ImageImageImageImageImage

SoTD: Bargnani's defensive numbers over 4 years

Moderators: Morris_Shatford, 7 Footer, DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX

Ripp
General Manager
Posts: 9,269
And1: 324
Joined: Dec 27, 2009

Re: SoTD: Bargnani's defensive numbers over 4 years 

Post#21 » by Ripp » Fri Aug 20, 2010 6:45 pm

jonny three time wrote:So his defense has regressed every season.....

Ya, this is why stats shouldn't be taken too seriously


As others have stated, transitioning from a bench to a starting role puts a lot more pressure on you defensively. So even if we believe that he may have improved his defense by an epsilon amount, the offensive talent of playing against starters might wash over any defensive improvement...
A Tolkienesque strategy war game made by me: http://www.warlords.co
User avatar
dacrusha
RealGM
Posts: 12,696
And1: 5,418
Joined: Dec 11, 2003
Location: Waiting for Jesse Ventura to show up...
       

Re: SoTD: Bargnani's defensive numbers over 4 years 

Post#22 » by dacrusha » Fri Aug 20, 2010 6:46 pm

jonny three time wrote:So his defense has regressed every season.....

Ya, this is why stats shouldn't be taken too seriously


Are you saying that he has actually improved defensively over the past 4 years?
"If you can’t make a profit, you should sell your team" - Michael Jordan
User avatar
Courtside
RealGM
Posts: 19,460
And1: 14,205
Joined: Jul 25, 2002

Re: SoTD: Bargnani's defensive numbers over 4 years 

Post#23 » by Courtside » Fri Aug 20, 2010 6:46 pm

On their own, the numbers tell us several things. I think we need to see the overall team rating for these 4 years, as well as the other players during those same years.

For example - if the team drtg went from 102 to 106 to 110 to 116 over those same 4 years - then picking one guy out of the bunch while ignoring the others is kinda pointless. Can we take the starters over the past 4 years and do the same on/off numbers, to see if their numbers follow the same pattern? If they do - or don't - it helps us put Andrea's numbers into a more clear context.

Is that hard to do, ss?
Reignman
Banned User
Posts: 19,281
And1: 391
Joined: Aug 12, 2004
Location: 2014 playoffs at the ACC!

Re: SoTD: Bargnani's defensive numbers over 4 years 

Post#24 » by Reignman » Fri Aug 20, 2010 6:52 pm

novi13 wrote:You know, I find it so silly that people take this crap seriously. Are you, through your statistics trying to say Andrea got WORSE defensively each year? Seriously?
I can't stand this numbers crap anymore. Anyone who understands basketball knows that numbers mean so much less than most on this board give them credit for. I bet by numbers, Shareef was a positive player on (W/L)


Actually, I don't need stats to tell me that, Andrea played his best D in the first half of 08/09 playing off the bench behind JO. Once JO was traded and Andrea was starting his defense regressed while his offense improved. Then last year his defense was a mess from the start of the season right to the end of the season and the worst part was that he got the most mins on the team.

Yep, I can definitly see why the stats look that way.
jonny three time
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,952
And1: 3,246
Joined: Jul 24, 2006

Re: SoTD: Bargnani's defensive numbers over 4 years 

Post#25 » by jonny three time » Fri Aug 20, 2010 6:52 pm

dacrusha wrote:
jonny three time wrote:So his defense has regressed every season.....

Ya, this is why stats shouldn't be taken too seriously


Are you saying that he has actually improved defensively over the past 4 years?


Absolutely

Take his second year as an example. The guy couldn't guard his own shadow, was constantly being pulled by Smitch and was dredful for most of the year. Not only that but the team he was on was actually better than the past 2 seasons. Yet the numbers indicate that he was a solid enough defender for the team to get by nearly the same with him on the court or not. Which is nonsense, anyone who followed the team that year could see that the team struggled at both ends for the majority of the time that he played.

Then look at the last 2 seasons, where he's on a weaker team, is visibly a more solid defender, and yet his number regress that much. Come on man, I'm not buying it and it's just another example of one stat that being used to push an agenda.

It's nonsense to think he's regressed as a defender over the past 2 years and also nonsense to think that he's 9 points worse per 100 of a defender than what he was as a rookie.
OvertimeNO
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,884
And1: 1,663
Joined: Aug 17, 2010

Re: SoTD: Bargnani's defensive numbers over 4 years 

Post#26 » by OvertimeNO » Fri Aug 20, 2010 6:55 pm

dacrusha wrote:Are you saying that he has actually improved defensively over the past 4 years?


With a gun to your head, who would you rather guard Dwight Howard: 2010 Bargnani, or 2006 Bargnani?
"If it ain't broke, don't break it." - Charles Oakley
Reignman
Banned User
Posts: 19,281
And1: 391
Joined: Aug 12, 2004
Location: 2014 playoffs at the ACC!

Re: SoTD: Bargnani's defensive numbers over 4 years 

Post#27 » by Reignman » Fri Aug 20, 2010 6:59 pm

jonny three time wrote:
dacrusha wrote:
jonny three time wrote:So his defense has regressed every season.....

