would be if he got the same type coaching Bargnani and Gasol did with European junior teams and pro clubs along the way. They don't simply see a tall guy and insist he bang. They allow the taller players to develop fundamentals, allow them to handle the ball outside the low block, and don't insist guys bang. They develop footwork.

McGee's no Gasol, but he's got enormous potential for improvement.


Gonna send Ted an email. Get a bigman coach to work with McGee (and the other young bigs) like the Pacers did for Hibbert and I am confident that the investment will pay-off in a few years. When McGee finally stops growing and fills-out a bit, he will have the potential to be a very effective player both offensively and defensively.
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Javale McGee Thread 

Post#416 » by Ruzious » Mon Aug 16, 2010 8:00 pm

closg00 wrote:
Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:Pau's a better player. Gasol's just more talented in terms of basketball skills.

Javale is eight years younger.

No telling how good McGee would be if he got the same type coaching Bargnani and Gasol did with European junior teams and pro clubs along the way. They don't simply see a tall guy and insist he bang. They allow the taller players to develop fundamentals, allow them to handle the ball outside the low block, and don't insist guys bang. They develop footwork.

McGee's no Gasol, but he's got enormous potential for improvement.


Gonna send Ted an email. Get a bigman coach to work with McGee (and the other young bigs) like the Pacers did for Hibbert and I am confident that the investment will pay-off in a few years. When McGee finally stops growing and fills-out a bit, he will have the potential to be a very effective player both offensively and defensively.

Maybe suggest Jeff Ruland. He's coaching at nearby UDC. I'd think he'd rather be an assistant here than the big cheese there. Dude could flat out thump. What's Rick Mahorn doing? With all our young bigs, we could use both McFilthy and McNasty to show em the way!
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
hands11
Banned User
Posts: 31,171
And1: 2,444
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Javale McGee Thread 

Post#417 » by hands11 » Mon Aug 16, 2010 10:21 pm

Dat2U wrote:Maybe one option the Wizards should look at is McGee playing the PF role defensively while Blatche guards Cs. It's not ideal but McGee's main weakness is his man-2-man post D. The further away from the basket and the less potential for contact there is, the better McGee is. He's not a total waste defensively, I think combined with his length he's mobile enough to challenge shots on the perimeter. He's also long enough to recover and block and shot even if a PF is able to face up and take him off the dribble.

Offensively however, McGee is a C through & through. While he can make an occasional jump shot or behind the back move those are not reliable aspects of his game. What he is an incredible finisher with excellent hands & touch around the basket. Taking him away from the basket offensively would seem to be counter productive.

Ideally McGee would be our super-sub at backup C for 24-28 minutes a night. To me that's his ideal role at least for right now. I think he could help a team win games in a role where he's mainly dominating inferior backups instead of being consistently matched up against starting Cs looking to expose him in the block. As of now, were hoping we can survive with him at C. It's asking alot of him. I do think Wall & Gil to a lesser extent will ease the role for him offensively and I suspect he'll be very productive and maintain a high PER but defensively we definitely should be looking for ways to minimize him getting consistently exposed.



Yeah. I just wrote about that. That is defiantly an option. Dray is the best defensive center we have. But it isn't ideal since we don't want Dray getting beat up down there. But it's looking more and more like that is the way to go if you want McGee on the court with Dray running fast breaks on offense and getting the ally ops. McGee could grow to be a good weakside leaping defender a lot faster than he works out as a Haywood type center.

Or it's going to have to be Armstrong. It's just hard to see Yi or Seraphin being ready to start the season there and we can be pretty sure McGee won't be ready.
hands11
Banned User
Posts: 31,171
And1: 2,444
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Javale McGee Thread 

Post#418 » by hands11 » Mon Aug 16, 2010 10:30 pm

Ruzious wrote:I don't think Jav will ever be Haywood defensively, but it'd be foolish to right him off as a 20 minute max player. A lot of us followed Haywood for years and never would have thought he'd be where he is defensively. And that was after 4 years with tremendous coaching at UNC. He was totally clueless his first 2 years with the Wizards - and older than Jav. Big men typically develop slowly, and Jav especially has an excuse because he's been a late grower. Most players stop growing height-wise as teenagers, and he was still gowing as a 22 year old.


I would have to disagree. Some of us saw Haywood had it. With Haywood it was easy to see his defense would grow first and his offense would come along with more touches. I was always a Haywood believer.

With McGee it's the opposite. I still believe in the kid but hard to imagine him getting it as a defensive center until he starts to show more signs that the light is going on. But he can run like the wind for 5 minutes or so. Amazing leaps for his size. But again, he is NY at 7-1. If he only had a brain. But he is only 22. It's just going to take more time. In two years he should be pretty awesome.
User avatar
pancakes3
General Manager
Posts: 9,596
And1: 3,029
Joined: Jul 27, 2003
Location: Virginia
Contact:

Re: Javale McGee Thread 

Post#419 » by pancakes3 » Mon Aug 16, 2010 11:23 pm

hands11 wrote:Hands11 Rule #1 - All your starters have to be at least good defenders. Your centers have to be at least a 7 out of 1-10. I prefer at least an 8.


pancakes rule #1 - don't get caught up in the "should" rule, especially with sports teams.

