ImageImage

NFL Draft 2011

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,763
And1: 6,963
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Re: NFL Draft 2011 

Post#41 » by LUKE23 » Tue Nov 2, 2010 6:11 pm

Agreed. Of any unit on the field, I may even be most comfortable with our ILBs going forward.


For me, it's the secondary in general assuming Harris is back next year and can at least be a good nickel (Woodson/Williams/Harris/Collins/Burnett/Peprah is pretty damn good), but ILB is definitely low on my list in terms of concern as well. The secondary also has age concerns at CB, so that will have to be addressed sooner rather than later.
User avatar
Wade-A-Holic
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,055
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 09, 2003

Re: NFL Draft 2011 

Post#42 » by Wade-A-Holic » Tue Nov 2, 2010 6:40 pm

LUKE23 wrote:
Agreed. Of any unit on the field, I may even be most comfortable with our ILBs going forward.


For me, it's the secondary in general assuming Harris is back next year and can at least be a good nickel (Woodson/Williams/Harris/Collins/Burnett/Peprah is pretty damn good), but ILB is definitely low on my list in terms of concern as well. The secondary also has age concerns at CB, so that will have to be addressed sooner rather than later.


Don't forget about Shields. I have a feeling he's going to be a LOT better next year with a full off season under his belt. He's been pretty good as it is, but I think the game will slow down for him a lot next year and we'll see him start to make plays.

I wish Burnett were more physical. Ideally, he's a free safety. Peprah's tackling is noticeable every week.
User avatar
PkrsBcksGphsMqt
RealGM
Posts: 18,827
And1: 1,417
Joined: Oct 27, 2005
Location: Madison
   

Re: NFL Draft 2011 

Post#43 » by PkrsBcksGphsMqt » Tue Nov 2, 2010 6:48 pm

I could see Shields turning into a faster version of Tramon, neither of these guys were drafted but appear to have good work ethics. They are about the same size as well.
BucksRuleAll22 wrote:Calvin Johnson is horrible and not a top WR.
User avatar
Wade-A-Holic
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,055
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 09, 2003

Re: NFL Draft 2011 

Post#44 » by Wade-A-Holic » Tue Nov 2, 2010 6:53 pm

There can't be many better feelings for a GM than when guys like Tramon Williams emerge the way he has.
User avatar
RiotPunch
RealGM
Posts: 27,697
And1: 18,076
Joined: Jul 05, 2009
Location: LA
     

Re: NFL Draft 2011 

Post#45 » by RiotPunch » Tue Nov 2, 2010 9:01 pm

LUKE23 wrote:Ayers has been my #1 want for a while, but he won't fall to us.


There is no denying his talent, but I think his pass rushing skills are a bit overrated. I'm sure it is something that can be taught to him, but watching him play I don't see that relentless drive to get to the QB.

That said, I think you're right that he will not be around when we pick.

I could see a number of different scenarios playing out for the Pack's first round. We could go pass rusher and grab a guy like Von Miller. But I believe someone dynamic will fall. I could picture a guy like Joseph Barksdale being there, who would be a great LT for us. I could see Julio Jones falling back that far, as people are questioning him right now. I could see Ras-I Dowling falling, and he would be a great longterm fit with Tramon. And sure, we could go ILB or RB with guys like Greg Jones and Mikel LeShoure... BEST PLAYER AVAILABLE.

Thankfully, I believe TT is a BPA guy as well.
#FreeChuckDiesel
Bucksmaniac wrote:I'm sorry, but I'm starting to sour on Giannis
eagle13
Head Coach
Posts: 6,145
And1: 107
Joined: Feb 15, 2007
Location: san diego

Re: NFL Draft 2011 

Post#46 » by eagle13 » Wed Nov 3, 2010 2:32 am

OL should be OK. Bulaga will be fine LT. Newhouse RT. Lang top utility man or LG.
We’ll lose either College or Spitz. Draft low rd.

DL is great IF Jolly and Neal return. Who cares about Harrell? I prefer Wilson & Green.

