Diaz vs. Noons 2

Moderator: lilfishi22

User avatar
singh_shady
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 17,011
And1: 4,397
Joined: Jul 12, 2004
Location: Winnipeg, Canada
 

Re: Diaz vs. Noons 2 

Post#41 » by singh_shady » Sun Oct 10, 2010 6:39 pm

Diaz needs to fight Paul Daley next
User avatar
cowboyronnie
RealGM
Posts: 30,236
And1: 1,490
Joined: Feb 20, 2004

Re: Diaz vs. Noons 2 

Post#42 » by cowboyronnie » Sun Oct 10, 2010 11:38 pm

The K-1 Final 16 is C-level striking at best. Those are weight lifters not kickboxers.
Hi love, bye love, I will miss my love.
User avatar
Cammo101
Mr. Mock Draft
Posts: 30,840
And1: 2,008
Joined: Feb 11, 2006
Location: Austin, TX
     

Re: Diaz vs. Noons 2 

Post#43 » by Cammo101 » Mon Oct 11, 2010 4:07 am

cowboyronnie wrote:The K-1 Final 16 is C-level striking at best. Those are weight lifters not kickboxers.


This.
Tony_Montana
Banned User
Posts: 5,202
And1: 1
Joined: Dec 10, 2003

Re: Diaz vs. Noons 2 

Post#44 » by Tony_Montana » Mon Oct 11, 2010 5:04 am

spykelee wrote:
singh_shady wrote:Can someone explain to me how Diaz won that fight? Noons was more accurate with his strikes and landed something like 150-200 more strikes.. You could see that BS call from a mile away though, with the crowd influence and what not.


I agree with you. I thought Noons should have won a close decision. Combinations or not, if you land 150-200 more strikes than your opponent in a 5 round stand up battle, I think you should win the fight.

But I also subscribe to the "gotta beat the champion" mambo jambo, and even if it's one of my least favourite fighters in all of mma, I can't say that Noons did that.


watch the fights. do you really think kj landed 150 more strikes? damn. compustrike accounted for their mistake anyways. diaz landed more and a better clip. noons was like 25% on strikes.
User avatar
Nemesis21
RealGM
Posts: 39,226
And1: 6,614
Joined: Feb 11, 2006
Location: Free Nemesis21
         

Re: Diaz vs. Noons 2 

Post#45 » by Nemesis21 » Mon Oct 11, 2010 6:25 am

Woodley keeps on winning . Nice armbar by Coenen . Glad to see Nick get revenge in 2nd fight with Noons. Hope to see a third one down the road .
User avatar
singh_shady
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 17,011
And1: 4,397
Joined: Jul 12, 2004
Location: Winnipeg, Canada
 

Re: Diaz vs. Noons 2 

Post#46 » by singh_shady » Mon Oct 11, 2010 6:55 am

cowboyronnie wrote:The K-1 Final 16 is C-level striking at best. Those are weight lifters not kickboxers.


I'm definitely not saying that K-1 WGP striking is the best in the world, they're heavyweights and they won't be as technical as the K-1 Max middleweights or the pure MT strikers from Thailand who are held back by the K-1 rule set. But if you think guys like Daniel Ghita or Gokhan Saki display C-level striking then Diaz/Noons was F.
User avatar
SDM
RealGM
Posts: 19,555
And1: 954
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
 

Re: Diaz vs. Noons 2 

Post#47 » by SDM » Tue Oct 12, 2010 12:58 pm

Can't stand the guy, but Diaz won that fight. I can't wait for the rubber match.
User avatar
cowboyronnie
RealGM
Posts: 30,236
And1: 1,490
Joined: Feb 20, 2004

Re: Diaz vs. Noons 2 

Post#48 » by cowboyronnie » Wed Oct 13, 2010 5:24 pm

The CompuStrike was wrong, it turns out. They somehow doubled KJ's strike count.

Source: the internet
Hi love, bye love, I will miss my love.
El Hardee
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,882
And1: 25
Joined: Oct 09, 2007
Location: L.A.

Re: Diaz vs. Noons 2 

Post#49 » by El Hardee » Wed Oct 13, 2010 7:37 pm

cowboyronnie wrote:The CompuStrike was wrong, it turns out. They somehow doubled KJ's strike count.

Source: the internet
That sounds more like it, Noons was active but Diaz at least attempted a counter in every excahnge. To me they were tit for tat.
Image

Return to Boxing & Mixed Martial Arts