John Wall Vs.

Moderators: Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier

juror1
Banned User
Posts: 1,089
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 16, 2010
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

John Wall Vs. 

Post#1 » by juror1 » Thu Aug 26, 2010 7:08 pm

Does anyone else believe that John Wall easily has the potential to be the best point guard in the league in the next couple years?

He's as athletic as they come, his basketball IQ and general intelligence is better than most, he has a better midrange game coming into the league than guys like Rondo and Rose, and he's a great passer.

He's got it all. Looking at the next generation of point guards I would compare Wall in this way:
-The intelligence of Rondo
-The quickness of Rose
-The leadership/intensity of Chris Paul
-His passing game is the area he's on his own, he's not necessarily the best, but it's the area he can be like John Wall.

What do you think.
User avatar
Jvaughn
RealGM
Posts: 28,149
And1: 4,705
Joined: May 18, 2009
   

Re: John Wall Vs. 

Post#2 » by Jvaughn » Thu Aug 26, 2010 7:18 pm

I absolutely do not. I think the ESPN hype machine wants it to seem that way, but he has a lot of work to do. I believe he has all-star potential, but I don't see superstar in him.

Intelligence of Rondo- No, not many do

Quickness of Rose- No, he has nice speed, but he's not as quick or fast as Rose

Leadership of Paul-Absolutely not. Couldn't lead that super talented team to the win, and he hasn't played in the NBA yet, so that's way too premature

I want to see this guy be successful and efficient for at least one full season before we start trying to crown him already. He still has to pass CP3, D-Wil, Nash, Rose, Rondo, and Billups to get there, and that's a huge feat to overcome.
spearsy23 wrote:Kobe is a low percentage chucker just like Jennings, he's just better at it.


teamCHItown wrote:Now we have threads on what violent felons think of our Bulls. Great. Next up, OJ Simpson's take on a possible Taj Gibson extension.
User avatar
X-Factor
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,296
And1: 34
Joined: Aug 02, 2010
Location: Trinidad and Tobago
     

Re: John Wall Vs. 

Post#3 » by X-Factor » Thu Aug 26, 2010 7:24 pm

John Wall is arguably the most hyped PG to ever come into the NBA, but I don't see him living up to that hype at all. He'll never pass CP3's, D-Will's and D-Rose's peak potential IMO so no he'd never be the best in the game.
Be peaceful, be courteous, obey the law, respect everyone; but if someone puts his hand on you, send him to the cemetery.
Malcolm X
User avatar
Ron Harper
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,309
And1: 9
Joined: Jun 26, 2010

Re: John Wall Vs. 

Post#4 » by Ron Harper » Thu Aug 26, 2010 7:30 pm

He has not played a single game.
Keith Bogans does his job. Boo Hoo. You want him to quit?
User avatar
Wharton Alum 08
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,814
And1: 335
Joined: Apr 02, 2009

Re: John Wall Vs. 

Post#5 » by Wharton Alum 08 » Thu Aug 26, 2010 7:32 pm

I can see it he's got a bunch of pieces that fit him especially if Gilbert is willing to defer. With Blatche and McGee, John Wall will put up some gaudy #'s early. And if SL is any indication Wall will get a lot of whistles this year. If he doesn't get those I can see him struggling in terms of FG% though. I just thinks he needs to slow down a little he's always going 100 mph but he'll learn to change gears.
andrewww
General Manager
Posts: 7,989
And1: 2,687
Joined: Jul 26, 2006

Re: John Wall Vs. 

Post#6 » by andrewww » Thu Aug 26, 2010 7:50 pm

i havent seen wall play yet so i'll reserve judgment until then. but by all accounts, if he is a derrick rose clone or similar to him, i would say no (derrick rose imo is one of the most overrated players in the league).
User avatar
Wade2k6
RealGM
Posts: 15,104
And1: 77
Joined: May 29, 2004
 

Re: John Wall Vs. 

Post#7 » by Wade2k6 » Thu Aug 26, 2010 8:05 pm

X-Factor wrote:John Wall is arguably the most hyped PG to ever come into the NBA, but I don't see him living up to that hype at all. He'll never pass CP3's, D-Will's and D-Rose's peak potential IMO so no he'd never be the best in the game.