S is probably OK if Pep keeps looking good & Burnett returns full. Also 1 of bigby/smith.

CB could use a 3rd or 4th rdr if Tramon resigns. 1st or 2nd if not.

ILB = trade Barnett / Hawk walks – if both happen use 2nd / if one use 3rd.

OLB = 1st pick. Zombo & Jones = good reserves.

RB = 2nd – no certainty Grannt returns 100%.

K/PR – NEED IMPACT - .use 3rd

WR = Driver is still good but declining – ideal would be K/PR guy is WR.

1st = OLB
2nd = RB
3rd = WR-P/KR
3rd = ILB
4th = CB
5th = OL
6th = OL
7th = ILB
User avatar
PkrsBcksGphsMqt
RealGM
Posts: 18,827
And1: 1,417
Joined: Oct 27, 2005
Location: Madison
   

Re: NFL Draft 2011 

Post#47 » by PkrsBcksGphsMqt » Wed Nov 3, 2010 3:03 am

eagle13 wrote:OL should be OK. Bulaga will be fine LT. Newhouse RT. Lang top utility man or LG.
We’ll lose either College or Spitz. Draft low rd.

DL is great IF Jolly and Neal return. Who cares about Harrell? I prefer Wilson & Green.

S is probably OK if Pep keeps looking good & Burnett returns full. Also 1 of bigby/smith.

CB could use a 3rd or 4th rdr if Tramon resigns. 1st or 2nd if not.

ILB = trade Barnett / Hawk walks – if both happen use 2nd / if one use 3rd.

OLB = 1st pick. Zombo & Jones = good reserves.

RB = 2nd – no certainty Grannt returns 100%.

K/PR – NEED IMPACT - .use 3rd

WR = Driver is still good but declining – ideal would be K/PR guy is WR.

1st = OLB
2nd = RB
3rd = WR-P/KR
3rd = ILB
4th = CB
5th = OL
6th = OL
7th = ILB


I agree with most of what you said but this would be my ideal draft (hopefully it would be BPA):

1 = OLB
2 = ILB
3 = WR/KR
3 = CB
4 = RB
5 = OL
6 = QB
7 = OL

I don't think we need to take a RB in the first two rounds unless an absolute stud falls. I'd also like to take a QB late to see if we can develop him into a 3rd stringer and then make Harrell the 2nd stringer and then trade Flynn.
BucksRuleAll22 wrote:Calvin Johnson is horrible and not a top WR.
xTitan
RealGM
Posts: 17,135
And1: 2,283
Joined: Mar 03, 2006
     

Re: NFL Draft 2011 

Post#48 » by xTitan » Wed Nov 3, 2010 3:07 am

I have to laugh a little at Newhouse being pencil'd inb at tackle....c'mon man....
midranger
RealGM
Posts: 39,535
And1: 11,309
Joined: May 12, 2002

Re: NFL Draft 2011 

Post#49 » by midranger » Wed Nov 3, 2010 3:07 am

PackBuckGophZag wrote:I agree with most of what you said but this would be my ideal draft (hopefully it would be BPA):

1 = OLB
2 = ILB
3 = WR/KR
3 = CB
4 = RB
5 = OL
6 = QB
7 = OL


I am with this 100%. Of course BPA, but ideally it'd break down something like that.
Please reconsider your animal consumption.
midranger
RealGM
Posts: 39,535
And1: 11,309
Joined: May 12, 2002

Re: NFL Draft 2011 

Post#50 » by midranger » Wed Nov 3, 2010 3:08 am

xTitan wrote:I have to laugh a little at Newhouse being pencil'd inb at tackle....c'mon man....

He looked good this summer, but I think Lang has a better chance there.
Please reconsider your animal consumption.
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 107,885
And1: 42,173
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: NFL Draft 2011 

Post#51 » by ReasonablySober » Wed Nov 3, 2010 5:36 am

I'm still very surprised at the insistence that ILB is some sort of a need. I don't think there's a more unimportant position in football. Today's offenses have made the classic ILB an afterthought, especially in a 3-4. Patrick Willis is the game's best. His impact on the 49ers is negligent.

