St.Nick wrote:It's not a red herring. Beasley is making $5M this year and Ridnour $4M. Jefferson was due to make $13M. Would you rather have Jefferson and his 18-20ppg and 8-10rpg or take a risk on Beasley and settle for Ridnour?
For that $4M extra, what is better on your roster-- the backup PG and the headcase or the guy with elite post skills?
I know what you are going to say, so you don't have to bother responding with the justification. But we'll see what happens this year.
I'll go ahead and respond, thanks. First off, Jefferson is being replaced on the roster with more minutes from Love and Pekovic. Now, in anlyzing the Jefferson trade we are $9M under the cap. Last year we were above the cap. Why are you arbitrarily picking Beasley and Ridnour as Jefferson replacements and saying we are "rebuilding" around those two players. Why not pick Pekovic? Why not pick Tolliver? Why not two future first round picks? OR how about we wait and see what we do with the $9M?
You see you're ignoring the thought process behind trading Jefferson and arbitrarily comparing him to two new players on the roster. Our two best players were PFs. One made $14M and didn't make the players around him better. Are we any better off right now having Jefferson on the roster as an undersized center and winning 25 games or a younger Beasley on the roster and winning 20? Now consider we're saving an additional $9M under the cap and consider the opportunities that is likely to present to us in the future. I'll take Beasley + $9M + 2 future firsts over Jefferson and no cap any day.