Danilo Gallinari vs. Brook Lopez

Post #61 » by **mopper8** » Thu Sep 2, 2010 11:16 pm

TheOUTLAW wrote:I think without question Lopez is the better player. I'm baffled how quickly this poll went from Lopez in a big way to Gallinari.

viewtopic.php?f=24&t=1050439

304 views

Post #62 » by **Luv those Knicks** » Thu Sep 2, 2010 11:23 pm

Ron Harper wrote:lol you knick fans are shameless

You're the reason my signature stays.

YounG_A · Post #63 » by **YounG_A** » Thu Sep 2, 2010 11:29 pm

it's not even close....Brook Lopez is the way better player.

Post #64 » by **coldfish** » Thu Sep 2, 2010 11:33 pm

LOL. This can't be serious. Not only is Lopez better than Gallo, I don't know how you can seriously debate anything to the contrary.

PER
Lopez 20.1
Gallinari 14.8
That doesn't take into account that Lopez plays a more valuable position. Note: Patrick Ewing wasn't this productive in his second year. Is there one single Knicks fan who would take Gallinari over Ewing?

How is this possibly a discussion?

ipoopinmypants · Post #65 » by **ipoopinmypants** » Thu Sep 2, 2010 11:33 pm

Luv those Knicks wrote:
Ron Harper wrote:lol you knick fans are shameless

You're the reason my signature stays.

And your signature is the reason you have no cred except in the Knicks board. :nonono:

^ coldfish to the rescue!! :lol:

ipoopinmypants · Post #66 » by **ipoopinmypants** » Thu Sep 2, 2010 11:37 pm

mopper8 wrote:
TheOUTLAW wrote:I think without question Lopez is the better player. I'm baffled how quickly this poll went from Lopez in a big way to Gallinari.

viewtopic.php?f=24&t=1050439

304 views

I don't think "pathetic" is an adequate description of this scenario.

*thanks god that Lebron went to Miami*

Post #67 » by **Luv those Knicks** » Thu Sep 2, 2010 11:39 pm

coldfish wrote:LOL. This can't be serious. Not only is Lopez better than Gallo, I don't know how you can seriously debate anything to the contrary.

PER
Lopez 20.1
Gallinari 14.8
That doesn't take into account that Lopez plays a more valuable position. Note: Patrick Ewing wasn't this productive in his second year. Is there one single Knicks fan who would take Gallinari over Ewing?

How is this possibly a discussion?

As I said, it's a wait and see. I'd be happy to revisit this in the middle of the year.

Guy986 · Post #68 » by **Guy986** » Thu Sep 2, 2010 11:41 pm

Lopez is better right now. There is no discussion really.

Guy986 · Post #69 » by **Guy986** » Thu Sep 2, 2010 11:45 pm

Brook Lopez is almost guaranteed to get 19/9/2/2 or better this upcoming years with a PER of 20+. That is all star level production at the C position.

For Gallo to have a better season, he will have to put up 23/8/5 or something while maintaining a high PER and a high TS%. Not really easy to do.

X-Factor · Post #70 » by **X-Factor** » Thu Sep 2, 2010 11:48 pm

Luvthoseknicks?

That is hands down without a shadow of a doubt the most pathetic childish thing i've seen a poster do. SMDH @ you. Wow :eek2:

Post #71 » by **Luv those Knicks** » Fri Sep 3, 2010 12:01 am

X-Factor wrote:Luvthoseknicks?

That is hands down without a shadow of a doubt the most pathetic childish thing i've seen a poster do. SMDH @ you. Wow

They say there's no such thing as bad publicity.

Besides, 5 months from now, my sig might be true and I'll look like the smart one. :-)

but, I'm glad that I gave you the opportunity to feel superior to somebody.

Post #72 » by **Luv those Knicks** » Fri Sep 3, 2010 12:03 am

Guy986 wrote:Brook Lopez is almost guaranteed to get 19/9/2/2 or better this upcoming years with a PER of 20+. That is all star level production at the C position.

For Gallo to have a better season, he will have to put up 23/8/5 or something while maintaining a high PER and a high TS%. Not really easy to do.

and for Lopez's team to win as many games as gallo's team, he'd have to put up something like 36/15/4. If he does that, the nets might win 45 games and make the playoffs.

anywho - I said from the getgo that it was a bad comparison. that's my real feeling on this one.

Guy986 · Post #73 » by **Guy986** » Fri Sep 3, 2010 12:04 am

I've found a better comparison for Gallo.

PER 36 minutes:

Player A: 16ppg, 5.2rpg, 1.8apg, 42.3%FG, 38.1%3pt, 57.5 TS%, 14.8 PER

Player B: 15.9ppg, 5.3rpg, 2.1apg, 44.1%FG, 36.9%3pt, 54.5 TS%, 14.1 PER

Player A is Danilo Gallinari. Player B is a rookie from last year. Player A is better but really not by much.

answer: Chase Birdinger

Citris · Post #74 » by **Citris** » Fri Sep 3, 2010 12:50 am

Brook Lopez is a very good player.

Gallo is the man -- Check it outttt

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vLD19ypf4uw[/youtube]

etopn23 · Post #75 » by **etopn23** » Fri Sep 3, 2010 1:58 am

TheBigThree wrote:Lopez, easily. Gallo has yet to prove much of anything.

method · Post #76 » by **method** » Fri Sep 3, 2010 3:15 am

We will all see how easy Lopez is better then Gallo about mid season,I bet it wont be as easy as some of you say.

Guy986 · Post #77 » by **Guy986** » Fri Sep 3, 2010 3:51 am

method wrote:We will all see how easy Lopez is better then Gallo about mid season,I bet it wont be as easy as some of you say.

What do you think he's gonna average by mid season?

Lionel Messi · Post #78 » by **Lionel Messi** » Fri Sep 3, 2010 4:30 am

WTF?

How is this even close? Lopez>>>>>>Gallo.

X-Factor · Post #79 » by **X-Factor** » Fri Sep 3, 2010 1:15 pm

Lionel Messi wrote:WTF?

How is this even close? Lopez>>>>>>Gallo.

A pathetic Knicks fan went on their board begging them to vote for Gallo. That how.

-Illmatic- · Post #80 » by **-Illmatic-** » Fri Sep 3, 2010 2:06 pm

Begging for votes on an internet forum....

Who is the better basketball player?