ImageImageImage

Game 8: Sacramento Kings@Phoenix Suns

Moderators: bwgood77, Qwigglez, lilfishi22

User avatar
TheMan44
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,431
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 09, 2009

Re: Game 8: Sacramento Kings@Phoenix Suns 

Post#261 » by TheMan44 » Sat Nov 13, 2010 9:21 am

Glad Suns won.

Not glad Hedo continued to start.

Not glad Lopez did not produce significantly.

Not glad Lopez/Hedo/Frye continue to rebound like little girls while backcourt (Nash, Rich, Childress) continue to do all the rebounding for this team.
"Lead, follow, or get out of the way." -Thomas Paine
BurningHeart
General Manager
Posts: 9,725
And1: 1,629
Joined: Jun 02, 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: Game 8: Sacramento Kings@Phoenix Suns 

Post#262 » by BurningHeart » Sat Nov 13, 2010 10:02 am

We have GOT to give Lawal a shot.
DRK
RealGM
Posts: 12,178
And1: 3,609
Joined: Feb 28, 2010
Location: Kentucky Suns
Contact:
   

Re: Game 8: Sacramento Kings@Phoenix Suns 

Post#263 » by DRK » Sat Nov 13, 2010 1:38 pm

BurningHeart wrote:We have GOT to give Lawal a shot.


+1.

For a guy that the fans and the coaching staff raved about after drafting him, he should not be on the freakin' inactive list.
MrMiyagi wrote:Lob to DA for the win
User avatar
rsavaj
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 24,863
And1: 2,767
Joined: May 09, 2007
Location: Phoenix, Arizona

Re: Game 8: Sacramento Kings@Phoenix Suns 

Post#264 » by rsavaj » Sat Nov 13, 2010 5:18 pm

Da_Reel_Kboy wrote:
BurningHeart wrote:We have GOT to give Lawal a shot.


+1.

For a guy that the fans and the coaching staff raved about after drafting him, he should not be on the freakin' inactive list.


Who else can you inactivate though instead?
User avatar
Miklo
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 7,674
And1: 278
Joined: Jan 23, 2005
Location: North Carolina
     

Re: Game 8: Sacramento Kings@Phoenix Suns 

Post#265 » by Miklo » Sat Nov 13, 2010 6:00 pm

rsavaj wrote:
Da_Reel_Kboy wrote:
BurningHeart wrote:We have GOT to give Lawal a shot.


+1.

For a guy that the fans and the coaching staff raved about after drafting him, he should not be on the freakin' inactive list.


Who else can you inactivate though instead?


Isn't Earl Clark active right now? And I don't mean on the basketball court. Whammy. But yeah I'm pretty sure it's Dwayne Jones and Lawal inactive, swap out EC to give Lawal a shot and you can keep Siler available too.
Fo-Real
General Manager
Posts: 9,774
And1: 5,485
Joined: Mar 21, 2009
     

Re: Game 8: Sacramento Kings@Phoenix Suns 

Post#266 » by Fo-Real » Sat Nov 13, 2010 6:26 pm

D. Jones got cut.... Its Lawal and Janning on the inactive. Yeah, Clark is lookin deactivated to me man. :D
User avatar
Miklo
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 7,674
And1: 278
Joined: Jan 23, 2005
Location: North Carolina
     

Re: Game 8: Sacramento Kings@Phoenix Suns 

Post#267 » by Miklo » Sat Nov 13, 2010 6:38 pm

Fo-Real wrote:D. Jones got cut.... Its Lawal and Janning on the inactive. Yeah, Clark is lookin deactivated to me man. :D


Oh yeah JANNING, lol we kept Siler instead of D Jones. Right. Well Still swap EC!
User avatar
JohnVancouver
General Manager
Posts: 9,016
And1: 236
Joined: Jun 18, 2007
Location: Vancouver, BC

Re: Game 8: Sacramento Kings@Phoenix Suns 

Post#268 » by JohnVancouver » Sat Nov 13, 2010 8:47 pm

I'm with you guys - we need to platoon EC and Lawal on/off the inactive list - Janning knew he was only insurance, and that he would sit most of the year. No ego probs there - but we do need to see what these two can do.
"Deng and Mozgov was some 1980s Clippers sh*t. So, so dumb" - Sedale Threatt

"If you can't get banned for threatening to rape a mod, what can you get banned for?" Jigga_Man/2013