If you traded Barnett for Willis I'm 100% positive we're not winning any more games. Trade Zombo for Ware and I think we do.
User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
Posts: 35,604
And1: 4,456
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

Re: NFL Draft 2011 

Post#52 » by Kerb Hohl » Wed Nov 3, 2010 5:52 am

I'm also down for picking up an impact RB but I normally do not like filling that position in via high draft choice unless a Peterson, Johnson, Spiller, McFadden are available. I think there are easier ways to fill that position but I wouldn't complain. I'm not saying every 7th rounder turns into a magical back either.

That said, Jackson (who was a 2nd rounder, actually) has filled in decently and if he could run in short yardage would be be fine for the position.

But I'd take a RB, don't get me wrong.
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 107,885
And1: 42,173
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: NFL Draft 2011 

Post#53 » by ReasonablySober » Wed Nov 3, 2010 5:56 am

I don't see a special RB in this draft, but there are guys who will be quality starters or contributors. I wouldn't take a RB in the first round of this draft, though. Not even Ingram or Williams.
User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
Posts: 35,604
And1: 4,456
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

Re: NFL Draft 2011 

Post#54 » by Kerb Hohl » Wed Nov 3, 2010 6:07 am

Just wait for this guy?

Image

:D
midranger
RealGM
Posts: 39,535
And1: 11,309
Joined: May 12, 2002

Re: NFL Draft 2011 

Post#55 » by midranger » Wed Nov 3, 2010 12:09 pm

I disagree as you can probably tell DB. I think as teams go with more receiving options, the ILB's job becomes absolutely vital and he needs to be the most versatile player on the defense. He can't just pin his ears back and run at the QB (incredibly valuable, don't get me wrong), he has to diagnose, stuff the run, play coverage against an ever improving set of receiving TEs, spy the QB if he's mobile, and rush the passer effectively if called upon.

You don't think Brian Urlacher means a lot to the Bears defense? In his prime before the injuries, the guy would have something like 125 tackles, 6 sacks, 10 passes defensed, 5 INTs, and 5 forced fumbles per year. Granted, I don't expect to find a player as good as Brian Urlacher in this draft, but that versatility to do it all is HUGE in today's game.
Please reconsider your animal consumption.
eagle13
Head Coach
Posts: 6,145
And1: 107
Joined: Feb 15, 2007
Location: san diego

Re: NFL Draft 2011 

Post#56 » by eagle13 » Wed Nov 3, 2010 4:27 pm

midranger wrote:I disagree as you can probably tell DB. I think as teams go with more receiving options, the ILB's job becomes absolutely vital and he needs to be the most versatile player on the defense. He can't just pin his ears back and run at the QB (incredibly valuable, don't get me wrong), he has to diagnose, stuff the run, play coverage against an ever improving set of receiving TEs, spy the QB if he's mobile, and rush the passer effectively if called upon.

You don't think Brian Urlacher means a lot to the Bears defense? In his prime before the injuries, the guy would have something like 125 tackles, 6 sacks, 10 passes defensed, 5 INTs, and 5 forced fumbles per year. Granted, I don't expect to find a player as good as Brian Urlacher in this draft, but that versatility to do it all is HUGE in today's game.


Bears play 4-3 D. Big difference.
midranger
RealGM
Posts: 39,535
And1: 11,309
Joined: May 12, 2002

Re: NFL Draft 2011 

Post#57 » by midranger » Wed Nov 3, 2010 4:32 pm

I know they do.

Though, what do we not ask our ILBs to do that the Bears ask their MLB to do? Play coverage? Fill running lanes (and make tackles)? Play fast laterally? Rush the passer on occassion? Seriously. Why is our ILB position so useless?

A great ILB makes both your DL's and S's jobs much easier.
Please reconsider your animal consumption.

Return to Green Bay Packers