Image ImageImage Image

Blazers post game analysis

Moderators: HomoSapien, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23

User avatar
mattbulls
Head Coach
Posts: 6,026
And1: 127
Joined: Nov 20, 2004
       

Re: Blazers post game analysis 

Post#41 » by mattbulls » Tue Nov 2, 2010 2:46 am

What the Luol?
Image
User avatar
BeKuK
RealGM
Posts: 12,920
And1: 835
Joined: Oct 06, 2009
Location: South Germany
     

Re: Blazers post game analysis 

Post#42 » by BeKuK » Tue Nov 2, 2010 2:47 am

Really good bulls game!

Luol with a preseason luol game. So we love him.

Our motion offense worked really good...created a lot of good shots.....Our frontcourt....(noah) with good passes and plays. I just missed a little bit mor of iso-plays.

Defense was good in half two..really terrific.....Asik will be a block monster soon!

Korver with his best season game as bull.

Thibs with good rotations...let JJ play at the SG position.

Rose isn't a PG..just 13ast!

Bad are some fouls...we got really in foul trouble...we need to stop this.

BAD BAD BAD...our FTs......damn...really bad....!
User avatar
PMONSTER
Head Coach
Posts: 6,400
And1: 1,301
Joined: Nov 28, 2009
     

Re: Blazers post game analysis 

Post#43 » by PMONSTER » Tue Nov 2, 2010 2:47 am

-Illmatic- wrote:Good:
-Luol Deng

Meh:
-Joakim Noah
-Derrick Rose

Bad:
-Taj Gibson(Foul trouble)
-BScals
-Refs


If this is Meh games from Rose and Noah then put us in the Finals already
NBA Playoffs.... I can never wait!
Howling Mad
General Manager
Posts: 9,043
And1: 624
Joined: Jun 28, 2006

Re: Blazers post game analysis 

Post#44 » by Howling Mad » Tue Nov 2, 2010 2:47 am

Good:
-Luol Deng

Meh:
-Joakim Noah
-Derrick Rose

Bad:
-Taj Gibson(Foul trouble)
-BScals
-Refs


Derrick has a >20 point night and he's a MEH?!?!?
Noah has a >15 reb and >15 point night and he's a MEH!?!?!

:rofl:

nothing to complain about with either of those two. Noah played well, put up a double-double, and something that doesn't show up on the stat line-he stayed out of foul trouble when he had to.

Rose put up 13 assists with 3 TO's. Bravo!
Vicino
Sophomore
Posts: 237
And1: 36
Joined: Nov 12, 2009
Location: Scottsdale, AZ

Re: Blazers post game analysis 

Post#45 » by Vicino » Tue Nov 2, 2010 2:47 am

I really hope no one jumps back on the Deng wagon after tonight.

Impressive performance to say the least...but in the fourth quarter of a close game, he's a ghost.
saritasbora
Veteran
Posts: 2,723
And1: 92
Joined: Mar 19, 2009

Re: Blazers post game analysis 

Post#46 » by saritasbora » Tue Nov 2, 2010 2:48 am

Al Swearengen wrote:I don't want to sound like a sore winner, but man, B Roy is one whiny dude.

You can actually hear him over Thibs wampa screams, and that's saying something.


he is overrated imo. not a top 10 player at least.
User avatar
coldfish
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 60,279
And1: 37,294
Joined: Jun 11, 2004
Location: Right in the middle
   

Re: Blazers post game analysis 

Post#47 » by coldfish » Tue Nov 2, 2010 2:48 am

The good:
- Derrick for most of the game. His defense has been solid so far this year. He looked for his shot early then started finding open players. My only knock would be the turnovers. Several were unforced.
- Luol. This is the guy from preseason. Obviously his offense was near perfect but his defense was good too. Batum who? Getting back to offense, this is really a best case scenario for Luol. Great ball movement and good player movement.
- Overall offensive execution. 110 points on 91 possessions with a ton of missed free throws. A ton of assists too. I love all the offensive plays, like weaves, double curls, spot ups in the corner.
- Asik. He continues to impress me.
- Overall defensive scheme. The Bulls were running out on Roy and 3p shooters and it really took Portland out of their offensive.