Ya, this is why stats shouldn't be taken too seriously


Are you saying that he has actually improved defensively over the past 4 years?


Absolutely

Take his second year as an example. The guy couldn't guard his own shadow, was constantly being pulled by Smitch and was dredful for most of the year. Not only that but the team he was on was actually better than the past 2 seasons. Yet the numbers indicate that he was a solid enough defender for the team to get by nearly the same with him on the court or not. Which is nonsense, anyone who followed the team that year could see that the team struggled at both ends for the majority of the time that he played.

Then look at the last 2 seasons, where he's on a weaker team, is visibly a more solid defender, and yet his number regress that much. Come on man, I'm not buying it and it's just another example of one stat that being used to push an agenda.

It's nonsense to think he's regressed as a defender over the past 2 years and also nonsense to think that he's 9 points worse per 100 of a defender than what he was as a rookie.[/quote]

Why is it nonsense? His already bad-defense was exasperated by his increased offensive role and going from the bench to the starting lineup. Seems like common sense to me.
Reignman
Banned User
Posts: 19,281
And1: 391
Joined: Aug 12, 2004
Location: 2014 playoffs at the ACC!

Re: SoTD: Bargnani's defensive numbers over 4 years 

Post#28 » by Reignman » Fri Aug 20, 2010 7:01 pm

OvertimeNO wrote:
dacrusha wrote:Are you saying that he has actually improved defensively over the past 4 years?


With a gun to your head, who would you rather guard Dwight Howard: 2010 Bargnani, or 2006 Bargnani?


Well in 2006 he was playing off the bench and was probably about 20-30 lbs lighter.
User avatar
dacrusha
RealGM
Posts: 12,696
And1: 5,418
Joined: Dec 11, 2003
Location: Waiting for Jesse Ventura to show up...
       

Re: SoTD: Bargnani's defensive numbers over 4 years 

Post#29 » by dacrusha » Fri Aug 20, 2010 7:02 pm

jonny three time wrote:
dacrusha wrote:
jonny three time wrote:So his defense has regressed every season.....

Ya, this is why stats shouldn't be taken too seriously


Are you saying that he has actually improved defensively over the past 4 years?


Absolutely

Take his second year as an example. The guy couldn't guard his own shadow, was constantly being pulled by Smitch and was dredful for most of the year. Not only that but the team he was on was actually better than the past 2 seasons. Yet the numbers indicate that he was a solid enough defender for the team to get by nearly the same with him on the court or not. Which is nonsense, anyone who followed the team that year could see that the team struggled at both ends for the majority of the time that he played.

Then look at the last 2 seasons, where he's on a weaker team, is visibly a more solid defender, and yet his number regress that much. Come on man, I'm not buying it and it's just another example of one stat that being used to push an agenda.

It's nonsense to think he's regressed as a defender over the past 2 years and also nonsense to think that he's 9 points worse per 100 of a defender than what he was as a rookie.


One stat? This past year his DRTG, BLK%, STL% and DRB% all went down as compared to 2008-09. And no, visably he has not become a more solid defender. Did you miss the layup drills that took place game after game after game last year?
"If you can’t make a profit, you should sell your team" - Michael Jordan
MrBojangelz71
Banned User
Posts: 6,835
And1: 929
Joined: Oct 24, 2006
Location: Center of the World

Re: SoTD: Bargnani's defensive numbers over 4 years 

Post#30 » by MrBojangelz71 » Fri Aug 20, 2010 7:05 pm

Courtside wrote:On their own, the numbers tell us several things. I think we need to see the overall team rating for these 4 years, as well as the other players during those same years.

For example - if the team drtg went from 102 to 106 to 110 to 116 over those same 4 years - then picking one guy out of the bunch while ignoring the others is kinda pointless. Can we take the starters over the past 4 years and do the same on/off numbers, to see if their numbers follow the same pattern? If they do - or don't - it helps us put Andrea's numbers into a more clear context.

Is that hard to do, ss?


Agreed.

Problem is our starting unit has changed so much over this span, you would be taking players' numbers from their previous teams and comparing that to their numbers with us, which is pointless.
OvertimeNO
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,884
And1: 1,663
Joined: Aug 17, 2010

Re: SoTD: Bargnani's defensive numbers over 4 years 

Post#31 » by OvertimeNO » Fri Aug 20, 2010 7:06 pm

Reignman wrote:Well in 2006 he was playing off the bench and was probably about 20-30 lbs lighter.


With a gun to your head, who would you rather guard Dwight Howard: 2010 Bargnani, or 2006 Bargnani?
"If it ain't broke, don't break it." - Charles Oakley
andreafan
Banned User
Posts: 1,782
And1: 1
Joined: May 01, 2010
Location: somewhere in canada ,not sure

Re: SoTD: Bargnani's defensive numbers over 4 years 

Post#32 » by andreafan » Fri Aug 20, 2010 7:07 pm

So ss, we would of won 46.3 games last year with a frontcourt of reggie evans and amir johnson with chris bosh injured. I told you before that stats are not the be all and end all . You just started another andrea bashing thread congradulations. :roll:
Reignman
Banned User
Posts: 19,281
And1: 391
Joined: Aug 12, 2004
Location: 2014 playoffs at the ACC!

