This was a winnable game lost because the team, from coaches to players, doesn't know how to win and doesn't handle end-of-game situations well. You have to try that long FG and show some faith in the defense if Hanson misses. The red zone plays were too predictable too.
I thought Hill looked very good but some of that is a function of how terrible GB's secondary and LBs are. I would have rode Pettigrew more, they had absolutely no concept of how to defend a TE more than 5 yards down the field.
OL looked better overall but the penalties were costly. This line is built to play better against 3-4 fronts and did so.
Chris Houston impressed again. He belongs as a starter. Smith is still very hit/miss but he is aggressive after the ball anyways. IMO Delmas had a poor game and his undisciplined style is wearing thinner all the time.
Lions @ Packers - Game 4
Moderator: theBigLip
Re: Lions @ Packers - Game 4
-
- NFL Analyst
- Posts: 16,964
- And1: 129
- Joined: Apr 30, 2001
- Location: Back in the 616
- Contact:
-
Re: Lions @ Packers - Game 4
It's not whether you win or lose, it's how good you look playing the game