POLL: RB Situation - What Would You Do?

RiotPunch · Post #121 » by **RiotPunch** » Fri Sep 24, 2010 9:30 am

Yeah at least those doubting NANCE's ability can get his name right. Dimitri Nance could be OK, but he has not even come close to what Lynch has proven as a back. I am OK with giving NANCE a shot if management thinks he is capable... but if not, Lynch would flourish within our offense.

Balls2TheWalls · Post #122 » by **Balls2TheWalls** » Tue Sep 28, 2010 3:08 am

GET... ME... A RUNNING BACK... NOW.

jakecronus8 · Post #123 » by **jakecronus8** » Tue Sep 28, 2010 4:07 am

Can they add a "Punch Ted Thompson in the face" option to the poll please.

Ayt · Post #124 » by **Ayt** » Tue Sep 28, 2010 4:55 am

Moar Kuhn

dedned · Post #125 » by **dedned** » Tue Sep 28, 2010 5:13 am

Ayt wrote:Moar Kuhn

that one run was bad ass.

Mags FTW · Post #126 » by **Mags FTW** » Tue Sep 28, 2010 5:16 am

GET LYNCH NOW

raysbookclub · Post #127 » by **raysbookclub** » Tue Sep 28, 2010 5:20 am

RB wasn't our problem tonight. Our running game is not that great until later in the season every year, anyway. That said, Lynch is a good option, good fit for us, and knowing TT puts a lot of value in his college scouting reports and that he wanted him in the draft, I'd imagine he'd be happy to have him. I wouldn't question giving a 4th.

Aaron It Out · Post #128 » by **Aaron It Out** » Tue Sep 28, 2010 2:09 pm

I'd give a 1st for Larry Johnson right about now..

Post #129 » by **ReasonablySober** » Tue Sep 28, 2010 2:26 pm

Bills to start listening to trade offers for Lynch.

chuckleslove · Post #130 » by **chuckleslove** » Tue Sep 28, 2010 2:27 pm

You son of a bitch

Post #131 » by **ReasonablySober** » Tue Sep 28, 2010 2:45 pm

BOOM.

Post #132 » by **MickeyDavis** » Tue Sep 28, 2010 2:50 pm

I think Buffalo will take their time and not move him until the deadline. They can hope another top team has their RB go down and the price will go up.

Mags FTW · Post #133 » by **Mags FTW** » Tue Sep 28, 2010 2:59 pm

If TT were to overpay now to avoid that scenario, I wouldn't care. We all had a little sticker shock after the Matthews trade and there isn't a single person who would undo it. This is a time to gamble.

Kerb Hohl · Post #134 » by **Kerb Hohl** » Tue Sep 28, 2010 3:04 pm

jakecronus8 wrote:Can they add a "Punch Ted Thompson in the face" option to the poll please.

Can they add the please go to the Vikings board on your posts?

chuckleslove · Post #135 » by **chuckleslove** » Tue Sep 28, 2010 3:06 pm

GrendonJennings wrote:
jakecronus8 wrote:Can they add a "Punch Ted Thompson in the face" option to the poll please.

Can they add the please go to the Vikings board on your posts?

Oh come on, 36 out of our 53 man roster was drafted by the Packers which puts us in a tie for most in the NFL with the Panthers, I'm not sure if that stat included undrafted free agents which we have several of so that would increase the number.

We are Super Bowl contenders with that roster so clearly TT is a pile of crap as a GM.

Post #136 » by **Wade-A-Holic** » Tue Sep 28, 2010 3:07 pm

Here's a question: Would you guys trade Matt Flynn for Lynch?

DigitalFool · Post #137 » by **DigitalFool** » Tue Sep 28, 2010 3:08 pm

Mags FTW wrote:If TT were to overpay now to avoid that scenario, I wouldn't care. We all had a little sticker shock after the Matthews trade and there isn't a single person who would undo it. This is a time to gamble.

I may be in the minority, but I don't see why there would be any issue of giving up a 2nd rounder for the likes of Lynch (not saying that it would get it done). Every year TT brings in great draft talent and each year we have to decide on what 'experiment' we need to let go because we have no room. It's a nice luxury, but it's finally time to make a move when the team is hitting that window of greatness.

DigitalFool · Post #138 » by **DigitalFool** » Tue Sep 28, 2010 3:09 pm

Wade-A-Holic wrote:Here's a question: Would you guys trade Matt Flynn for Lynch?

I would if I knew we could get Edwards off waivers (unlikely).

chuckleslove · Post #139 » by **chuckleslove** » Tue Sep 28, 2010 3:10 pm

Wade-A-Holic wrote:Here's a question: Would you guys trade Matt Flynn for Lynch?

I feel like that is overpaying, but on the other hand assuming health we shouldn't need Flynn at all and if Rodgers goes down for any extended period of time our team is toast anyways, especially considering our lack of running game I don't think Flynn can come in and win us games in our current state. That is a very very interested proposal especially considering Buffalo's QB mess.

Mags FTW · Post #140 » by **Mags FTW** » Tue Sep 28, 2010 3:14 pm

Wade-A-Holic wrote:Here's a question: Would you guys trade Matt Flynn for Lynch?

Yes.

What Would You Do About Our RB Situation?