ImageImageImageImageImage

First Preseason Game:TV

Moderators: KF10, codydaze

User avatar
KiNgSbOi
Junior
Posts: 369
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 04, 2010
Location: Phoenix

Re: First Preseason Game:TV 

Post#61 » by KiNgSbOi » Wed Oct 6, 2010 5:18 am

or just look at the Colts.
User avatar
RIPskaterdude
RealGM
Posts: 92,817
And1: 37,039
Joined: Jul 10, 2003
Location: #MakeAmericaGreatAgain
   

Re: First Preseason Game:TV 

Post#62 » by RIPskaterdude » Wed Oct 6, 2010 5:21 am

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fHYYkZpZGjo[/youtube]
Image
User avatar
YC42Balla
Rookie
Posts: 1,054
And1: 62
Joined: May 30, 2010
Location: NorCal

Re: First Preseason Game:TV 

Post#63 » by YC42Balla » Wed Oct 6, 2010 5:29 am

xx_skaterdude_xx wrote:Cousins: 16 pts/16 rebounds in 28 mins
Evans: 26 pts/5 assists (only 1 TO) in 27 minutes

:wizard:

Wow, great performance by Cousins. that's truly amazing!! I don't care if this is pre season, summer league, D-league, regular season, post season.. that's impressive. (J.Wall also had a good rooking debut.. 21pts 9ast)

KF10 wrote:Don't forget about Thompson:

17 points
10 rebounds
4 assists
3 blocks
1 steal

8-13 FG

Nicceeeeeeeeeeeeee.

Thompson also had a great game... and I like that Evans Is hitting his 3's/mids and knocked down 26pts.. great overall performance from the whole team. I'm liking this team's improvement from last season.
SacKingsPejaFan wrote:Yes it's just one game, but a starting lineup of

PG-Evans
SG-Udrih
SF-Casspi
PF-Thompson
C-Cousins

will take the league by storm. This is going to be one hell of a year. Thank you Philadelphia, Minnesota, and New Jersey for passing on Mr. Cousins. With Landry and Dalembert off the bench for offense/defense, we're not being messed with down low.


I'm lovin' that line up!! Our team looks pretty good.. I can't wait to see how we preform during the regular season.

By the way... did any one here get NBA 2k11 yet?
what's up with udrih being rated a 66? when last season he was a 68.. and he came off a great season.

and also DeMarcus Cousins is rated a 70 while John Wall is a 81, Turner, Griffin are rated 76 while wes Johnson and Favors are both 73.

I know it's just a game, but seriously WTF?!
SAC-RA-MEN-TO #HEREWESTAYED
SacKingZZZ
RealGM
Posts: 24,085
And1: 1,084
Joined: Feb 19, 2005
Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."

Re: First Preseason Game:TV 

Post#64 » by SacKingZZZ » Wed Oct 6, 2010 6:09 am

I wouldn't sweat that stuff. I'm sure they'll release roster updates and those numbers will be adjusted accordingly.

Just saw some TV quality highlights on NBA-TV. WTF!?!? They film the game TV style and don't show it ANYWHERE!? I don't get that at all.

Anyway, JT, Cuz, and Evans all looked good. Can't wait to see Daly and Hassan get back and get some time to play.
User avatar
ADoaN17
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,044
And1: 312
Joined: Feb 11, 2010
   

Re: First Preseason Game:TV 

Post#65 » by ADoaN17 » Wed Oct 6, 2010 6:46 am

I dont like the new CSN King's scoreboard. Ugly.
Image
SacKingZZZ
RealGM
Posts: 24,085
And1: 1,084
Joined: Feb 19, 2005
Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."

Re: First Preseason Game:TV 

Post#66 » by SacKingZZZ » Wed Oct 6, 2010 6:53 am

Is that what it's really going to be? Yeah, blocks too much of the screen. If they want to go that route put it at the very top ESPN style.
User avatar
ADoaN17
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,044
And1: 312
Joined: Feb 11, 2010
   

Re: First Preseason Game:TV 

Post#67 » by ADoaN17 » Wed Oct 6, 2010 7:01 am

SacKingZZZ wrote:Is that what it's really going to be? Yeah, blocks too much of the screen. If they want to go that route put it at the very top ESPN style.

Well the Kings one looks like they are trying to resemble ESPN's NBA scoreboard. The NFL scoreboard is the one on top.
Image
User avatar
Vindicater
General Manager
Posts: 7,948
And1: 423
Joined: Apr 11, 2004

Re: First Preseason Game:TV 

Post#68 » by Vindicater » Wed Oct 6, 2010 7:10 am

Hey Guys

Timberwolves fan here who was tickled pink when the Wolves bypassed Cousins for Johnson and then felt justified by Cousins efforts in SL.

But I have to say after that game that by the end of the season I might just have to come and eat some crow.

Cousins looked great (Johnson by the way didn't look as great but did some nice things and coming back from a hamstring injury I was happy with where he was at).

