Post#109 » by tk76 » Mon Nov 8, 2010 4:29 am
Its hard to say, since I'm mostly focusing my attention on player development (on the Sixers) since their season is not about W/L.
-Amare looks good. I always wondered how he would do without Nash. But he does need to have a PG he can develop some chemistry with. He only ran the P&R once like he used to with Nash.
-TD looked great. I'm not sure he has PG instincts, but should fill a role as a pesky defender who can score and give energy. Sort of like a Nate without being a loose cannon.
-Gallinari always has that dumb deer in the headlights look, but he's a pure shooter. I've seen him more aggressive. But he looks like a guy who could really thrive on a good team where he was left wide open. As long as there is a guy looking for him. He'd be great with Lebron on the Heat, because Lebron would give him great looks, and Gallinari would not have to demand the ball to get his looks. But if you get Melo with Amare I'm doubting Gallinari gets touches. Unless you had a PG who really took charge.
-Turiaf looked afraid to do anything offensively. I realize he lacks skills, but its a bit of a waste of all of that energy.
-Chandler looks like a good guy fr a bench role. He's versatile, but does not look like he has any great strength he can utilize. And seems like the type who will get himself in trouble trying to do too much. How is he defensively?
-Mozgov looks really raw. Passive too. Defineitly has NBA size and moves fluidly. Does he every attack or show aggression?
-AR looks like he's filled out, but not really with muscle. He looks less explosive out there. Is he hurt, or just emotionally damaged and in the dog-house?
-Fields looks fine. I realize he had a bad game. But he's another guy like Chandler who can do a bit of everything, but probably lack much of a ceiling. A good 2nd round pick, but I doubt he'll ever be a top reserve or above average starter. Not a bad guy to have though.