Week 3 Non Packer Games
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation
Re: Week 3 Non Packer Games
- LUKE23
- RealGM
- Posts: 72,763
- And1: 6,963
- Joined: May 26, 2005
- Location: Stunville
-
Re: Week 3 Non Packer Games
Yeah, it probably didn't cost the Lions the game yesterday, but Hochuli might as well got down on his knees and unzipped Favre's pants yesterday. Two turnovers taken back by penalties, and another one that should have been a fumble and lost yardage was called an incomplete pass. Horrible officiating in that game.
Re: Week 3 Non Packer Games
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 42,327
- And1: 2,551
- Joined: Dec 05, 2005
Re: Week 3 Non Packer Games
LUKE23 wrote:Yeah, it probably didn't cost the Lions the game yesterday, but Hochuli might as well got down on his knees and unzipped Favre's pants yesterday. Two turnovers taken back by penalties, and another one that should have been a fumble and lost yardage was called an incomplete pass. Horrible officiating in that game.
Yep.
They should be 1-2 with an outside chance at 2-1 right now. I think that franchise is heading in the right direction.
They have arguably the most talented WR in football, a good young QB and a young RB who looks like he could be solid. Suh is everything that was advertised and more, he is an absolute monster.
If they have a few more good drafts/free agent signings, they could become competitive. They really need work on their offensive line and at LB/CB. Delmas is nice in the secondary, but besides him they don't have much.
Re: Week 3 Non Packer Games
- LUKE23
- RealGM
- Posts: 72,763
- And1: 6,963
- Joined: May 26, 2005
- Location: Stunville
-
Re: Week 3 Non Packer Games
Yeah, they need OL and secondary help, but overall they have a pretty nice core. Stafford/Best/Johnson is a pretty good offensive trio. The Pettigrew pick over taking an OL is not looking too good so far.
Re: Week 3 Non Packer Games
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 42,327
- And1: 2,551
- Joined: Dec 05, 2005
Re: Week 3 Non Packer Games
LUKE23 wrote:The Pettigrew pick over taking an OL is not looking too good so far.
It's one of the worst picks in recent history, IMO. It's not really anything against Pettigrew, but I said it right when they drafted him...
If you take a QB at number one and there are elite/close to elite LT prospects available like there were at that pick... Then you take the LT and protect the huge investment that you just made at QB.
Just not a smart way to manage their assets/picks, IMO.