Looking forward to the western conference finals in 3-4 years between the T-Wolves and the Kings!
"That's why the last two years weren't guaranteed," Walsh said. "Either way, he knew it could have happened either way."
DaDragicShow
Banned User
Posts: 4,337
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 30, 2008
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona

Re: First Preseason Game:TV 

Post#69 » by DaDragicShow » Wed Oct 6, 2010 9:16 am

Good game. :(
User avatar
pillwenney
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 48,887
And1: 2,603
Joined: Sep 19, 2004
Location: Avidly reading pstyousuck.blogspot.com/
Contact:
 

Re: First Preseason Game:TV 

Post#70 » by pillwenney » Wed Oct 6, 2010 11:30 am

SacKingZZZ wrote:
Under the right situation yes. I don't know what Westphals vision is, but I totally see that guy coming off the bench playing C, especially if he's going to get the kind of minutes he deserves. A player coming off the bench that can play multiple positions is inherently going to get those extra minutes by swapping spots. The reality is we still have way too many bodies because there's that Dalembert guy wanthing minutes too, so....


Uhh...why? We simply won't have any available minutes at center. Barring major changes, JT won't be playing many minutes at center this year just because those minutes will be almost entirely taken up by Cuz and Dalembert. And no, a player coming off the bench isn't necessarily going to be swapping positions. The other players will. Landry will be PF at all times. He'll always be playing with one of the other bigs, who will be center by default.

My main thing has been that we basically should have one of Landry/Cuz starting and one coming off the bench. It's just not that useful to have our three best scorers all jammed into one lineup. I believe a coach by the name of Popovich knows what I'm talking about.

Anyway, great start to the preseason. The boxscore was nice. The highlights got me giddy. I'll say this though. The guys saying that Tyreke has a jumper need to reeeeeaaalllly pump the breaks. We've still got months before we can declare that with confidence.
User avatar
countrybama24
Rookie
Posts: 1,182
And1: 25
Joined: Jan 05, 2010

Re: First Preseason Game:TV 

Post#71 » by countrybama24 » Wed Oct 6, 2010 1:01 pm

Yo, why didn't Hassan play? D-league?
User avatar
KingInExile
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 14,416
And1: 4
Joined: May 25, 2004
Location: RIP Wayman Tisdale...You left us way too early.

Re: First Preseason Game:TV 

Post#72 » by KingInExile » Wed Oct 6, 2010 1:36 pm

countrybama24 wrote:Yo, why didn't Hassan play? D-league?

injury
This space needs to be filled with a new sig...but I'm too lazy to make one.
SacKingZZZ
RealGM
Posts: 24,085
And1: 1,084
Joined: Feb 19, 2005
Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."

Re: First Preseason Game:TV 

Post#73 » by SacKingZZZ » Wed Oct 6, 2010 9:12 pm

mitchweber wrote:
Uhh...why? We simply won't have any available minutes at center. Barring major changes, JT won't be playing many minutes at center this year just because those minutes will be almost entirely taken up by Cuz and Dalembert. And no, a player coming off the bench isn't necessarily going to be swapping positions. The other players will. Landry will be PF at all times. He'll always be playing with one of the other bigs, who will be center by default.

My main thing has been that we basically should have one of Landry/Cuz starting and one coming off the bench. It's just not that useful to have our three best scorers all jammed into one lineup. I believe a coach by the name of Popovich knows what I'm talking about.

Anyway, great start to the preseason. The boxscore was nice. The highlights got me giddy. I'll say this though. The guys saying that Tyreke has a jumper need to reeeeeaaalllly pump the breaks. We've still got months before we can declare that with confidence.



Because that's literally the only way he can get respectable minutes. Whoever comes of the bench with the team as currently constructed is going to have to play at least 2 spots in order to get anything close to respectable minutes. JT won't play much at C!? OK, how do you see the rotation working out minutes wise??? Go ahead and show me your rotation. The truth is, if one or both of Landry/Thompson want minutes close to what they played last year they're going to probably have to play SF too, while somebody like Donte or Casspi gets crunched in the process. Historically that's pretty much how it works in a 3 big man rotation. You have your PF and C, and typically the guy coming off the bench can play either spot allowing him to play with either starter.

In a perfect world you would say, "hey, JT gets 24 mpg, Landry gets 24 mpg, Daly gets 24 mpg, and Cousins gets 24 mpg." That NEVER works in the real world. The only way it can is if the team really, really buys in AND! (very important and) you're in the running for a championship by doing so. The other fantastic part of that is you can literally watch the stock of your players drop around the league. Platooning does not work when you have a team stocked full of talented players (especially young players), just look at how much of a mess Fratello made in Memphis a few years back.
User avatar
pillwenney
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 48,887
And1: 2,603
Joined: Sep 19, 2004
Location: Avidly reading pstyousuck.blogspot.com/
Contact:
 

Re: First Preseason Game:TV 

Post#74 » by pillwenney » Wed Oct 6, 2010 10:37 pm

SacKingZZZ wrote:
mitchweber wrote:
Uhh...why? We simply won't have any available minutes at center. Barring major changes, JT won't be playing many minutes at center this year just because those minutes will be almost entirely taken up by Cuz and Dalembert. And no, a player coming off the bench isn't necessarily going to be swapping positions. The other players will. Landry will be PF at all times. He'll always be playing with one of the other bigs, who will be center by default.