i feel like a lot of GMs and coaches get caught up in this trap as well. Some won't draft tweeners because they're not what a player SHOULD look like. some won't play certain players because they don't fit a certain style of offense. etc. bottom line is you play with the players you've got. you can barter and trade all you want during the off season but once autumn hits, you're in it until april (hopefully june. sometimes february.) and you've got to roll with what the basketball gods give you.

ideally yeah, we'd have a dwight howard at C. at least haywood. we don't. between armstrong and mcgee we've picking between either mr. rock or mr. hard place. mcgee is the more talented one of the two so he's going to start even if he ranks about a 5 at best on the defense-o-meter.

no, he's not haywood. however, we don't have haywood and like it or not, the kid is going to play almost 30mpg. tall forward or not, we don't have a C and blatche is twice the PF mcgee can ever hope to be. he's the C.

defensively, i'll agree we've got a little wiggle room. we can play the matchups, go into the occasional zone, etc. however, as i pointed out earlier, given our "rebuilding" status and mcgee's relative youth, we can afford to throw him into the lion's den and see how he comes out at the other end. if at the end of this season mcgee's clearly NOT a good defensive C, then we can talk about pulling a tim duncan/mcdyess and have mcgee play PF defensively and C offensively. if mcgee (gasp) LEARNS a little something about not leaving his feet, anticipating fakes vs actual attempts, etc. as this season goes on, hey... bully for us.

alls is sayin is that the time to go through our transactions with a red marker and X'ing our deficiencies is near over. it's time to start looking at the glass half empty and see where we can succeed rather than where we're going to fail. every team has weaknesses, even the unholy triad known as the miami cheat.* as long as our weakness at C is less exploitable than other teams' weaknesses at pg/sg/sf/pf we're going to win more games than not. yes i included sf. josh howard is still able to win matchups against the terrence williams's, and nicolas batums of the league.

*i fully expect wall to shoot something like 16fta/g against miami.
Bullets -> Wizards
hands11
Banned User
Posts: 31,171
And1: 2,444
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Javale McGee Thread 

Post#420 » by hands11 » Tue Aug 17, 2010 3:53 am

pancakes3 wrote:
hands11 wrote:Hands11 Rule #1 - All your starters have to be at least good defenders. Your centers have to be at least a 7 out of 1-10. I prefer at least an 8.


pancakes rule #1 - don't get caught up in the "should" rule, especially with sports teams.

i feel like a lot of GMs and coaches get caught up in this trap as well. Some won't draft tweeners because they're not what a player SHOULD look like. some won't play certain players because they don't fit a certain style of offense. etc. bottom line is you play with the players you've got. you can barter and trade all you want during the off season but once autumn hits, you're in it until april (hopefully june. sometimes february.) and you've got to roll with what the basketball gods give you.

ideally yeah, we'd have a dwight howard at C. at least haywood. we don't. between armstrong and mcgee we've picking between either mr. rock or mr. hard place. mcgee is the more talented one of the two so he's going to start even if he ranks about a 5 at best on the defense-o-meter.

no, he's not haywood. however, we don't have haywood and like it or not, the kid is going to play almost 30mpg. tall forward or not, we don't have a C and blatche is twice the PF mcgee can ever hope to be. he's the C.

defensively, i'll agree we've got a little wiggle room. we can play the matchups, go into the occasional zone, etc. however, as i pointed out earlier, given our "rebuilding" status and mcgee's relative youth, we can afford to throw him into the lion's den and see how he comes out at the other end. if at the end of this season mcgee's clearly NOT a good defensive C, then we can talk about pulling a tim duncan/mcdyess and have mcgee play PF defensively and C offensively. if mcgee (gasp) LEARNS a little something about not leaving his feet, anticipating fakes vs actual attempts, etc. as this season goes on, hey... bully for us.

alls is sayin is that the time to go through our transactions with a red marker and X'ing our deficiencies is near over. it's time to start looking at the glass half empty and see where we can succeed rather than where we're going to fail. every team has weaknesses, even the unholy triad known as the miami cheat.* as long as our weakness at C is less exploitable than other teams' weaknesses at pg/sg/sf/pf we're going to win more games than not. yes i included sf. josh howard is still able to win matchups against the terrence williams's, and nicolas batums of the league.

*i fully expect wall to shoot something like 16fta/g against miami.


I think this is what we are doing.

This is a team, not McGees practice squad. If he can't do the primary thing your head coach wants you to do at your position, then you look for someone else to do it.

The kid will get his starts but I doubt it will be every game. Actually, I would be surprised if it was as much as half the games. Most games he has started in a season is 19. This is his third year. If he starts 42 games that would be more than double. Lets face it. The kid is still lost on the court on defense. Did you see that last USA game he played. He left him man to double team a guard at the line and left Chandler open under the hoop after Chandler had just tips out a rebound from the same spot. We saw how that ended. Ally op. Game over. There is a different between needing to tweak your technique and being totally lost about what your coach wants you to do. See Nick. Another freak athlete at a position we needed who didn't start.

He didn't make a USA team that was desperate for another big for the same reason Gil didnt make the team. He doesn't know how to play D and he plays his own offensive game to much.

Return to Washington Wizards