Re: SoTD: Bargnani's defensive numbers over 4 years 

Post#33 » by Reignman » Fri Aug 20, 2010 7:10 pm

OvertimeNO wrote:
Reignman wrote:Well in 2006 he was playing off the bench and was probably about 20-30 lbs lighter.


With a gun to your head, who would you rather guard Dwight Howard: 2010 Bargnani, or 2006 Bargnani?


I'll take the bigger guy, but that doesn't mean his defense improved.

Edit: Just to clarify I don't think many people have an issue with his man D, which is the scenario you laid out, it's really the help side D that is the concern.
Local_NG_Idiot
RealGM
Posts: 11,587
And1: 3,563
Joined: Apr 24, 2003

Re: SoTD: Bargnani's defensive numbers over 4 years 

Post#34 » by Local_NG_Idiot » Fri Aug 20, 2010 7:10 pm

OvertimeNO wrote:
Reignman wrote:Well in 2006 he was playing off the bench and was probably about 20-30 lbs lighter.


With a gun to your head, who would you rather guard Dwight Howard: 2010 Bargnani, or 2006 Bargnani?


Get beat up, out muscled, dunked on continuously, and outrebounded for 35 minutes OR stand out at the 3pt line, guard against the drive and contest long range shots for 35 minutes......

Gosh, that's a tough call.

Edit: woops, mis-interpreted your question, thought you were asking who I'd rather guard if I had a gun to my head.
OvertimeNO
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,884
And1: 1,663
Joined: Aug 17, 2010

Re: SoTD: Bargnani's defensive numbers over 4 years 

Post#35 » by OvertimeNO » Fri Aug 20, 2010 7:11 pm

Local_NG_Idiot wrote:Get beat up, out muscled, dunked on continuously, and outrebounded for 35 minutes OR stand out at the 3pt line, guard against the drive and contest long range shots for 35 minutes......

Gosh, that's a tough call.


With a gun to your head, who would you rather guard Dwight Howard: 2010 Bargnani, or 2006 Bargnani?
"If it ain't broke, don't break it." - Charles Oakley
Pchu
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,972
And1: 230
Joined: Jun 25, 2004

Re: SoTD: Bargnani's defensive numbers over 4 years 

Post#36 » by Pchu » Fri Aug 20, 2010 7:12 pm

His numbers were better in his first 2 seasons, is probably due to the fact that he was surrounded by better defensive players.

Just a theory anyway.
Reignman
Banned User
Posts: 19,281
And1: 391
Joined: Aug 12, 2004
Location: 2014 playoffs at the ACC!

Re: SoTD: Bargnani's defensive numbers over 4 years 

Post#37 » by Reignman » Fri Aug 20, 2010 7:13 pm

andreafan wrote:So ss, we would of won 46.3 games last year with a frontcourt of reggie evans and amir johnson with chris bosh injured. I told you before that stats are not the be all and end all . You just started another andrea bashing thread congradulations. :roll:


Don't look at it like that, put it in context. His defense has clearly been bad, if you watch the Raps you'll know that immediately. This just points us in that same direction.
Reignman
Banned User
Posts: 19,281
And1: 391
Joined: Aug 12, 2004
Location: 2014 playoffs at the ACC!

Re: SoTD: Bargnani's defensive numbers over 4 years 

Post#38 » by Reignman » Fri Aug 20, 2010 7:14 pm

Pchu wrote:His numbers were better in his first 2 seasons, is probably due to the fact that he was surrounded by better defensive players.

Just a theory anyway.


And he came off the bench and he wasn't playing as many mins.
Local_NG_Idiot
RealGM
Posts: 11,587
And1: 3,563
Joined: Apr 24, 2003

Re: SoTD: Bargnani's defensive numbers over 4 years 

Post#39 » by Local_NG_Idiot » Fri Aug 20, 2010 7:18 pm

Reignman wrote:
Pchu wrote:His numbers were better in his first 2 seasons, is probably due to the fact that he was surrounded by better defensive players.

Just a theory anyway.


And he came off the bench and he wasn't playing as many mins.


And his first 2 years was the Smitch defensive system vs. the Triano defensive system.

plus on/off relies on who's subbing in for him: 1st 2 years: Bosh, Hump, Brezec, Rasho. last 2 years: JO, Amir, Reggie, Pops.
andreafan
Banned User
Posts: 1,782
And1: 1
Joined: May 01, 2010
Location: somewhere in canada ,not sure

Re: SoTD: Bargnani's defensive numbers over 4 years 

Post#40 » by andreafan » Fri Aug 20, 2010 7:19 pm

i direct you to the latvia italy thread andrea is tearing it up. :o

Return to Toronto Raptors