My main thing has been that we basically should have one of Landry/Cuz starting and one coming off the bench. It's just not that useful to have our three best scorers all jammed into one lineup. I believe a coach by the name of Popovich knows what I'm talking about.

Anyway, great start to the preseason. The boxscore was nice. The highlights got me giddy. I'll say this though. The guys saying that Tyreke has a jumper need to reeeeeaaalllly pump the breaks. We've still got months before we can declare that with confidence.



Because that's literally the only way he can get respectable minutes. Whoever comes of the bench with the team as currently constructed is going to have to play at least 2 spots in order to get anything close to respectable minutes. JT won't play much at C!? OK, how do you see the rotation working out minutes wise??? Go ahead and show me your rotation. The truth is, if one or both of Landry/Thompson want minutes close to what they played last year they're going to probably have to play SF too, while somebody like Donte or Casspi gets crunched in the process. Historically that's pretty much how it works in a 3 big man rotation. You have your PF and C, and typically the guy coming off the bench can play either spot allowing him to play with either starter.

In a perfect world you would say, "hey, JT gets 24 mpg, Landry gets 24 mpg, Daly gets 24 mpg, and Cousins gets 24 mpg." That NEVER works in the real world. The only way it can is if the team really, really buys in AND! (very important and) you're in the running for a championship by doing so. The other fantastic part of that is you can literally watch the stock of your players drop around the league. Platooning does not work when you have a team stocked full of talented players (especially young players), just look at how much of a mess Fratello made in Memphis a few years back.


I don't disagree that there will be a minutes crunch (although I think 24 will be just around the right amount for Cousins and maybe Dalembert). I just think bringing Landry off the bench changes absolutely nothing in that regard. Like, nothing in any way at all.

And that's not necessarily how it works at all--bringing a multi-position big off the bench. It varies completely depending on your team. Somebody in a 3-man rotation has to be able to play two positions. But DMC will play both (basically more as a default when next to Dalembert) and JT can play both. Bring Landry in and whoever he is playing with is center by default. I don't see how that doesn't get through to you logically.

I have wanted a JT/Cousins starting front court from the beginning. So I would start them, and then depending on what the team needed (basically offense or defense) I'd bring in Dalembert or Landry (or possibly both). If I bring in Dalembert, JT/DMC is the PF, and if I bring in Landry, JT/DMC is the center.

Regardless, if we're going to start DMC, we are best off bringing our other strong offensive option off the bench.
SacKingZZZ
RealGM
Posts: 24,085
And1: 1,084
Joined: Feb 19, 2005
Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."

Re: First Preseason Game:TV 

Post#75 » by SacKingZZZ » Thu Oct 7, 2010 2:37 am

mitchweber wrote:


I don't disagree that there will be a minutes crunch (although I think 24 will be just around the right amount for Cousins and maybe Dalembert). I just think bringing Landry off the bench changes absolutely nothing in that regard. Like, nothing in any way at all.

And that's not necessarily how it works at all--bringing a multi-position big off the bench. It varies completely depending on your team. Somebody in a 3-man rotation has to be able to play two positions. But DMC will play both (basically more as a default when next to Dalembert) and JT can play both. Bring Landry in and whoever he is playing with is center by default. I don't see how that doesn't get through to you logically.

I have wanted a JT/Cousins starting front court from the beginning. So I would start them, and then depending on what the team needed (basically offense or defense) I'd bring in Dalembert or Landry (or possibly both). If I bring in Dalembert, JT/DMC is the PF, and if I bring in Landry, JT/DMC is the center.

Regardless, if we're going to start DMC, we are best off bringing our other strong offensive option off the bench.


That minutes crunch is the major problem here though, and why it's necessary to have a player off the bench that can play multiple positions (once again, the argument). In reality it still doesn't matter but it could ease some of the tension from game to game. If Daly and Cousins play 24 mpg a piece that means 24 remaining minutes for Landry/Thompson each, unless one or the other plays minutes at SF. Like I said, play them all 24 mpg, and watch it blow!
User avatar
YC42Balla
Rookie
Posts: 1,054
And1: 62
Joined: May 30, 2010
Location: NorCal

Re: First Preseason Game:TV 

Post#76 » by YC42Balla » Thu Oct 7, 2010 3:48 am

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=az2GWxQSAUY&feature=related[/youtube]

Looks like they played a Great game!!
SAC-RA-MEN-TO #HEREWESTAYED
KF10
Forum Mod - Kings
Forum Mod - Kings
Posts: 25,434
And1: 5,537
Joined: Jul 28, 2006
 

Re: First Preseason Game:TV 

Post#77 » by KF10 » Thu Oct 7, 2010 3:56 am

Here's another video:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iDFHJh1c6r4[/youtube]

Return to Sacramento Kings