The Karma Thread (NYG Fan Edition)

I am Ra · Post #81 » by **I am Ra** » Mon Sep 20, 2010 4:31 pm

nyknicks09 wrote:Is our week Giants fans. Suck on that. Time for you guys to put up or shut the hell up.

Talk you guys after week 3.

how about after the season.

atribecalledrch · Post #82 » by **atribecalledrch** » Mon Sep 20, 2010 4:32 pm

I am Ra wrote:
Shemy wrote:
I am Ra wrote:gosh these threads have gone for the worse.

maybe you shouldve not trolled last week and continue to troll the game thread in the Jets forum

where did I troll the jets forum? I guess posting there means trolling to you.

Nah u trolled yesterday too.

I am Ra · Post #83 » by **I am Ra** » Mon Sep 20, 2010 4:36 pm

rammagen wrote:If you let play do your talking you were pretty freaking quiet last night. What the Jets do or don't do should not effect you in any way. Why did you start spouting off on the fans which have crap to do with you. So stop trying to say your in first place after 2 games, so are the chiefs who are 2 and 0. Take your meds and your deserved taunting which you started and just remember last time stop looking for trouble.

Im defending my team. Thats all. And if i cant say were going 15-1 and cant say were going to the superbowl, id rather use facts and what has already happened.

knicks9784 · Post #84 » by **knicks9784** » Mon Sep 20, 2010 4:38 pm

I am Ra wrote:
Fat Kat wrote:
I am Ra wrote:
Jets do have a good defense. I agree. They can be good, but will it happen? remains to be seen.

same with the giants. play calling and scheme really needs to improve with us though.

Remains to be seen? We had a league leading defense last year and our loss was 10-9. Giants defense doesn't compare. Want proof? Watch last night's replay. Giants need to go lick their wounds after that beating they took.

against peyton manning. face peyton then we can compare.

tom brady doesnt count??

I am Ra · Post #85 » by **I am Ra** » Mon Sep 20, 2010 4:38 pm

atribecalledrch wrote:where did I troll the jets forum? I guess posting there means trolling to you.

Nah u trolled yesterday too.[/quote]

show me where. lol

I am Ra · Post #86 » by **I am Ra** » Mon Sep 20, 2010 4:42 pm

knicks9784 wrote:tom brady doesnt count??

nah, peyton is at another level compared to brady atm.

atribecalledrch · Post #87 » by **atribecalledrch** » Mon Sep 20, 2010 4:42 pm

I am Ra wrote:
atribecalledrch wrote:where did I troll the jets forum? I guess posting there means trolling to you.

Nah u trolled yesterday too.

show me where. lol[/quote]
U asked for it.

by I am Ra on Sun Sep 19, 2010 5:31 pm

Yeah. Revis is "hurt" now. LOL. Of course it comes after he gets owned.

Dude...don't.

- Rich Rane

by I am Ra on Sun Sep 19, 2010 7:47 pm

GnarlesOakley wrote:
There seems to be less Giants fans on this forum than there was last week.

hi.

pats secondary sucked today and brady threw horrible throws. best of luck on 15-1. LOL.

Shorty Doo-Wop · Post #88 » by **Shorty Doo-Wop** » Mon Sep 20, 2010 4:44 pm

Got em

knicks9784 · Post #89 » by **knicks9784** » Mon Sep 20, 2010 4:45 pm

I am Ra wrote:
knicks9784 wrote:tom brady doesnt count??

nah, peyton is at another level compared to brady atm.

lol i wonder if you were saying that a week ago

I am Ra · Post #90 » by **I am Ra** » Mon Sep 20, 2010 4:45 pm

atribecalledrch wrote:U asked for it.
by I am Ra on Sun Sep 19, 2010 5:31 pm

Yeah. Revis is "hurt" now. LOL. Of course it comes after he gets owned.

Dude...don't.

- Rich Rane

by I am Ra on Sun Sep 19, 2010 7:47 pm

GnarlesOakley wrote:
There seems to be less Giants fans on this forum than there was last week.

hi.

pats secondary sucked today and brady threw horrible throws. best of luck on 15-1. LOL.

Like everything else, I was making an observation and on why I said that, you can read on to where I used an example based on life. I made other comments also. just observing, not hating on no reason.

the second part, I was called out.

