The Clay Matthews is God Thread

LUKE23 · Post #1 » by **LUKE23** » Wed Sep 15, 2010 7:30 pm

After further film review, the NFL has credited Packers OLB Clay Matthews with three Week 1 sacks.

He was initially credited with two. Three marks a career high for the 2009 first-round pick. Along with Mario Williams, Brian Urlacher, and LaRon Landry, Matthews was among the NFL's most dominant defenders during Week 1.

Per rotoworld.

emunney · Post #2 » by **emunney** » Wed Sep 15, 2010 7:32 pm

Any word on the ruling as to whether he'll be allowed to continue to have winged feet?

Ill-yasova · Post #3 » by **Ill-yasova** » Wed Sep 15, 2010 7:37 pm

Clay Matthews vs a Lion...and the Lion gets a shield. Who ya got?

chuckleslove · Post #4 » by **chuckleslove** » Wed Sep 15, 2010 7:38 pm

I knew I saw 3 when I was watching the game and couldn't figure out how the stats only said 2.

Newz · Post #5 » by **Newz** » Wed Sep 15, 2010 7:38 pm

Rumor is that the NFL is looking into Clay Matthews actually being the son of God.

They will conduct tests seeing if he is able to walk on water later this week. They may also shoot him, bury him in a tomb and see if he comes back from the dead on Sunday to cripple Trent Edwards.

rilamann · Post #6 » by **rilamann** » Wed Sep 15, 2010 7:44 pm

Better sticky this thread.

Siefer · Post #7 » by **Siefer** » Wed Sep 15, 2010 8:01 pm

Newz wrote:Rumor is that the NFL is looking into Clay Matthews actually being the son of God.

They will conduct tests seeing if he is able to walk on water later this week. They may also shoot him, bury him in a tomb and see if he comes back from the dead on Sunday to cripple Trent Edwards.

Only if he heals Edwards afterwards.

Then cripples him again.

Post #8 » by **MickeyDavis** » Wed Sep 15, 2010 8:05 pm

I pray for his hamstring every day and every night.

trwi7 · Post #9 » by **trwi7** » Wed Sep 15, 2010 8:12 pm

Clay Matthews doesn't need hamstrings. His hamstrings need him.

BigSmooth_31 · Post #10 » by **BigSmooth_31** » Wed Sep 15, 2010 8:24 pm

He can fly!!!

JHSFIVE · Post #11 » by **JHSFIVE** » Wed Sep 15, 2010 8:36 pm

He needs to carry a guitar, a sword or an axe on the sidelines. He's on some conan ****.

an_also · Post #12 » by **an_also** » Wed Sep 15, 2010 8:37 pm

Ill-yasova wrote:Clay Matthews vs a Lion...and the Lion gets a shield. Who ya got?

Clay is more of a lion than the lion itself

hijklll · Post #13 » by **hijklll** » Wed Sep 15, 2010 8:41 pm

Clay Matthews is God

God of thunder, to be exact..

Post #14 » by **ReasonablySober** » Wed Sep 15, 2010 8:43 pm

rilamann wrote:Better sticky this thread.

+1

And how is we haven't had this thread until just now?

BigSmooth_31 · Post #15 » by **BigSmooth_31** » Wed Sep 15, 2010 9:15 pm

This was interesting...

viewtopic.php?f=161&t=900541

I didnt ever see this thread, and it was interesting that pretty much everybody was happy (maybe not happy but at least accepting) about it except one...

eagle13 wrote:both 3rds? TT is crazy! Damn. Always does something dumb.

Nevermind as I read further...

eagle13 wrote:well I was flat out wrong bout TT moving up. Great job TT!

Its not that I didn't like Matthews. I liked Clay alot and even spoke up about drafting him. But I was talking bout trading down and taking Clay and/or Oher. Raji was my choice to pick after trading down.

Not into it enuf to bother but interesting to consider who we might have got with traded pickx.
Loadholt? LB for Giants Sintcom?

It all worked out. Like I've said several times and think I was the first to say - this was TT's best draft.

Newz · Post #16 » by **Newz** » Wed Sep 15, 2010 9:22 pm

BigSmooth_31 wrote:http://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=161&t=900541

Newz wrote:I love this trade. We got the NT we needed and now we got a linebacker who looks like he can really get after the QB and be a play maker... Those are two things that are essential to have in the 3-4 that we were lacking and we got them. I have always been a fan of TT, but today I have really liked his aggressive approach.

For him to give up that much for the guy must mean he really likes him... I think our defensive has a chance to be pretty solid next year.

trwi7 · Post #17 » by **trwi7** » Wed Sep 15, 2010 9:28 pm

rilamann wrote:Better sticky this thread.

This thread is already quite sticky if you catch my drift. :eyebrows:

rilamann · Post #18 » by **rilamann** » Wed Sep 15, 2010 11:51 pm

trwi7 wrote:
rilamann wrote:Better sticky this thread.

This thread is already quite sticky if you catch my drift.

Giving new meaning to ''contributing to a thread'',you are a very very sick man Twirl.

:lol:

Along similar lines I guess,could you imagine if Charles Woodson & Clay Matthews had a kid?

based on this picture Woodson might be expecting,Clay Matthews' power is so great he is able to impregnate men with a single hug.

bigkurty · Post #19 » by **bigkurty** » Thu Sep 16, 2010 6:42 am

What are the odds Clay ends up with 6 sacks after week 2 against an even worse oline? I say 50-50. Has a team ever had two different dpoy winners in two consecutive seasons? If not, get ready to witness it.

Oh and The Witness name tag I believe will soon be taken away from LBJ by the Packers so suck it Lebron.

Ayt · Post #20 » by **Ayt** » Thu Sep 16, 2010 7:03 am

Newz, my response was better.

Ayt wrote:
crkone wrote:Not a bad trade at all. We still can address other holes in the later rounds.

I love addressing holes.