Why not? He has better length and equal athleticism as Rose. Callipari has said he was further along as a freshmen then both Rose and Evans, what makes you think his ceiling is any lower then Rose?
User avatar
Jvaughn
RealGM
Posts: 28,149
And1: 4,705
Joined: May 18, 2009
   

Re: John Wall Vs. 

Post#8 » by Jvaughn » Thu Aug 26, 2010 8:08 pm

Wade2k6 wrote:
X-Factor wrote:John Wall is arguably the most hyped PG to ever come into the NBA, but I don't see him living up to that hype at all. He'll never pass CP3's, D-Will's and D-Rose's peak potential IMO so no he'd never be the best in the game.

Why not? He has better length and equal athleticism as Rose. Callipari has said he was further along as a freshmen then both Rose and Evans, what makes you think his ceiling is any lower then Rose?


This athleticism thing is getting old. There is nothing equal about Rose and Wall athletically. Rose is a better leaper, is faster, and has better handle on the ball. Wall is a good athlete, but outside of being fast, there's no comparison.

And why wouldn't Calipari say that? If Wall does well in the league, it just makes him look better. If Rose or Evans came out after Wall I guarantee he'd say the same thing about them.
spearsy23 wrote:Kobe is a low percentage chucker just like Jennings, he's just better at it.


teamCHItown wrote:Now we have threads on what violent felons think of our Bulls. Great. Next up, OJ Simpson's take on a possible Taj Gibson extension.
User avatar
Jvaughn
RealGM
Posts: 28,149
And1: 4,705
Joined: May 18, 2009
   

Re: John Wall Vs. 

Post#9 » by Jvaughn » Thu Aug 26, 2010 8:08 pm

andrewww wrote:i havent seen wall play yet so i'll reserve judgment until then. but by all accounts, if he is a derrick rose clone or similar to him, i would say no (derrick rose imo is one of the most overrated players in the league).


Would be interested to see where you rank Rose in PG's and where he ranks overall in the league.
spearsy23 wrote:Kobe is a low percentage chucker just like Jennings, he's just better at it.


teamCHItown wrote:Now we have threads on what violent felons think of our Bulls. Great. Next up, OJ Simpson's take on a possible Taj Gibson extension.
User avatar
cl24
Freshman
Posts: 96
And1: 140
Joined: Aug 26, 2010

Re: John Wall Vs. 

Post#10 » by cl24 » Thu Aug 26, 2010 8:10 pm

He's so overrated and I think he'll be sort of like Devin Harris. I don't see him being with Deron/CP3/Nash category.
Keep Our Kings!
User avatar
Wade2k6
RealGM
Posts: 15,104
And1: 77
Joined: May 29, 2004
 

Re: John Wall Vs. 

Post#11 » by Wade2k6 » Thu Aug 26, 2010 8:18 pm

Jvaughn wrote:
Wade2k6 wrote:
X-Factor wrote:John Wall is arguably the most hyped PG to ever come into the NBA, but I don't see him living up to that hype at all. He'll never pass CP3's, D-Will's and D-Rose's peak potential IMO so no he'd never be the best in the game.

Why not? He has better length and equal athleticism as Rose. Callipari has said he was further along as a freshmen then both Rose and Evans, what makes you think his ceiling is any lower then Rose?


This athleticism thing is getting old. There is nothing equal about Rose and Wall athletically. Rose is a better leaper, is faster, and has better handle on the ball. Wall is a good athlete, but outside of being fast, there's no comparison.

And why wouldn't Calipari say that? If Wall does well in the league, it just makes him look better. If Rose or Evans came out after Wall I guarantee he'd say the same thing about them.

Rose
No step vert: 34.0
No step vert reach: 11 '1
Max vert: 40.0
Max vert reach: 11 ' 6.5
Agility: 11.69
Sprint: 3.05

Wall:
No step vert: 30.0
No step vert reach: 10 ' 11.75
Max vert: 39.0
Max vert reach: 11 ' 8.25
Agility: 10.84
Sprint: 3.14

The two most important leaping categories are max vertical reach and no step vertical reach. Wall has a slight advantage in max vertical reach and Rose has a slight advantage in no step vertical reach. Wall has a considerable advantage in the agility drill, while Rose has a slight advantage in the sprint. I wouldn't exactly say "their is nothing equal Rose and Wall athletically."
User avatar
Jvaughn
RealGM
Posts: 28,149
And1: 4,705
Joined: May 18, 2009
   

Re: John Wall Vs. 

