Harden, the under-the-radar bust

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

User avatar
Esohny
RealGM
Posts: 11,613
And1: 339
Joined: Apr 18, 2009
Location: Saint Paul
     

Re: Harden, the under-the-radar bust 

Post#41 » by Esohny » Sun Nov 7, 2010 4:35 am

:roll: at this thread.
SMAC-K wrote:Mayo>>>>Love and that 5th pick
OJ Mayo is one of the best defenders in the league, hes a two way player and hes a great passer and playmaker.
User avatar
illiance
RealGM
Posts: 16,367
And1: 507
Joined: Jan 26, 2009

Re: Harden, the under-the-radar bust 

Post#42 » by illiance » Sun Nov 7, 2010 5:11 am

Chemistry and glue guys are two of the most overrated and overused words by the media. You don't spend the #3 overall pick on a glue guy. Those are reserved for end of 1st rounders/second rounders. They should have taken Evans like any other team would have, if not trade down and acquire more pieces rather than wasting it on a career bench player.
cokekong
Freshman
Posts: 86
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 23, 2007

Re: Harden, the under-the-radar bust 

Post#43 » by cokekong » Sun Nov 7, 2010 5:43 am

blackstar wrote:
slick_watts wrote:
Number 3 overall picks: OJ Mayo, Al Horford, Adam Morrison, Deron Williams, Ben Gordon, Carmelo Anthony, Mike Dunleavy, Pau Gasol, Darius Miles, Baron Davis, Raef LaFrentz.

So by your definition half the number three picks in the last 12 years are busts? Mayo, Morrison, Gordon, Dunleavy, Miles, and LaFrentz are not All Star caliber players.

At worst, IMO, Harden will be a sixth man type long term who will score off the bench, defend, and do a bit of everything. Which isn't a bad thing to have.


Gordon is an all-league caliber player. There aren't many players in the nba with his shooting ability, especially in the clutch. he's already proven, as demonstrated by singlehandedly keeping the bulls in the series against the celtics.


Speaking of under-the-radar...how did this sig worth post slip under??? lmao at BEN GORDON being an all-league caliber player...KG and Charlie V are more likely to become best bros than ben gordon making even THIRD team all league.
DRK
RealGM
Posts: 12,178
And1: 3,609
Joined: Feb 28, 2010
Location: Kentucky Suns
Contact:
   

Re: Harden, the under-the-radar bust 

Post#44 » by DRK » Sun Nov 7, 2010 6:22 am

Harden got no where near the same amount of minutes as Mayo and Gordon got in their rookie years. Its plain stupid to compare their stats. You have to look at their team situation, instead of just looking at stats.

The Tunder started Thabo ahead of Harden because of his defense. Thabo is the best on ball defender in the league, and compliemtns Westbrook and Durant very nicely.

GoLakers2011 wrote:
RunMCR wrote:
boogydown wrote:Imagine if OKC had drafted Evans. It would be the most lethal back court of all time.


They would be worse..Now Curry or Jennings is a different story. Evans is too ball dominant to succeed on a team where 2 players are better than him by a wide margin. He's almost useless off-ball

Westbrook is not better than Evans. Durant is.


SMH at you. Do you even read before you post?
MrMiyagi wrote:Lob to DA for the win
User avatar
KevinMcreynolds
RealGM
Posts: 13,173
And1: 3,494
Joined: Feb 07, 2010
Location: Sacramento
     

Re: Harden, the under-the-radar bust 

Post#45 » by KevinMcreynolds » Sun Nov 7, 2010 6:51 am

Harden = Mo Pete 2.0
floppymoose wrote:Too much Vlad. Sixers can't handle it. Solid gold.

"I'm a big proponent of footwork. Believe me." ~Jim Barnett
User avatar
dream_catcher_9
Veteran
Posts: 2,548
And1: 2
Joined: Nov 20, 2009

Re: Harden, the under-the-radar bust 

Post#46 » by dream_catcher_9 » Sun Nov 7, 2010 6:52 am

illiance wrote:Chemistry and glue guys are two of the most overrated and overused words by the media. You don't spend the #3 overall pick on a glue guy. Those are reserved for end of 1st rounders/second rounders. They should have taken Evans like any other team would have, if not trade down and acquire more pieces rather than wasting it on a career bench player.