I am Ra · Post #91 » by **I am Ra** » Mon Sep 20, 2010 4:46 pm

knicks9784 wrote:
I am Ra wrote:
knicks9784 wrote:tom brady doesnt count??

nah, peyton is at another level compared to brady atm.

lol i wonder if you were saying that a week ago

of course i was. i always thought peyton is clearly the best QB in the league.

atribecalledrch · Post #92 » by **atribecalledrch** » Mon Sep 20, 2010 4:51 pm

^^^ Well u obviously look suspect for posting ur first post as soon as Revis got burned.

aveboogie7 · Post #93 » by **aveboogie7** » Mon Sep 20, 2010 4:52 pm

I am Ra wrote:of course i was. i always thought peyton is clearly the best QB in the league.

Drew Brees would beg to differ.

knicks9784 · Post #94 » by **knicks9784** » Mon Sep 20, 2010 4:52 pm

I am Ra wrote:
I am Ra wrote:
knicks9784 wrote:tom brady doesnt count??

nah, peyton is at another level compared to brady atm.

lol i wonder if you were saying that a week ago

of course i was. i always thought peyton is clearly the best QB in the league.[/quote]

on another level though? lol

YEAR TEAM G CMP ATT PCT YDS AVG TD LNG INT FUM RAT

peyton: 2009 IND 16 393 571 68.8 4500 7.9 33 80 16 1 99.9

brady: 2009 NE 16 371 565 65.7 4398 7.8 28 81 13 4 96.2

my point is we faced a qb on peyton's level and beat him convincingly

I am Ra · Post #95 » by **I am Ra** » Mon Sep 20, 2010 4:59 pm

atribecalledrch wrote:^^^ Well u obviously look suspect for posting ur first post as soon as Revis got burned.

well i was there the whole time and was there even after you werent. but I guess I was just trolling. smh. drive your agenda.

I am Ra · Post #96 » by **I am Ra** » Mon Sep 20, 2010 5:00 pm

aveboogie7 wrote:
I am Ra wrote:of course i was. i always thought peyton is clearly the best QB in the league.

Drew Brees would beg to differ.

drew brees has an oline, when peyton does not.

atribecalledrch · Post #97 » by **atribecalledrch** » Mon Sep 20, 2010 5:03 pm

Thats foolishness. Peyton and Brady are the top 2 in the league. Their both very dominating and can get downfield quicker than any other QBs in the league. Did you see how fast Brady got into the red zone in the first quarter? Against a top 3 D?

I am Ra · Post #98 » by **I am Ra** » Mon Sep 20, 2010 5:04 pm

knicks9784 wrote:on another level though? lol

YEAR TEAM G CMP ATT PCT YDS AVG TD LNG INT FUM RAT

peyton: 2009 IND 16 393 571 68.8 4500 7.9 33 80 16 1 99.9

brady: 2009 NE 16 371 565 65.7 4398 7.8 28 81 13 4 96.2

my point is we faced a qb on peyton's level and beat him convincingly

qb is a tough to measure because you have to value what they mean to their team. Peyton is the team over there. Any rushing they get because of Peyton. Any pass game, any protection etc. Brady is much more of a system QB. Look at Matt Cassell and what he did with the Patriots. Remind yourself how much Cassell sucks. So i understand why you dont understand if youre a stat guy, but if you watch football youd see that its Peyton in a level by himself, then everyone else.

knicks9784 · Post #99 » by **knicks9784** » Mon Sep 20, 2010 5:07 pm

I am Ra wrote:
knicks9784 wrote:on another level though? lol

YEAR TEAM G CMP ATT PCT YDS AVG TD LNG INT FUM RAT

peyton: 2009 IND 16 393 571 68.8 4500 7.9 33 80 16 1 99.9

brady: 2009 NE 16 371 565 65.7 4398 7.8 28 81 13 4 96.2

my point is we faced a qb on peyton's level and beat him convincingly

qb is a tough to measure because you have to value what they mean to their team. Peyton is the team over there. Any rushing they get because of Peyton. Any pass game, any protection etc. Brady is much more of a system QB. Look at Matt Cassell and what he did with the Patriots. Remind yourself how much Cassell sucks. So i understand why you dont understand if youre a stat guy, but if you watch football youd see that its Peyton in a level by himself, then everyone else.

i see your point, but you made it like the jets hadnt faced a top offense / qb when in fact they have. and they beat him/them. the giants didnt when they faced one. dif teams and qbs yes, but not by much.

atribecalledrch · Post #100 » by **atribecalledrch** » Mon Sep 20, 2010 5:07 pm

I am Ra wrote:
atribecalledrch wrote:^^^ Well u obviously look suspect for posting ur first post as soon as Revis got burned.

well i was there the whole time and was there even after you werent. but I guess I was just trolling. smh. drive your agenda.

U never posted anything though. U keep saying u were there. Where? It was only me and Rich Rane posting u mustve been lurking then and decided ur first post should be when Revis got burned.