Post#12 » by Jvaughn » Thu Aug 26, 2010 8:26 pm

Wade2k6 wrote:
Jvaughn wrote:
Wade2k6 wrote:Why not? He has better length and equal athleticism as Rose. Callipari has said he was further along as a freshmen then both Rose and Evans, what makes you think his ceiling is any lower then Rose?


This athleticism thing is getting old. There is nothing equal about Rose and Wall athletically. Rose is a better leaper, is faster, and has better handle on the ball. Wall is a good athlete, but outside of being fast, there's no comparison.

And why wouldn't Calipari say that? If Wall does well in the league, it just makes him look better. If Rose or Evans came out after Wall I guarantee he'd say the same thing about them.

Rose
No step vert: 34.0
No step vert reach: 11 '1
Max vert: 40.0
Max vert reach: 11 ' 6.5
Agility: 11.69
Sprint: 3.05

Wall:
No step vert: 30.0
No step vert reach: 10 ' 11.75
Max vert: 39.0
Max vert reach: 11 ' 8.25
Agility: 10.84
Sprint: 3.14

The two most important leaping categories are max vertical reach and no step vertical reach. Wall has a slight advantage in max vertical reach and Rose has a slight advantage in no step vertical reach. Wall has a considerable advantage in the agility drill, while Rose has a slight advantage in the sprint. I wouldn't exactly say "their is nothing equal Rose and Wall athletically."


No step vert: 33.5
No step vert reach: 10.8
Max vert: 42
Max vert reach: 11.45
Agility: 11.07
Sprint: 3.17

You know who that is? Jordan Farmar. Is he also on the athletic level of Rose. Performing well in combine drills and in the game athleticism are two different things. Rose is the better athlete and in a tier above Wall.
spearsy23 wrote:Kobe is a low percentage chucker just like Jennings, he's just better at it.


teamCHItown wrote:Now we have threads on what violent felons think of our Bulls. Great. Next up, OJ Simpson's take on a possible Taj Gibson extension.
User avatar
Wade2k6
RealGM
Posts: 15,104
And1: 77
Joined: May 29, 2004
 

Re: John Wall Vs. 

Post#13 » by Wade2k6 » Thu Aug 26, 2010 8:31 pm

Way to pick and choose players to try to validate your argument. Wall is on Rose's level athletically. They have similar leaping numbers (ones that actually matter, not max vertical that doesn't take into account length) and have similar sprint/agility numbers. To say Wall isn't on Rose' level athletically is flat-out wrong IMO.
TAI8
Banned User
Posts: 7,205
And1: 5
Joined: May 14, 2005

Re: John Wall Vs. 

Post#14 » by TAI8 » Thu Aug 26, 2010 8:32 pm

No. He sucks. I'm going to enjoy watching him fail.
User avatar
Wharton Alum 08
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,814
And1: 335
Joined: Apr 02, 2009

Re: John Wall Vs. 

Post#15 » by Wharton Alum 08 » Thu Aug 26, 2010 8:38 pm

Wade2k6 wrote:Way to pick and choose players to try to validate your argument. Wall is on Rose's level athletically. They have similar leaping numbers (ones that actually matter, not max vertical that doesn't take into account length) and have similar sprint/agility numbers. To say Wall isn't on Rose' level athletically is flat-out wrong IMO.



They're very similar Wall is just so long he lacks Rose's strength at the moment. In the open floor Wall seems faster but in terms of leaping and body control from the eye test Rose looks more explosive.
User avatar
Jvaughn
RealGM
Posts: 28,149
And1: 4,705
Joined: May 18, 2009
   

Re: John Wall Vs. 

