How much would we give up to move to #5-6?
Moderator: chitownsports4ever
How much would we give up to move to #5-6?
- emperorjones
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 4,591
- And1: 133
- Joined: Jun 16, 2006
How much would we give up to move to #5-6?
Just wondering if anyone know what the famous Jimmy Johnson chart would say we'd have to give up to move up 9 or so spots?
Re: How much would we give up to move to #5-6?
- Chewie
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,675
- And1: 336
- Joined: Jul 13, 2007
- Location: Fishhawk, F-L-A.
-
Re: How much would we give up to move to #5-6?
emperorjones wrote:Just wondering if anyone know what the famous Jimmy Johnson chart would say we'd have to give up to move up 9 or so spots?
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/draft06/news/story?id=2410670
If I'm reading this right, the value on the Chiefs' #5 pick is 1,700 which means it would cost our 1st rd pick (1,100) + our 2nd rd pick (460) + our 5th rd pick (37.5).
I'm sure there are countless ways to swap various other picks for both teams and make this work but that's just one consideration. You thinking about McFadden after today's Sun-Times article?
Re: How much would we give up to move to #5-6?
- emperorjones
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 4,591
- And1: 133
- Joined: Jun 16, 2006
Re: How much would we give up to move to #5-6?
Chewie wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/draft06/news/story?id=2410670
If I'm reading this right, the value on the Chiefs' #5 pick is 1,700 which means it would cost our 1st rd pick (1,100) + our 2nd rd pick (460) + our 5th rd pick (37.5).
Interesting. So swapping with the 49ers in the 3rd round was the equivqlent of getting a low 4th round pick.
Re: How much would we give up to move to #5-6?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,667
- And1: 1,094
- Joined: May 29, 2003
- Location: Cliff Levingston is omnipresent.
-
Re: How much would we give up to move to #5-6?
Chewie wrote:http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/draft06/news/story?id=2410670
If I'm reading this right, the value on the Chiefs' #5 pick is 1,700 which means it would cost our 1st rd pick (1,100) + our 2nd rd pick (460) + our 5th rd pick (37.5).
I'm sure there are countless ways to swap various other picks for both teams and make this work but that's just one consideration. You thinking about McFadden after today's Sun-Times article?
If that pick gets us McFadden, it's hard to say no. It's a steep price, but we pick up that star back we need to carry the offense. He still wouldn't have much of a line to run behind, but we could probably find a serviceable guy in the 3rd and maybe 4th round to plug in, or platoon the RT for a year with St. Clair and hope for the best.
Would the Chiefs be open for a deal like that though?
- The Sheik
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,466
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 01, 2006
- Location: Irvine, Ca
-
Chewie wrote:Is #5 the pick we need to trade up to anyway? Don't the Raiders want McFadden at #4 ?
Who the hell knows what the raiders want. They signed Fargas and like him a lot, restructed Rhodes, they really like Michael Bush as well and still have Lamont Jordan. Would they still take a RB, probably. You know AL loves speed, but if I looked at what they need it would be:
1. Chris Long
2. Jake Long
3. Glenn Dorsey
4. Vernon Gholston
5. Sedrick Ellis
6. Darren McFadden
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,667
- And1: 1,094
- Joined: May 29, 2003
- Location: Cliff Levingston is omnipresent.
-
- emperorjones
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 4,591
- And1: 133
- Joined: Jun 16, 2006
Piling up the picks
Bears may recoup losses with bonus draft choices
Dan Pompei | On the NFL
March 23, 2008
http://chicagosports.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/cs-080322-nfl-draft-chicago-bears-dan-pompei,1,671333.column
it is probable they will receive compensatory picks from the NFL. The best guess is they will receive three additional seventh-round picks. Teams that lose unrestricted free agents and don't replace them with other teams' free agents are awarded compensatory picks.



- Chewie
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,675
- And1: 336
- Joined: Jul 13, 2007
- Location: Fishhawk, F-L-A.
-
From that article :
Sooo....the compensatory picks we get for the '08 draft are based on the performance of the free agents we lost last year (Gage, Boone, Scott, Worrell, T Johnson). You wouldn't see any compensation for the losses of Berrian, Gilmore, and Ayanbadejo in terms of draft picks until the '09 draft. At least that's my read...
...picks are determined by the value of the contracts the players they lose sign and their performances in the subsequent season.
Sooo....the compensatory picks we get for the '08 draft are based on the performance of the free agents we lost last year (Gage, Boone, Scott, Worrell, T Johnson). You wouldn't see any compensation for the losses of Berrian, Gilmore, and Ayanbadejo in terms of draft picks until the '09 draft. At least that's my read...
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,334
- And1: 1,754
- Joined: Jun 07, 2002
- Location: Don't question the finger and do respect the black box. That is all.....
Nobody seems really thrilled to be at the top of this draft, I think a team like us could move up without much difficulty. Of course, we would only want to do that if we saw someone we REALLLY wanted. If you see alot of value lower, not alot if differentiation between the top picks, why pay more for equal talent?