Until we........

JMac1 · Post #1 » by **JMac1** » Sun Oct 24, 2010 11:45 pm

Put Grant on the bench, move Hedo to the 3, and start Frye (or another true 4) at the PF position we will not have a chance.

I am tired of this crap!! Grant loyalty means nothing to me nor should it to you. Let Frye camp out at the 3pt line alas Bruce Bowen and defend 4's not 5's!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Put Hedo at the 3 and allow him to have the ball in his hands more and sign Dampier already.

Nash/Goran
JRich/Duds
Hedo/Hill
Frye/Hakim
Lopez/Damp

I have no idea why we prefer to be small when we actually have a BIG starting lineup :evil:

Hedo has good feet put him on some 3's. He is sucking because he is out of position on defense............He is pissed!!

RaisingArizona · Post #2 » by **RaisingArizona** » Mon Oct 25, 2010 12:08 am

The ghost of Mary's past?

Jdiddy701 · Post #3 » by **Jdiddy701** » Mon Oct 25, 2010 12:37 am

First of all, the season hasn't even started.

Although, I do agree with putting Hill to the bench. But Frye stays put as well, start Warrick.
Let the real thing play out, first.

JPHX · Post #4 » by **JPHX** » Mon Oct 25, 2010 12:50 am

where does childress go?

TheMan44 · Post #5 » by **TheMan44** » Mon Oct 25, 2010 12:57 am

ugh. I think we've brought this topic up a million times already.

I even mentioned the same thing.

viewtopic.php?f=27&t=1060633

Lock this.

RocPHX · Post #6 » by **RocPHX** » Mon Oct 25, 2010 1:07 am

Why when hill plays great with the starters? He's better than Hedo so I don't see why he should be on the bench. Hedo is the one who needs to be with the second unit so he can have ball handling duties.

Calvin Klein · Post #7 » by **Calvin Klein** » Mon Oct 25, 2010 1:08 am

Hill has been pretty good last season. No reason to move him to the bench until he starts showings signs of sucking.

Nando88 · Post #8 » by **Nando88** » Mon Oct 25, 2010 1:28 am

pretty nice article right here

http://valleyofthesuns.com/2010/10/23/h ... -turkoglu/

RocPHX · Post #9 » by **RocPHX** » Mon Oct 25, 2010 1:32 am

Nando88 wrote:pretty nice article right here

http://valleyofthesuns.com/2010/10/23/h ... -turkoglu/

*claps*
Been saying this for awhile now. Hedos style will fit so good with the second unit.

Nando88 · Post #10 » by **Nando88** » Mon Oct 25, 2010 1:46 am

RocPHX wrote:
Nando88 wrote:pretty nice article right here

http://valleyofthesuns.com/2010/10/23/h ... -turkoglu/

*claps*
Been saying this for awhile now. Hedos style will fit so good with the second unit.

i've been on the 'Hill off the bench wagon' but i think hedo would be more valuable with the second unit... but we have to worry about how that would rub with hedo.... and who's the odd man out chill or duds? or would hedo be the backup PF?

RocPHX · Post #11 » by **RocPHX** » Mon Oct 25, 2010 2:04 am

Hedo would definitely be the back up PF. We can get away with it off the bench imo.

Nando88 · Post #12 » by **Nando88** » Mon Oct 25, 2010 2:14 am

RocPHX wrote:Hedo would definitely be the back up PF. We can get away with it off the bench imo.

yeah.... your right, but i'm just worried that hedo would throw a piss fit... but as long as he gets as many minutes as a starter then maybe he would warm up to it

sunsfan3 · Post #13 » by **sunsfan3** » Mon Oct 25, 2010 2:35 am

i like the idea.
i said this one time n got bashed by everyone for such a 'ridiculous' idea.

gentry said he does want to cut down nash and hill's minutes to save their career.
so that means with hill's minutes cut, we can put childress in the SG/SF position n share the backup positions with hill n duds.

Never Fear 33 Is Here · Post #14 » by **Never Fear 33 Is Here** » Mon Oct 25, 2010 3:21 am

RocPHX wrote:Why when hill plays great with the starters? He's better than Hedo so I don't see why he should be on the bench. Hedo is the one who needs to be with the second unit so he can have ball handling duties.

+100000000000000000000000000000000000

JasonDaPsycho · Post #15 » by **JasonDaPsycho** » Mon Oct 25, 2010 3:53 am

Hill will be way more effective starting then coming off the bench. Hedo makes a lot more sense for the second unit.

DRK · Post #16 » by **DRK** » Mon Oct 25, 2010 8:29 am

You do realise that with Frye starting the 4, we will have HakimWarrick playing center for our second unit?? Plus it makes no difference as Hedo will be playing the 4 for the second unit aswell.

Lopez
Frye
Hill
J-Rich
Nash

Warrick
Hedo
Childress
Dudley
Dragic

Use your brain next time before creating another useless thread.

MrVince · Post #17 » by **MrVince** » Mon Oct 25, 2010 8:46 am

Hill works better than Turkoglu in the starting line up. I'd rather trust Hill than Turkoglu.

swe_suns · Post #18 » by **swe_suns** » Mon Oct 25, 2010 9:37 am

Da_Reel_Kboy wrote:You do realise that with Frye starting the 4, we will have HakimWarrick playing center for our second unit??

Warrick
Hedo
Childress
Dudley
Dragic

Use your brain next time before creating another useless thread.

JMac1 wrote:Nash/Goran
JRich/Duds
Hedo/Hill
Frye/Hakim
Lopez/Damp

He said "sign Damp" so instead of being a douche perhaps you should try to read before you post next time.

DRK · Post #19 » by **DRK** » Mon Oct 25, 2010 9:47 am

Dampier isn't even on the team yet. I doubt he will come here either.

I dont know if OP still wants to run with that lineup even if we don't get Damp...

JohnVancouver · Post #20 » by **JohnVancouver** » Mon Oct 25, 2010 8:27 pm

I agree with the columnist - Hedo in the second unit, Warrick in the first as a 4.

Nash/JRich/Lopez/Hill/Warrick

Dragic/Childress/Frye/Hedo/Duds

Leaves Siler available for spot duty on either squad as needed, and same with Lawal