Post#16 » by Jvaughn » Thu Aug 26, 2010 8:39 pm

Wade2k6 wrote:Way to pick and choose players to try to validate your argument. Wall is on Rose's level athletically. They have similar leaping numbers (ones that actually matter, not max vertical that doesn't take into account length) and have similar sprint/agility numbers. To say Wall isn't on Rose' level athletically is flat-out wrong IMO.


I used your argument to show that it had no validation. Rose is an athletic freak. Wall is an above average athlete. There is a difference.
spearsy23 wrote:Kobe is a low percentage chucker just like Jennings, he's just better at it.


teamCHItown wrote:Now we have threads on what violent felons think of our Bulls. Great. Next up, OJ Simpson's take on a possible Taj Gibson extension.
User avatar
Wharton Alum 08
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,814
And1: 335
Joined: Apr 02, 2009

Re: John Wall Vs. 

Post#17 » by Wharton Alum 08 » Thu Aug 26, 2010 8:44 pm

Jvaughn wrote:
Wade2k6 wrote:Way to pick and choose players to try to validate your argument. Wall is on Rose's level athletically. They have similar leaping numbers (ones that actually matter, not max vertical that doesn't take into account length) and have similar sprint/agility numbers. To say Wall isn't on Rose' level athletically is flat-out wrong IMO.


I used your argument to show that it had no validation. Rose is an athletic freak. Wall is an above average athlete. There is a difference.


You're reaching Wall is an athletic freak as well. The hype that he has as a better athlete than Rose is incorrect though. I think this vid says it all.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vCJHcBrl_aM[/youtube]
Amare_1_Knicks
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,529
And1: 3,424
Joined: Aug 07, 2010

Re: John Wall Vs. 

Post#18 » by Amare_1_Knicks » Thu Aug 26, 2010 8:44 pm

jayks1 wrote:Does anyone else believe that John Wall easily has the potential to be the best point guard in the league in the next couple years?

He's as athletic as they come, his basketball IQ and general intelligence is better than most, he has a better midrange game coming into the league than guys like Rondo and Rose, and he's a great passer.

He's got it all. Looking at the next generation of point guards I would compare Wall in this way:
-The intelligence of Rondo
-The quickness of Rose
-The leadership/intensity of Chris Paul
-His passing game is the area he's on his own, he's not necessarily the best, but it's the area he can be like John Wall.

What do you think.


He's not as intelligent as Rondo is. Not now at least. Rondo had the opportunity of playing with 3 of the NBA's best players at the same time as the starting point guard. It took time for him to develop to this level he's at now, and Wall isn't going to come out of college making plays like Rondo does now. Same for being a leader.
User avatar
Wade2k6
RealGM
Posts: 15,104
And1: 77
Joined: May 29, 2004
 

Re: John Wall Vs. 

Post#19 » by Wade2k6 » Thu Aug 26, 2010 8:48 pm

edit
User avatar
Wade2k6
RealGM
Posts: 15,104
And1: 77
Joined: May 29, 2004
 

Re: John Wall Vs. 

Post#20 » by Wade2k6 » Thu Aug 26, 2010 8:49 pm

Jvaughn wrote:
Wade2k6 wrote:Way to pick and choose players to try to validate your argument. Wall is on Rose's level athletically. They have similar leaping numbers (ones that actually matter, not max vertical that doesn't take into account length) and have similar sprint/agility numbers. To say Wall isn't on Rose' level athletically is flat-out wrong IMO.


I used your argument to show that it had no validation. Rose is an athletic freak. Wall is an above average athlete. There is a difference.

It didn't show anything though. I don't think max vertical jump is significant at all because it doesn't take into account a players length. The only category that Farmer beats either of these players in is agility where he beats Rose 11.07 to 11.69. His no step vertical reach is 3+ inches lower then Wall and Rose, and his maximum vertical reach 2 inches lower then Rose and 4 inches lower then Wall. If you can't tell the difference between Wall/Rose and Farmer athletically there is no point in continuing this argument.

To your 2nd point, Wall is an athletic freak as well. To say he's just "an above average athlete" is downplaying Walls athleticism, because Wall does have a slight advantage in some of the significant categories of the combine over Rose, just like Rose has a slight advantage in other significant categories of the combine over Wall.

Return to Player Comparisons