Image ImageImage Image

Bulls Rebounding

Moderators: HomoSapien, RedBulls23, Payt10, Ice Man, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, DASMACKDOWN, fleet, GimmeDat, Michael Jackson

logical_art
RealGM
Posts: 11,095
And1: 3,672
Joined: May 14, 2001

Re: Bulls Rebounding 

Post#21 » by logical_art » Sun Oct 3, 2010 3:51 am

We will be good. One thing the numbers don't show is that finally we have a rock down low to prevent big teams from pushing us around and getting offensive rebounds (see the Celtics series two years ago after which everyone wanted Blair).
User avatar
Trm3
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,379
And1: 772
Joined: Jul 15, 2010
Location: The Desert..
       

Re: Bulls Rebounding 

Post#22 » by Trm3 » Sun Oct 3, 2010 3:58 am

This is an easy answer..we're going to dominate the boards.
jcuuofd
Analyst
Posts: 3,123
And1: 511
Joined: Dec 12, 2004

Re: Bulls Rebounding 

Post#23 » by jcuuofd » Sun Oct 3, 2010 4:08 am

Scorpion King wrote:Bulls should be top 5 in rebounding next year

Noah - Excellent rebounder
Boozer - Excellent rebounder
Deng - good rebounder
Rose - ok rebounder
SG - Brewer/Korver/Bogans - ok at rebounding.


Don't forget about the bench. The Bulls will have players that are good at rebounding on the floor at all times. Taj and KT are already good at rebounding and Asik should be as well. I wouldn't be at all surprised if the Bulls were #1 in rebounding next year.
User avatar
Wont PerDont
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,712
And1: 355
Joined: Jun 06, 2010
Location: Atlanta, GA
       

Re: Bulls Rebounding 

Post#24 » by Wont PerDont » Sun Oct 3, 2010 5:16 am

jcuuofd wrote:
Scorpion King wrote:Bulls should be top 5 in rebounding next year

Noah - Excellent rebounder
Boozer - Excellent rebounder
Deng - good rebounder
Rose - ok rebounder
SG - Brewer/Korver/Bogans - ok at rebounding.


Don't forget about the bench. The Bulls will have players that are good at rebounding on the floor at all times. Taj and KT are already good at rebounding and Asik should be as well. I wouldn't be at all surprised if the Bulls were #1 in rebounding next year.


I would be surprised if they weren't.
Freaky like my lady pyramid...

-Formerly: gineric 12

-P.J. Carlesimo on Denver Coach Brian Shaw (2/21/14): "He's paid his dues and he's ready for a head job..."
jcuuofd
Analyst
Posts: 3,123
And1: 511
Joined: Dec 12, 2004

Re: Bulls Rebounding 

Post#25 » by jcuuofd » Sun Oct 3, 2010 5:56 am

gineric 12 wrote:
jcuuofd wrote:
Scorpion King wrote:Bulls should be top 5 in rebounding next year

Noah - Excellent rebounder
Boozer - Excellent rebounder
Deng - good rebounder
Rose - ok rebounder
SG - Brewer/Korver/Bogans - ok at rebounding.


Don't forget about the bench. The Bulls will have players that are good at rebounding on the floor at all times. Taj and KT are already good at rebounding and Asik should be as well. I wouldn't be at all surprised if the Bulls were #1 in rebounding next year.


I would be surprised if they weren't.


I wasn't gonna go that far, but it looks like you are right. According to yahoo sports the Bulls had the highest rebounding average in the NBA with 44.6 per game, right ahead of the Lakers who had 44.3. The year before they were 10th in the league. Last season was really a break out year for Noah in rebounding. With the addition of Boozer and good players on the bench that can rebound the Bulls should be able to average at least 45 rebounds per game.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/stats/bytea ... 9&sort=233
Gant
RealGM
Posts: 11,065
And1: 15,674
Joined: Mar 16, 2006

Re: Bulls Rebounding 

Post#26 » by Gant » Sun Oct 3, 2010 1:26 pm

Rebounding average doesn't mean much. Some teams play a style that generates more rebounding opportunities for both teams. As was already mentioned, it's rebounding differential that matters.

Chicago was 9th in the league in rebounding differential last year at plus 1.9. This year they should be better than that, maybe much better.

Cleveland was the best last season at +4.0. They've obviously fallen apart. Memphis was second at +3.8. Third through eighth were all good teams. Orlando was fourth. Boston was very weak at a -1.5, which led them to fire Clifford Ray and hire as many O'Neals as they could find. The Lakers were eighth, just ahead of the Bulls.

Four weak teams were very bad, led by Golden State at an almost unbelievable -9.7! That should be remedied somewhat by a new coach and David Lee.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/stats/bytea ... 9&sort=233
transplant
RealGM
Posts: 11,734
And1: 3,419
Joined: Aug 16, 2001
Location: state of perpetual confusion
       

Re: Bulls Rebounding 

Post#27 » by transplant » Sun Oct 3, 2010 2:20 pm

BrooklynBulls wrote:Well, my amateur projections show us to be the greatest rebounding team of all time, and possibly a top 5 NFL team as well.

:lol: Nice.
Until the actual truth is more important to you than what you believe, you will never recognize the truth.

- Blatantly stolen from truebluefan
User avatar
DJhitek
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,778
And1: 1,354
Joined: Jul 12, 2004
Location: Berto Center
       

Re: Bulls Rebounding 

Post#28 » by DJhitek » Sun Oct 3, 2010 4:42 pm

Actually, Derrick Rose isn't a very good rebounder at all considering his physical talents. If he picks it up than the Bulls will be the best rebounding team by a good margin.
jcuuofd
Analyst
Posts: 3,123
And1: 511
Joined: Dec 12, 2004

Re: Bulls Rebounding 

Post#29 » by jcuuofd » Sun Oct 3, 2010 5:26 pm

Gant wrote:Rebounding average doesn't mean much. Some teams play a style that generates more rebounding opportunities for both teams. As was already mentioned, it's rebounding differential that matters.

Chicago was 9th in the league in rebounding differential last year at plus 1.9. This year they should be better than that, maybe much better.

Cleveland was the best last season at +4.0. They've obviously fallen apart. Memphis was second at +3.8. Third through eighth were all good teams. Orlando was fourth. Boston was very weak at a -1.5, which led them to fire Clifford Ray and hire as many O'Neals as they could find. The Lakers were eighth, just ahead of the Bulls.

Four weak teams were very bad, led by Golden State at an almost unbelievable -9.7! That should be remedied somewhat by a new coach and David Lee.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/stats/bytea ... 9&sort=233


I don't fully understand how rebounding differential is the best measure of a teams rebounding ability. Teams with higher scoring efficiency generate less rebounds for the opposing teams. On average for every 3 defensive rebounds a team gets they will also get 1 offensive rebound. If a team like the Cavs or the Thunder are shooting at a higher percentage there will be less defensive rebounds for the opposing team to get - and on average about 75% of a teams rebounds are on defense.

Using rebounding differential puts the Cavs, Grizzlies, Jazz, Thunder, and Blazers all ahead of the Bulls. I don't consider any of these teams to be better at rebounding than the Bulls, I would attribute the higher rebounding differential for these teams to a higher scoring efficiency and not better rebounding skills.

Return to Chicago Bulls