ImageImageImageImageImage

Should we trade Baron and Kaman and rebuild?

Moderators: og15, TrueLAfan

User avatar
PG3
Analyst
Posts: 3,045
And1: 6
Joined: Jul 05, 2005
Location: Carson, California

Re: Should we trade Baron and Kaman and rebuild? 

Post#21 » by PG3 » Mon Nov 1, 2010 11:59 pm

sutrick wrote:ABSOLUTELY. However to be realistic only Washington would be willing to take Baron but Arenas would be a better player albeit not the best role model. However, is an out of shape, don't give a damn, over the hill player worse for young players than a crazy one??

Kaman probably can be traded and he must be the worst player ever to get the stats he has this year. He's terrible.

I don't think the decision to keep or trade Davis and Kaman has much to do with changing the amount of wins. Neither will positively contribute to many wind this year.


I dont think Washington would want Baron since they already have 3 capable PGs in Wall, Hinrich and Arenas. As i think about it, There are a lot of good PGs in the NBA right now which makes it harder to trade Baron on top of his bloated contract. I cant think up of a trade scenario with the Bobcats that gets us cap relief. We can do a Baron/G-Wallace kinda deal but i doubt they'll do that.
PSN: Redstar231
User avatar
PG3
Analyst
Posts: 3,045
And1: 6
Joined: Jul 05, 2005
Location: Carson, California

Re: Should we trade Baron and Kaman and rebuild? 

Post#22 » by PG3 » Tue Nov 2, 2010 12:03 am

How bout this?

Clippers trade
Baron Davis
Chris Kaman

Pistons trade
Rodney Stuckey
Tayshaun Prince
Chris Wilcox
Jason Maxiell
PSN: Redstar231
User avatar
jflipclip
Pro Prospect
Posts: 961
And1: 4
Joined: Jul 07, 2007
Location: SoCal

Re: Should we trade Baron and Kaman and rebuild? 

Post#23 » by jflipclip » Tue Nov 2, 2010 3:11 am

Kaman is still valuable to the team in my eyes. Solid center, although it is looking like he's losing his place in this new offense. He'll find his way through it though.

Baron on the other hand... I lost all hope with him last season.
DraftSpecialist
Sophomore
Posts: 147
And1: 0
Joined: May 21, 2005

Re: Should we trade Baron and Kaman and rebuild? 

Post#24 » by DraftSpecialist » Tue Nov 2, 2010 3:14 am

I'm not high on trading Kaman and Baron while there value is at a low. Especially so early in the season. We need better bench play. Our lack of depth hurt us last year, especially late in games where we were constantly unable to finish. We also need another ball handler.

Personally I would rather wait and see if Foye can step up and help fill that role along with Aminu and Bledsoe progressing into solid role players this year. If that happens and we get good bench play I think we are a playoff team. But I don't think anything we move Kaman or Davis will do that for us.
User avatar
SportsFan215
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,992
And1: 60
Joined: Jun 23, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Should we trade Baron and Kaman and rebuild? 

Post#25 » by SportsFan215 » Tue Nov 2, 2010 4:01 am

Yes we should, especially Kaman before he loses all of his value.
kombayn
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,135
And1: 755
Joined: Dec 15, 2005
         

Re: Should we trade Baron and Kaman and rebuild? 

Post#26 » by kombayn » Tue Nov 2, 2010 4:57 am

We need to blow it up. I don't want the team to go 0-18 breaking an NBA record. Right now, I'm not a fan of Vinny Del Negro at all.
illastrate
Starter
Posts: 2,251
And1: 636
Joined: Aug 16, 2006
   

Re: Should we trade Baron and Kaman and rebuild? 

Post#27 » by illastrate » Tue Nov 2, 2010 8:34 am

PG3 wrote:How bout this?