Evans is a terrible fit on this thunder team. OKC needed a player who can compliment Westbrook and Durant. Someone who doesn't need the ball in their hands all the time to be effective, someone who can spot up from the perimeter and shoot 3's and drive to the rim, and keep the ball moving. Harden with the proper development will become just that as well as a good defender. Pretty much a perfect fit if he develops right.

It's funny how so many people are writing off a player because of their rookie season. Lets wait 4 or 5 years and we should have a much better understanding of each player.
User avatar
shamu
Senior
Posts: 524
And1: 2
Joined: Nov 25, 2009
Location: here and there, now and then

Re: Harden, the under-the-radar bust 

Post#47 » by shamu » Sun Nov 7, 2010 8:44 am

KevinMcreynolds wrote:Harden = Mo Pete 2.0

If Harden can become a Motivated and consistent Mo-Pete and sustain that type of play for a long period, he would fit in perfectly with Durant and Westbrook. A bust at three, yes, but if that's his floor (imo it is), it's not too bad for the Thunder. I believe he will be a border line all star myself, perhaps a middle class mans Joe Johnson.
kingkirk
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 80,406
And1: 23,765
Joined: Jan 24, 2004
 

Re: Harden, the under-the-radar bust 

Post#48 » by kingkirk » Sun Nov 7, 2010 9:44 am

He needs to get out of OKC if he is ever to develop. Durant and Westbrook are getting 20 shots, Green 15, he wont be an offensive force at all if he stays in OKC.

He can be a good player, though im surprised that he hasnt lived up to the hype.
gensu3k1
Senior
Posts: 728
And1: 2
Joined: Jun 22, 2003

Re: Harden, the under-the-radar bust 

Post#49 » by gensu3k1 » Sun Nov 7, 2010 9:58 am

So I guess Harden being such an awful finisher for over a year is because he's not getting enough minutes? When he lumbers through the lane and bricks runners and layups over and over, is it because he wishes he was starting for the Kings?
Zach Randolph + Kevin Durant >>>>>>> Greg Oden. Bob Whitsitt>>>>>> Kevin Pritchard.
"Jan Vesely, this guy can really shoot it." --Jay Bilas, 2011
KidDelicious
Sophomore
Posts: 173
And1: 0
Joined: Oct 28, 2009

Re: Harden, the under-the-radar bust 

Post#50 » by KidDelicious » Sun Nov 7, 2010 10:31 am

tyreke evans is so overrated its ridiculous... that being said. once harden starts getting real minutes and stops being jerked around by brooks he will show everyone what he can do. hes a borderline all star second option type player imo..
Fear the Beard!!
User avatar
qianlong
Starter
Posts: 2,258
And1: 258
Joined: Jun 07, 2010
 

Re: Harden, the under-the-radar bust 

Post#51 » by qianlong » Sun Nov 7, 2010 11:17 am

Harden is doing what OKC is asking him to do, that's way his stats are not on par with the common expectation for a 3rd pick. he could perfectly become what the thunder need but underdevelop from a league or personal point of view, if he is asked to become a good role player he won't become an all star.

If OKC decided that thabo is good enough for them, the Bulls would really like to trade for him
Ball don't lie
SKR
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,442
And1: 731
Joined: Jan 28, 2010
 

Re: Harden, the under-the-radar bust 

Post#52 » by SKR » Sun Nov 7, 2010 2:09 pm

Harden will be just fine. Book it. He will be a servicable guard, either starting or a 6th man, but he will be just fine.
draft
Starter
Posts: 2,126
And1: 8
Joined: May 27, 2007

Re: Harden, the under-the-radar bust 

Post#53 » by draft » Sun Nov 7, 2010 2:19 pm

If Harden played in GS last year, he would have put up similar numbers to Curry.
In OKC he's the 4th option and coming off the bench. He doesn't get a chance to showcase his skills. Thabo is starting because he fits in better with the starting unit.
SKR
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,442
And1: 731
Joined: Jan 28, 2010
 

Re: Harden, the under-the-radar bust 

Post#54 » by SKR » Sun Nov 7, 2010 2:34 pm

draft wrote:If Harden played in GS last year, he would have put up similar numbers to Curry.