"Everybody love Everybody." - Jackie Moon
User avatar
Kerrsed
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 29,876
And1: 16,578
Joined: Mar 31, 2009
Location: Land of the Internet Memes
Contact:
     

Re: Game 8: Sacramento Kings@Phoenix Suns 

Post#269 » by Kerrsed » Sat Nov 13, 2010 11:29 pm

We have a tough couple of weeks ahead of us, so i say keep Clark on the active list. During the blowout games we can throw Clark some minutes and hopefully increase his trade value.
Its #DUMPSTERFIRE SEASON! #TeamTRAINWRECK -KERRSED- The Mod, The Myth, The Legend
Image
BurningHeart
General Manager
Posts: 9,725
And1: 1,629
Joined: Jun 02, 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: Game 8: Sacramento Kings@Phoenix Suns 

Post#270 » by BurningHeart » Sat Nov 13, 2010 11:48 pm

I'd rather have someone in there to just get rebounds. I seriously dont care if he goes 0-3 with 1 point, as long as he gets rebounds. Don't care if he's raw.
DRK
RealGM
Posts: 12,178
And1: 3,609
Joined: Feb 28, 2010
Location: Kentucky Suns
Contact:
   

Re: Game 8: Sacramento Kings@Phoenix Suns 

Post#271 » by DRK » Sun Nov 14, 2010 1:49 am

I would cut Siler to see what Lawal can do. Siler's offensive game is tragic anyway. We only have him there for rebounds. Lawal on the other hand gives you rebounds and a bit of offense.
MrMiyagi wrote:Lob to DA for the win
User avatar
JohnVancouver
General Manager
Posts: 9,016
And1: 236
Joined: Jun 18, 2007
Location: Vancouver, BC

Re: Game 8: Sacramento Kings@Phoenix Suns 

Post#272 » by JohnVancouver » Sun Nov 14, 2010 8:16 am

Da_Reel_Kboy wrote:I would cut Siler to see what Lawal can do. Siler's offensive game is tragic anyway. We only have him there for rebounds. Lawal on the other hand gives you rebounds and a bit of offense.


DEactivate him sure, so we can get a look at Lawal, but geez - Siler is so cheap and shows so much promise, let's keep him around awhile
"Deng and Mozgov was some 1980s Clippers sh*t. So, so dumb" - Sedale Threatt

"If you can't get banned for threatening to rape a mod, what can you get banned for?" Jigga_Man/2013

"Everybody love Everybody." - Jackie Moon
RunDogGun
No Sham, More Cam
Posts: 17,891
And1: 5,437
Joined: Jun 27, 2009
Location: Beyond the Sun

Re: Game 8: Sacramento Kings@Phoenix Suns 

Post#273 » by RunDogGun » Sun Nov 14, 2010 9:41 am

The tough part is Lawal wasn't exactly grabbing a ton of boards in the preseason, and royally sucked from the freethrow line. I would like to see him get some burn, but for some reason, I don't think he will get the minutes even if he is activated. Siler hasn't received any minutes even when we desperately needed boards and toughness, why would we think Lawal would get minutes?
DRK
RealGM
Posts: 12,178
And1: 3,609
Joined: Feb 28, 2010
Location: Kentucky Suns
Contact:
   

Re: Game 8: Sacramento Kings@Phoenix Suns 

Post#274 » by DRK » Sun Nov 14, 2010 12:12 pm

JohnVancouver wrote:
Da_Reel_Kboy wrote:I would cut Siler to see what Lawal can do. Siler's offensive game is tragic anyway. We only have him there for rebounds. Lawal on the other hand gives you rebounds and a bit of offense.


DEactivate him sure, so we can get a look at Lawal, but geez - Siler is so cheap and shows so much promise, let's keep him around awhile


Sorry. I meant de-activate.
MrMiyagi wrote:Lob to DA for the win
User avatar
lilfishi22
Forum Mod - Suns
Forum Mod - Suns
Posts: 36,211
And1: 24,570
Joined: Oct 16, 2007
Location: Australia

Re: Game 8: Sacramento Kings@Phoenix Suns 

Post#275 » by lilfishi22 » Sun Nov 14, 2010 5:33 pm

Siler was never signed for his rebounding anyway, he was just a defender with a big body. I think we are too concerned about Lawal's size and ability to match up defensively against other bigs even though he could be a decent rebounder. Offensively we're don't expect from him either so I think we see him as a bit of a liability on both ends of the court.

Return to Phoenix Suns