Jay From LA wrote:lets just simplify it and say, inb4 fans
You know, I was actually about to start quoting you every time someone made a funny post and just posting this:
Jay From LA wrote:i lol'd
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
Jay From LA wrote:lets just simplify it and say, inb4 fans
Jay From LA wrote:i lol'd

gi4c2om0 wrote:Jay From LA wrote:lets just simplify it and say, inb4 fans
You know, I was actually about to start quoting you every time someone made a funny post and just posting this:Jay From LA wrote:i lol'd
I start noticing patterns and feel this nagging urge to call people out on it, hoping to create humour. It's in my nature.
KF10 wrote:I like Jennings.
There is critical flaws in his game that keeps him out of the discussion as being a top PG in the L in the future. Some flaws are:
-Inconsistent jumper mechanics (other than his three point shot which is fairly accurate, everything else was pretty bad. Nearly Evans' broken jumpshot-bad).
-Too skinny.
-One of the worst finishers around the rim.
-Gets shot happy at times.
-5.7 assists per game is a good start but needs to bump that up if he is continuing to be a traditional PG-type player. (A guy like Evans averaged 5.8 apg and most people think he is a complete ball stopper *not true*)
-Inconsistent concentrated effort in defense (I like when Jennings is focused playing defense at a particular times but when he is not focused, his defense is not too great).
-Shot a low FG% (Shot selection may attribute this but I believe this is more of his mechanics).
If Jennings can fix at least 3/7 of these flaws, IMO he is going to be very good.
I'd say 1, 3, and 6 are pretty damn important characteristics. But ya as of now he's still raw, but even a Bulls fan can see there's some potential there.

Blackmun wrote:I don't think he has the right stuff, mentally speaking, to become great.
koko wrote:YFZblu wrote:koko wrote:I want to F Navarro. Do him some nasty things.
Watchin him play makes me horny. Deal with it, i did.
Blackmun wrote:I don't think he has the right stuff, mentally speaking, to become great.
No one said a team with Jennings as its best player would win a title. Even DWade showed you that. But he can make others better and in the Eastern Conference come you can come pretty darn close.knicksup19 wrote:So he is working on all around game which i think he should a better right hand will make him a tough cover and defense is always key.. Next year he should focus solely on his shooting touch
Anyhow i think is max ceiling is a tony parker. And a team with BJ as there best player will never win a title.
5 all star games..
joeyAdaMan wrote:skones wrote:Brandon Jennings ceiling is higher than Parker. Parker has been a good player for a long time, but I'm not sure he makes three all-star games if he's not playing next to Duncan for his whole career.
+ 1
manou wrote:joeyAdaMan wrote:skones wrote:Brandon Jennings ceiling is higher than Parker. Parker has been a good player for a long time, but I'm not sure he makes three all-star games if he's not playing next to Duncan for his whole career.
+ 1
Come on now... Parker was all nba 3rd team in 2009, he basically put the spurs on his back and pushed them all season long. Duncan was always annoyed with injuries, Manu didn't have his mojo, and Parker was basically unstoppable. He averaged 22-7 in just 34 minutes, had a 55-7-10 game... Many people forget how great he can be, because of the last season where he always played with minor injuries.
Prime Jennings better than Prime Parker? I'm really not sure he can. He has A LOT of work to do on his FG% then.
PrinceJames wrote:To me Jennings was the hardest rookie last year to guage his full potential. He seems like he could be a good pg but I cant see him being a allstar consistenyl with rose and rondo in the east