But he actually wouldn't have...
You are either seriously underestimating Curry or the situation in GSW last year.
I like Harden and I'm not trying to make him look bad or anything, but seriously :

Curry is MUCH better shooter than Harden. 44% from three is something else, come on. And Harden is indeed nice handling the ball and passing for that matter, BUT with him being the starting SG with Monta being the primary ballhandler, Harden wouldn't have been able to dribble and create and the assist number wouldn't be there.
umopapisdn
Banned User
Posts: 589
And1: 2
Joined: Jul 10, 2010

Re: Harden, the under-the-radar bust 

Post#55 » by umopapisdn » Sun Nov 7, 2010 3:30 pm

illiance wrote:Chemistry and glue guys are two of the most overrated and overused words by the media. You don't spend the #3 overall pick on a glue guy. Those are reserved for end of 1st rounders/second rounders. They should have taken Evans like any other team would have, if not trade down and acquire more pieces rather than wasting it on a career bench player.

:roll: Most teams would consider it a success if their late 1st/2nd round pick was still in the NBA 3 years after draft day. Most lottery players are not stars- most of the time you are happy with getting a starter.
GoLakers2011
Banned User
Posts: 669
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 04, 2010

Re: Harden, the under-the-radar bust 

Post#56 » by GoLakers2011 » Sun Nov 7, 2010 3:34 pm

RunMCR wrote:SMH at you. Do you even read before you post?


Do you? You have got to be on crack to think Westbrook > Evans.
User avatar
fallacy
RealGM
Posts: 10,496
And1: 607
Joined: Jan 11, 2010
       

Re: Harden, the under-the-radar bust 

Post#57 » by fallacy » Sun Nov 7, 2010 3:44 pm

GoLakers2011 wrote:
RunMCR wrote:SMH at you. Do you even read before you post?


Do you? You have got to be on crack to think Westbrook > Evans.


Westbrook > Evans

Biggest difference:

Westbrook - 47 FT's attempted - 94% shooting
Evans - 27 FT's attempted - 70% shooting

Westbrook has shot the most FT's in the league so far
Westbrook is the best rebounding PG in the league. For people who say it's kidd:

Westbrook - 11% TRB%
Kidd - 8 TRB%
**** Ron Artest
**** Marco Belinelli
Stephen Jackson aint bout dis lyfe
Patrick Beverly deserves to have his knee ripped to pieces
slick_watts
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,544
And1: 6,802
Joined: Jan 03, 2005
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Harden, the under-the-radar bust 

Post#58 » by slick_watts » Sun Nov 7, 2010 4:26 pm

I don't see Westbrook continuing to score as efficiently as he has been. His TS is 55% which is great, but that's entirely due to his free throw shooting. I don't think he'll maintain his FTA rate that he has going right now, and he definitely won't shoot 94% from the line for the entire season. His eFG% is right in line with his career mark so he isn't really shooting any better from the field.

Westbrook at ~54-55% TS is better than Evans, though, in my opinion.
User avatar
Relentless88
RealGM
Posts: 11,794
And1: 101
Joined: Apr 08, 2008
       

Re: Harden, the under-the-radar bust 

Post#59 » by Relentless88 » Sun Nov 7, 2010 5:33 pm

When you don't get consistent minutes, that's what you get. James Harder was great in pre-season and had the opportunity there. OKC has a ton of offense and so Thabo getting minutes at the 2 makes sense for them. That leaves Harden out getting garbage time.

He is not a bust, not even close.
User avatar
GswSucks4Ever
Pro Prospect
Posts: 777
And1: 140
Joined: Nov 25, 2002

Re: Harden, the under-the-radar bust 

Post#60 » by GswSucks4Ever » Sun Nov 7, 2010 5:34 pm

Under average athlete at his position, no skills to impact a game, not making a lot of mistakes is not an impact. He is not discernibly better than Kelenna Azubuike, Anthony Morrow, or Reggie Williams, all competent swing men that we're undrafted that played for the Warriors. So yes, he's a bust. And no, he would have been nowhere near the ROY on the Warriors.

Return to The General Board