Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC
Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC
- ComboGuardCity
- RealGM
- Posts: 26,052
- And1: 4,940
- Joined: Jul 10, 2010
Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC
No matter what you do now, you still misquoted somebody to prove a point that was already dead wrong.
Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC
- paul
- RealGM
- Posts: 32,398
- And1: 1,038
- Joined: Dec 11, 2007
-
Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC
ComboGuardCity wrote:No matter what you do now, you still misquoted somebody to prove a point that was already dead wrong.
Who?
Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC
- Striders
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,281
- And1: 252
- Joined: Nov 30, 2009
Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC
paul wrote:Yeah, again I'd have a look at which fans were leading the charge on that front....
Or you could just read my sig, then laugh.
Er...Capital Edge has made several derogatory comments about Knicks fans. And you yourself insinuated that all Knick fans are homers in the other thread.
Yeah, I know Mil was getting bashed, but don't pretend as if you guys were just defending yourselves.
Success is how high you bounce when you hit bottom. ~George Smith Patton
Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC
-
bklynstoops
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,699
- And1: 1,675
- Joined: Jul 04, 2008
Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC
paul wrote:ComboGuardCity wrote:No matter what you do now, you still misquoted somebody to prove a point that was already dead wrong.
Who?
does it matter? isn't your whole point to lump an entire fanbase together under your silly sig?
trolls.
Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC
- ComboGuardCity
- RealGM
- Posts: 26,052
- And1: 4,940
- Joined: Jul 10, 2010
Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC
To be fair, nobody is going to read his sig if he stays on the Bucks board.
Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC
- Striders
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,281
- And1: 252
- Joined: Nov 30, 2009
Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC
bklynstoops wrote:does it matter? isn't your whole point to lump an entire fanbase together under your silly sig?
trolls.
Jesus Christ. I just looked at their trolling thread.
That's...wow. smh.
Success is how high you bounce when you hit bottom. ~George Smith Patton
Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC
- clownparade
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,388
- And1: 163
- Joined: Jul 12, 2010
-
Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC
Striders wrote:And you yourself insinuated that all Knick fans are homers in the other thread.
no way! people from ny being homers? thats a horrible and unrealistic thing to say! but bashing peoples intelligence and city is fair game
Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC
- paul
- RealGM
- Posts: 32,398
- And1: 1,038
- Joined: Dec 11, 2007
-
Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC
bklynstoops wrote:paul wrote:ComboGuardCity wrote:No matter what you do now, you still misquoted somebody to prove a point that was already dead wrong.
Who?
does it matter? isn't your whole point to lump an entire fanbase together under your silly sig?
trolls.
What? The point of my sig is that it's funny, a guy calling someone else (Please Use More Appropriate Word) and spelling the word incorrectly is funny. I didn't misquote anyone or lump anyone together, nor was I trolling.
Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC
- ComboGuardCity
- RealGM
- Posts: 26,052
- And1: 4,940
- Joined: Jul 10, 2010
Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC
paul wrote:
The best part is the mods backed him up. I thought it would be a bit of fun to have a legit argument about one of their players who they haven't even had time to attach themselves to yet on a bit of a quiet day, I was wrong. That board is, without any exaggeration, batsh*t ****ing crazy..
Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC
- Striders
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,281
- And1: 252
- Joined: Nov 30, 2009
Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC
clownparade wrote:Striders wrote:And you yourself insinuated that all Knick fans are homers in the other thread.
no way! people from ny being homers? thats a horrible and unrealistic thing to say! but bashing peoples intelligence and city is fair game
Already pointed out, good sir.
Striders wrote:Guess not, but it's still getting personal. People insulting entire fanbases, y'know?
Paul, we know you came here to troll, dude.
Success is how high you bounce when you hit bottom. ~George Smith Patton
Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC
- paul
- RealGM
- Posts: 32,398
- And1: 1,038
- Joined: Dec 11, 2007
-
Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC
ComboGuardCity wrote:paul wrote:
The best part is the mods backed him up. I thought it would be a bit of fun to have a legit argument about one of their players who they haven't even had time to attach themselves to yet on a bit of a quiet day, I was wrong. That board is, without any exaggeration, batsh*t ****ing crazy..
Why didn't you post the entire quote?
Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC
-
bklynstoops
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,699
- And1: 1,675
- Joined: Jul 04, 2008
Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC
paul wrote:bklynstoops wrote:paul wrote:
Who?
does it matter? isn't your whole point to lump an entire fanbase together under your silly sig?
trolls.
What? The point of my sig is that it's funny, a guy calling someone else (Please Use More Appropriate Word) and spelling the word incorrectly is funny. I didn't misquote anyone or lump anyone together, nor was I trolling.
right. that's why when it was first added it, it was just his username, then you went and edited it to include "Knicks fan," right? Right ...
trolls.
Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC
- paul
- RealGM
- Posts: 32,398
- And1: 1,038
- Joined: Dec 11, 2007
-
Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC
Striders wrote:clownparade wrote:Striders wrote:And you yourself insinuated that all Knick fans are homers in the other thread.
no way! people from ny being homers? thats a horrible and unrealistic thing to say! but bashing peoples intelligence and city is fair game
Already pointed out, good sir.Striders wrote:Guess not, but it's still getting personal. People insulting entire fanbases, y'know?
