swisscheeseD wrote:I'm glad you can be a sport about it Knicks1214, that's what I respect about you. Thanks for offering up my squad, you didn't have to do that...no really...please...they're all yours!
Thanks for that. It's too stupid to get annoyed online...people can debate and whatnot, but no reason to get touchy. At least, that's what I feel lol. Np for offering it back...it was yours initially so if you wanted it back, it was all yours. Haha, thanks for letting me keep the team
About my Brand selection...
I knew it was the controversial pick, believe me. I've explained it NUMEROUS times. Taking on that contract wasn't an issue simply because of how far under the cap my team was to that point. Brand was the BEST FIT ON THE BOARD WITH THE HIGHEST REWARD, simple as that. Pop loves him a banger at the 4 who can play with his back to the basket and hit the midrange J. I know many of you guys understand the game, it just boggles the mind that some couldn't see Brand was in the perfect position to succeed on this roster, especially with Pop putting himself in the position to obtain that level of success. He was tailor made for that ROLE, don't let the contract blind you.
I guess. But why not get a player with potential like Hill and then wait a few rounds to get someone like Kurt Thomas, (Ben Wallace/Jason Maxiell-not much offense from either), Drew Gooden, or take a flier on Mozgov? When he's healthy, he's a good fit on most NBA teams, but he hasn't been healthy in a while. However, I do agree that he would fit with Pop's game plan...especially with Pop's ability to keep his players healthy throughout the regular season to keep them fresh for the post season. However, with Brand's knees and inability to stay healthy during the regular season, I doubt Pops could do much.
Now, not only do you have Brand's salary...but you took on BG and Bargs' contracts too. This team is now destined for mediocrity (hence the IT award), with questionable character.
Like I said before, BG's contract was kinda forced upon me if I wanted Bargs (who I still feel really fits next to Horford). People need to remember that Bargs is actually a good low post defender.
http://sonicscentral.com/apbrmetrics/vi ... 2cebaee61dIn fact, he allowed only .8 ppp last season which was 14th best in the NBA. Not to mention they only shot 42% against him. Horford and Bargs actually form a very formidable defensive combination at the 4/5 positions.
You may not agree with the Lopez selection, which is fine...but if you remember in the last BAT, he was on the team that you took over and I tired everything in my power to obtain his services. RoLo is most definitely a favorite of mine, and fit with my young/tough/high IQ talent I decided to build my foundation on. I knew that I was going to target another 4 (Blair/Brand) that would require minutes, sliding Horford to the 5 and rounding out a solid big rotation. Yes, Rolo is an energy guy...but his energy is just as essential in the starting lineup as it was off the bench. Not to mention I had other guys in Dragic and Childress who could spark some energy off the bench, and Tony Allen infusing some defensive intensity as well.
I remember, trust me lol. I'm just not that high on using him as a starter...he's more of a second team player to me; but to each his own.
But like I said, it's your squad now...Do you. I hope you continue to make moves and mold it into the team that suits your style. Obviously mine is just very different than yours. But to each their own.
There will be more moves...I think I have a good team now with some holes and bad contracts that I obviously have to fix, but in the end, I think the plan I have for the team will work out.