Meh
- JJ. Glad to see he got a chance to follow up on his last game. Didn't do much, but he does help on defense well.
- Gibson. Good on offense but wasn't boxing out well and reaching too much on defense.

Bad
- Noah. Not that bad, but I got to put someone here, right? I wasn't happy with his boxing out or defense.

Overall, this was a very well played game by the Bulls in all phases. Portland is a good team.
User avatar
DASMACKDOWN
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 30,060
And1: 15,338
Joined: Nov 01, 2001
Location: Cookin' with Derrick Rose

Re: Blazers post game analysis 

Post#48 » by DASMACKDOWN » Tue Nov 2, 2010 2:48 am

Great win.

But seriously that game was actually painful to watch.

73 free throws? Really refs? 60 fouls?

For a game where the Bulls shoot 60% from the field, Luol goes for 40, and the game had no flow to it.

It should have been a spectacular game but it really wasnt.
User avatar
PMONSTER
Head Coach
Posts: 6,400
And1: 1,301
Joined: Nov 28, 2009
     

Re: Blazers post game analysis 

Post#49 » by PMONSTER » Tue Nov 2, 2010 2:48 am

Game Show wrote:I knew Deng would turn it around, good for him. A little consistency would be nice though


IDK...... 40 points every three games sounds good to me :lol:
NBA Playoffs.... I can never wait!
User avatar
cpta2020
Veteran
Posts: 2,721
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 29, 2009

Re: Blazers post game analysis 

Post#50 » by cpta2020 » Tue Nov 2, 2010 2:49 am

kulaz3000 wrote:Super happy that Rudy isn't a Bull. He is a 6'6 Pargo.



LOOOOOOL
Image
nitric0
RealGM
Posts: 12,594
And1: 1,415
Joined: Jan 27, 2008

Re: Blazers post game analysis 

Post#51 » by nitric0 » Tue Nov 2, 2010 2:49 am

We could have been 3-0 after this game if the refs didn't kill us against OKC. Guys, this is WITHOUT Boozer :lol:
“We were right there with them. We dominated for most of the game, but then Derrick Rose happened.” - Al Horford
User avatar
-Illmatic-
Head Coach
Posts: 6,043
And1: 97
Joined: Feb 16, 2009
Location: Philadelphia
         

Re: Blazers post game analysis 

Post#52 » by -Illmatic- » Tue Nov 2, 2010 2:49 am

Red Larrivee wrote:Uh...Rose had 15 points, 5 rebounds and 13 assists. Noah had 10 points, 10 rebounds, 4 assists and a block. How are those "meh" or 'ok' games?

Props to Lu for tonight and overall a good defensive effort from the team despite so many fouls.


Rose: 6 turnovers that almost let the Blazers back in the game. He was also passive in the second quarter when the Blazers were coming back.

Noah: Aldrige owned him on multiple occasions.
User avatar
Eyeballs
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,365
And1: 35
Joined: Oct 31, 2008
Location: Over By THERE!

Re: Blazers post game analysis 

Post#53 » by Eyeballs » Tue Nov 2, 2010 2:49 am

Hey let me talk about Asik.

First of all Stacy King please pronounce it correctly. Amir is that terrible center on the Raptors. Omer is our Turkish beast.

Secondly, Omer, please kick it out when you get a second-chance board because you are evidently going to be an unprofessional clown at the FT line. That is, unless you dunk it, because that was awesome.