Paul, we know you came here to troll, dude.
Yeah, I didn't. I've been following the entire thread without posting in it, just found that quote in my sig funny. You didn't?
Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC
- Striders
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,281
- And1: 252
- Joined: Nov 30, 2009
Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC
paul wrote:Why didn't you post the entire quote?
It's funny, because in the thread that you referred to, you blatantly lied about the Jennings/Felton matchup. You also made a point of calling all Knicks fans homers.
Success is how high you bounce when you hit bottom. ~George Smith Patton
Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC
- ComboGuardCity
- RealGM
- Posts: 26,052
- And1: 4,940
- Joined: Jul 10, 2010
Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC
clownparade wrote:knick fans are easily the worst in any sport, this board is accurately reflective of their fanbase. the mods over there are no different
Seriously, if that's your opinion, why are you posting here.
Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC
- paul
- RealGM
- Posts: 32,398
- And1: 1,038
- Joined: Dec 11, 2007
-
Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC
Striders wrote:paul wrote:Why didn't you post the entire quote?
It's funny, because in the thread that you referred to, you blatantly lied about the Jennings/Felton matchup. You also made a point of calling all Knicks fans homers.
I didn't do either of those things and am more than happy to revisit that thread if you wish. I was just trying to let sleeping dogs lie rather than continuing an argument that was going nowhere, if I had kept posting in that thread it would be still going now and it wouldn't have gotten anywhere, though the personal insults I was getting for saying Felton is 'average' were fun, can't wait to get back to that.
Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC
- ComboGuardCity
- RealGM
- Posts: 26,052
- And1: 4,940
- Joined: Jul 10, 2010
Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC
paul wrote:Striders wrote:paul wrote:Why didn't you post the entire quote?
It's funny, because in the thread that you referred to, you blatantly lied about the Jennings/Felton matchup. You also made a point of calling all Knicks fans homers.
I didn't do either of those things and am more than happy to revisit that thread if you wish. I was just trying to let sleeping dogs lie rather than continuing an argument that was going nowhere, if I had kept posting in that thread it would be still going now and it wouldn't have gotten anywhere, though the personal insults I was getting for saying Felton is 'average' were fun, can't wait to get back to that.
If you can generalize all fans, then why can't others? I don't agree with everything said on this board, but to come in blatantly trolling is ridiculous/pathetic.
Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC
- clownparade
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,388
- And1: 163
- Joined: Jul 12, 2010
-
Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC
ComboGuardCity wrote:If you can generalize all fans, then why can't others? I don't agree with everything said on this board, but to come in blatantly trolling is ridiculous/pathetic.
heres the problem i see:
every city has crazy people in it. some of those crazy people follow sports. the larger the city the more crazy people in it, thats just pure math. there is nothing wrong with milwaukee or new york, or the large base of fans that follow either team. however, ny is quite large and because of the pure population theres going to be lots of crazy homers. same reason the raptors board has so many, and the lakers one.
anyway i guess the point is that us posters from a smaller community (our smaller city, smaller fan base and smaller realgm board) just see more crazy knick fans than any other fan base. theres some crazy bucks posters but only enough to count on 1 hand.
sometimes i grow tired of seeing the gallo for mvp type posts, just like i did with the frye is the next jesus posts, and of course the crazy curry and crawford posts before that.
theres a lot of well educated good fans that post on the knick board, but as with anything anywhere its the bad that people remember, and because of the size of your fanbase and thus message board you have lots of crazy, irrational and huge homers, far more than any of us small market teams could produce! so yes you see some crazy homers but we see far more!
Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC
- paul
- RealGM
- Posts: 32,398
- And1: 1,038
- Joined: Dec 11, 2007
-
Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC
ComboGuardCity wrote:paul wrote:Striders wrote:
It's funny, because in the thread that you referred to, you blatantly lied about the Jennings/Felton matchup. You also made a point of calling all Knicks fans homers.
I didn't do either of those things and am more than happy to revisit that thread if you wish. I was just trying to let sleeping dogs lie rather than continuing an argument that was going nowhere, if I had kept posting in that thread it would be still going now and it wouldn't have gotten anywhere, though the personal insults I was getting for saying Felton is 'average' were fun, can't wait to get back to that.
If you can generalize all fans, then why can't others? I don't agree with everything said on this board, but to come in blatantly trolling is ridiculous/pathetic.
Are you sure your actually meaning to talk to me? The things you are saying don't seem to be matching up with the things you are quoting, are you meaning someone else?
Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC
- Striders
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,281
- And1: 252
- Joined: Nov 30, 2009
Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC
paul wrote:I didn't do either of those things and am more than happy to revisit that thread if you wish. I was just trying to let sleeping dogs lie rather than continuing an argument that was going nowhere, if I had kept posting in that thread it would be still going now and it wouldn't have gotten anywhere, though the personal insults I was getting for saying Felton is 'average' were fun, can't wait to get back to that.
You actually did do both of those things. Look at thread again.
Success is how high you bounce when you hit bottom. ~George Smith Patton








