WWE: Hell In A Cell (Tonight. Make picks now!)

CapeCrusader · Post #1 » by **CapeCrusader** » Tue Sep 21, 2010 6:11 am

(c)Randy Orton vs. Sheamus

(c)Kane vs. The Undertaker

John Cena vs. Wade Barrett

(c)Daniel Bryan vs. John Morrison vs. The Miz

(c)Laycool vs. Natalya

Shemy · Post #2 » by **Shemy** » Tue Sep 21, 2010 5:24 pm

no way in hell cena loses

Cliff Levingston · Post #3 » by **Cliff Levingston** » Wed Sep 22, 2010 3:52 pm

Cena should lose, but he won't. What a sad way to end the Nexus angle, which was the best thing to happen to Raw in years.

Vandal Savage · Post #4 » by **Vandal Savage** » Mon Sep 27, 2010 1:01 am

Cliff Levingston wrote:Cena should lose, but he won't. What a sad way to end the Nexus angle, which was the best thing to happen to Raw in years.

This may be true, but Wade Barret is the only one important and he'll be fine.

skbucks1985 · Post #5 » by **skbucks1985** » Mon Sep 27, 2010 1:35 am

Ted Dibiase wrote:
Cliff Levingston wrote:Cena should lose, but he won't. What a sad way to end the Nexus angle, which was the best thing to happen to Raw in years.

This may be true, but Wade Barret is the only one important and he'll be fine.

He's certainly the most polished and the most ready to be a top of card performer. But I think Skip Sheffield and Justin Gabriel both have bright futures. And although it'll probably take him a bit longer I think Michael Tarver could be a solid mid-card guy

Jackson 5ive · Post #6 » by **Jackson 5ive** » Mon Sep 27, 2010 4:59 am

CapeCrusader · Post #7 » by **CapeCrusader** » Mon Sep 27, 2010 5:18 am

Thanx for the spoiler man...I know Raw was double taped. But some people on the board would rather watch it instead of read the spoilers. Thats why we have a spoiler thread.

CapeCrusader · Post #8 » by **CapeCrusader** » Mon Sep 27, 2010 5:20 am

safi wrote:He's certainly the most polished and the most ready to be a top of card performer. But I think Skip Sheffield and Justin Gabriel both have bright futures. And although it'll probably take him a bit longer I think Michael Tarver could be a solid mid-card guy

I haven't given up on Otunga. But besides Barrett and Gabriel. Sheffield looks like the next in line from Nexus to step up and be a star. He was very key on all the attacks they had so far in their run.

Jackson 5ive · Post #9 » by **Jackson 5ive** » Mon Sep 27, 2010 5:34 am

Sorry about that CapeCrusader, I edited my OP, (If you edit my OP out of yours maybe not many saw it) I thought it was announced last week, quite frankly I forgot Raw was taped already for this week, my mistake.

skbucks1985 · Post #10 » by **skbucks1985** » Mon Sep 27, 2010 6:03 am

CapeCrusader wrote:
safi wrote:He's certainly the most polished and the most ready to be a top of card performer. But I think Skip Sheffield and Justin Gabriel both have bright futures. And although it'll probably take him a bit longer I think Michael Tarver could be a solid mid-card guy

I haven't given up on Otunga. But besides Barrett and Gabriel. Sheffield looks like the next in line from Nexus to step up and be a star. He was very key on all the attacks they had so far in their run.

Perhaps, but right now his niche is solely as a tag wrestler with a guy who can carry him in the ring and he can carry on the mic. Other than Khali, he's probably the worst worker in the company and if he wants to be a successful singles wrestler on any level he's got literally years ahead of him.

CapeCrusader · Post #11 » by **CapeCrusader** » Mon Sep 27, 2010 6:46 am

Sheffield isn't too far off. But Otunga will get it eventually I think.

Jackson 5ive · Post #12 » by **Jackson 5ive** » Mon Sep 27, 2010 7:45 pm

Sheffield can play a Batista role imo.

CapeCrusader · Post #13 » by **CapeCrusader** » Tue Sep 28, 2010 4:06 am

The triple threat match added should be good. But the stipulation is stupid.

Jackson 5ive · Post #14 » by **Jackson 5ive** » Tue Sep 28, 2010 8:18 pm

CapeCrusader wrote:The triple threat match added should be good. But the stipulation is stupid.

Agreed, Morrison heel turn?

skbucks1985 · Post #15 » by **skbucks1985** » Tue Sep 28, 2010 9:42 pm

Jackson 5ive wrote:
CapeCrusader wrote:The triple threat match added should be good. But the stipulation is stupid.

Agreed, Morrison heel turn?

I don't think so. I think this is more of a way to protect Miz so he doesn't tap in 2 straight PPV's. Plus, Raw is already too heel heavy at the top its why Edge hasn't gotten a good storyline since he got the show and why I don't think anyone would be surprised to see him show up on Friday.

SpReEfOrAlL · Post #16 » by **SpReEfOrAlL** » Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:41 am

I missed Raw, whats the deal with the triple threat? can anyone fill me in?

Post #17 » by **Stanford** » Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:44 am

SpReEfOrAlL wrote:I missed Raw, whats the deal with the triple threat? can anyone fill me in?

Submissions count anywhere.

Which is beyond stupid.

SpReEfOrAlL · Post #18 » by **SpReEfOrAlL** » Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:55 am

Stanford wrote:
SpReEfOrAlL wrote:I missed Raw, whats the deal with the triple threat? can anyone fill me in?

Submissions count anywhere.

Which is beyond stupid.

Lol. That makes no sense. But seeing Morrison and Bryan together will be sick. Morrison deserves the push that the Miz is getting.

Jackson 5ive · Post #19 » by **Jackson 5ive** » Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:32 am

Does anyone think the "Higher Power" may be Triple H and he comes back to help Wade Barrett beat Cena?

CapeCrusader · Post #20 » by **CapeCrusader** » Thu Sep 30, 2010 4:18 am

Jackson 5ive wrote:Does anyone think the "Higher Power" may be Triple H and he comes back to help Wade Barrett beat Cena?

What "Higher Power" are you taking about?