Right now Omer's in the locker room all worried right now. "I have 6 yellow cards. Coach is angry"

But Thibs is gonna walk in and be like, Kid, you broke your cherry. And everyone will gather around him and give a cheer.
Image

May this be the first of many DQs, young Janissary.
League Circles
RealGM
Posts: 35,202
And1: 9,871
Joined: Dec 04, 2001
       

Re: Blazers post game analysis 

Post#54 » by League Circles » Tue Nov 2, 2010 2:49 am

Deng was great, Rose was good except for the turnovers. Johnson wasn't that good but at least provided needed energy and an athletic threat. Brewer looked a little better. I liked Omer and thought he was screwed on at least 2 of those fouls.

Noah did his thing, Bogans wasn't noticed, and Korver definitely looked better.

We led the whole way by a good margin and this was a really nice win against a good team.

I agree that Taj looks pretty bad. His offense is decent but his fouling is so predictable and necessary, and it's not because of the refs.
https://august-shop.com/ - sneakers and streetwear
User avatar
Rerisen
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 105,369
And1: 25,052
Joined: Nov 23, 2003

Re: Blazers post game analysis 

Post#55 » by Rerisen » Tue Nov 2, 2010 2:49 am

coldfish wrote: Gibson. Good on offense but wasn't boxing out well and reaching too much on defense.


We can't be fooled by his 6/9. More telling the team was neutral (+0) with him on the floor tonight, while +13 with Asik, whose positive number was in line with the other positive starters.
User avatar
PMONSTER
Head Coach
Posts: 6,400
And1: 1,301
Joined: Nov 28, 2009
     

Re: Blazers post game analysis 

Post#56 » by PMONSTER » Tue Nov 2, 2010 2:49 am

DASMACKDOWN wrote:Great win.

But seriously that game was actually painful to watch.

73 free throws? Really refs? 60 fouls?

For a game where the Bulls shoot 60% from the field, Luol goes for 40, and the game had no flow to it.

It should have been a spectacular game but it really wasnt.


73 free throws and Rose got how many?
NBA Playoffs.... I can never wait!
Evil_Headband
Veteran
Posts: 2,533
And1: 1,005
Joined: Feb 25, 2008
   

Re: Blazers post game analysis 

Post#57 » by Evil_Headband » Tue Nov 2, 2010 2:49 am

So what was up with Batum? He is suppose to be this future star but he only got 13 minutes without foul trouble.
User avatar
Red Larrivee
RealGM
Posts: 42,126
And1: 18,926
Joined: Feb 15, 2007
Location: Hogging Microphone Time From Tom Dore

Re: Blazers post game analysis 

Post#58 » by Red Larrivee » Tue Nov 2, 2010 2:49 am

Vicino wrote:I really hope no one jumps back on the Deng wagon after tonight.

Impressive performance to say the least...but in the fourth quarter of a close game, he's a ghost.


I think most (realistic) people never hopped off. Deng is going to have a good year. Players will have bad games.
User avatar
TheAdmiral
RealGM
Posts: 22,676
And1: 1,213
Joined: Nov 24, 2009
   

Re: Blazers post game analysis 

Post#59 » by TheAdmiral » Tue Nov 2, 2010 2:50 am

Rerisen wrote:Am I in the wrong place writing so much? :-?


I wanted to write a little "postgame analysis" as well, but I'm not sure if this thread is what it was supposed to be.
D-31 wrote:again..all of u Jordan fans are caught up in his scoring accolades and fail to realize that he was a lousy basketball player.

Jordan never fully understood basketball. He had the lowest basketball IQ of any NBA "superstar" in history.
User avatar
HomoSapien
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 37,193
And1: 30,153
Joined: Aug 17, 2009
 

Re: Blazers post game analysis 

Post#60 » by HomoSapien » Tue Nov 2, 2010 2:50 am

RichardsRival3 wrote:
C3 wrote:Hopefully Mr. Deng gets some respect now, all this criticism He has been receiving lately is shameful.



Why is it shameful? he hasn't been playing that well. If his play continues to to be good nobody will criticise him.


Not shameful at all. What's wrong with holding players up to a high standard?
ThreeYearPlan wrote:Bulls fans defend HomoSapien more than Rose.

Return to Chicago Bulls