Clippers trade
Baron Davis
Chris Kaman

Pistons trade
Rodney Stuckey
Tayshaun Prince
Chris Wilcox
Jason Maxiell


Not bad, I would pull the trigger on that, but I have another one:

Baron to the Bobcats for Livingston/Diaw

And then, Kaman + other pieces for Melo.
User avatar
Rodddman
Junior
Posts: 273
And1: 5
Joined: Aug 07, 2010

Re: Should we trade Baron and Kaman and rebuild? 

Post#28 » by Rodddman » Tue Nov 2, 2010 12:49 pm

Kaman and the Pistons is a match made in Heaven.

The only team dumb enough to take on Baron's contract is the Clippers, and unfortunately teams can't dump contracts onto themselves.
"Left hand, right hand, it doesn't matter. I'm amphibious." - Charles Shackleford
User avatar
Tommy Udo 6
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 42,507
And1: 28
Joined: Jun 13, 2003
Location: San Francisco/East Bay CA

Re: Should we trade Baron and Kaman and rebuild? 

Post#29 » by Tommy Udo 6 » Tue Nov 2, 2010 8:23 pm

mj_shoefanatic wrote:It will be nearly impossible to trade Baron and his bloated contract. Plus, Baron is looking to pass first more this season which I kinda like. However, Kaveman might be a little easier to move by the trade deadline then just have DJ start for us with Collins backing him up.


It gets worse: Kamen's Contract has a trade kicker for the lesser of 15% or $4 million.

At this point 15% of $24.5 million remaining is $3,675,000.

I think he's just too expensive for most teams' budget
The gem cannot be polished without friction, nor man perfected without trials.
- -- Chinese proverb
Rumac60
Ballboy
Posts: 27
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 10, 2001

Re: Should we trade Baron and Kaman and rebuild? 

Post#30 » by Rumac60 » Wed Nov 3, 2010 1:48 pm

Kaman/ Davis for Rip/ Tay/ JJ or Summers or TMac. Although the other deal involving Stuckey/ Wilcox/ Tay/ Max might be more appealing to the Clips, while the former is probably more balanced. 8-) Either way a deal for BOTH teams needs to made. :roll:
User avatar
mattfish
Senior
Posts: 529
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 21, 2008

Re: Should we trade Baron and Kaman and rebuild? 

Post#31 » by mattfish » Wed Nov 3, 2010 4:36 pm

Rodddman wrote:Kaman and the Pistons is a match made in Heaven.

The only team dumb enough to take on Baron's contract is the Clippers, and unfortunately teams can't dump contracts onto themselves.


How about Minnesota? The Knicks? At least one team has to be dumber than the Clippers! At least we fared better than Golden State signing Maggette for all that money and getting Charlie Bell and Dan Gadzuric in return.
User avatar
Det the Threat
Head Coach
Posts: 6,384
And1: 374
Joined: Aug 29, 2004
Location: Germany
   

Re: Should we trade Baron and Kaman and rebuild? 

Post#32 » by Det the Threat » Wed Nov 3, 2010 6:21 pm

mattfish wrote:
Rodddman wrote:Kaman and the Pistons is a match made in Heaven.

The only team dumb enough to take on Baron's contract is the Clippers, and unfortunately teams can't dump contracts onto themselves.


How about Minnesota? The Knicks? At least one team has to be dumber than the Clippers! At least we fared better than Golden State signing Maggette for all that money and getting Charlie Bell and Dan Gadzuric in return.


Charlie Bell and Dan Gadzuric would be a great package for Baron...
User avatar
Recently
Senior
Posts: 730
And1: 1
Joined: Apr 03, 2010

Re: Should we trade Baron and Kaman and rebuild? 

Post#33 » by Recently » Thu Nov 4, 2010 2:19 am

Really wish we had steve blake still. Only downside to dumping baron right now is i don't think bledsoe is ready at all. He should probably be eased in slowly rather than throw into the fire directly. Maybe he will surprise me though, hes getting the start again today and did ok last game i guess.
User avatar
Recently
Senior
Posts: 730
And1: 1
Joined: Apr 03, 2010

Re: Should we trade Baron and Kaman and rebuild? 

Post#34 » by Recently » Thu Nov 4, 2010 6:49 am

Well i take back what i said about bledsoe, maybe he IS ready. I wish we still had steve blake though lol.
Volcano
RealGM
Posts: 16,024
And1: 7,780
Joined: Jan 17, 2005

Re: Should we trade Baron and Kaman and rebuild? 

Post#35 » by Volcano » Thu Nov 4, 2010 7:56 am

anyone think Bledsoe's worth picking up for a fantasy team? Is he legit?

I hope Baron becomes bench fodder..what are the chances of that
Spider156
Head Coach
Posts: 6,613
And1: 1,421
Joined: Jul 25, 2010
       

Re: Should we trade Baron and Kaman and rebuild? 

Post#36 » by Spider156 » Thu Nov 4, 2010 8:09 am

Rumac60 wrote:Kaman/ Davis for Rip/ Tay/ JJ or Summers or TMac. Although the other deal involving Stuckey/ Wilcox/ Tay/ Max might be more appealing to the Clips, while the former is probably more balanced. 8-) Either way a deal for BOTH teams needs to made. :roll:

I would do this trade in a heart beat. I LOVE it. This is from a Pistons fans.
Defense wins championships
User avatar
Recently
Senior
Posts: 730
And1: 1
Joined: Apr 03, 2010

Re: Should we trade Baron and Kaman and rebuild? 

Post#37 » by Recently » Thu Nov 4, 2010 9:30 am

Volcano wrote:anyone think Bledsoe's worth picking up for a fantasy team? Is he legit?

I hope Baron becomes bench fodder..what are the chances of that


Depends how deep. If you're in a competitive 12 man league with 14 deep rosters, or 14+ man league, he might be good for a short term add. If you're in a shallower league or less competitive league... probably not as its too hard to say how consistent he will be.

Backups in general aren't great for fantasy unless they are the 6th or 7th man in a short rotation, so once baron gets back his fantasy value is virtually nil. I'm assuming baron will be out around a week (dunno, not really basing this off anything though, just a gut feeling haha)
jgustav1
Analyst
Posts: 3,367
And1: 21
Joined: Jul 29, 2003

Re: Should we trade Baron and Kaman and rebuild? 

Post#38 » by jgustav1 » Thu Nov 4, 2010 1:57 pm

Rumac60 wrote:Kaman/ Davis for Rip/ Tay/ JJ or Summers or TMac. Although the other deal involving Stuckey/ Wilcox/ Tay/ Max might be more appealing to the Clips, while the former is probably more balanced. 8-) Either way a deal for BOTH teams needs to made. :roll:


Any trade involving Kaman and the Pistons would need to involve Monroe coming back to the Clippers as part of it.
Spider156
Head Coach
Posts: 6,613
And1: 1,421
Joined: Jul 25, 2010
       

Re: Should we trade Baron and Kaman and rebuild? 

Post#39 » by Spider156 » Thu Nov 4, 2010 6:26 pm

jgustav1 wrote:
Rumac60 wrote:Kaman/ Davis for Rip/ Tay/ JJ or Summers or TMac. Although the other deal involving Stuckey/ Wilcox/ Tay/ Max might be more appealing to the Clips, while the former is probably more balanced. 8-) Either way a deal for BOTH teams needs to made. :roll:


Any trade involving Kaman and the Pistons would need to involve Monroe coming back to the Clippers as part of it.

As far as I'm concerned. I think Monroe is the only untouchable player on this team. Everyone else is fair game for the right deal.
Defense wins championships
User avatar
donemilio21
Analyst
Posts: 3,120
And1: 845
Joined: Aug 20, 2009
Location: Santa Barbara
   

Re: Should we trade Baron and Kaman and rebuild? 

Post#40 » by donemilio21 » Sat Nov 6, 2010 5:11 am

TRADE them both!

Return to Los Angeles Clippers