How many 2nds would you give up?

Post #1 » by **Klomp** » Thu Nov 18, 2010 4:47 am

They talked about this numerous times tonight. I believe the highest they went was 4 or 5 in their back and forth. So now I ask you, how many 2nds would you have traded to acquire Michael Beasley?

Krapinsky · Post #2 » by **Krapinsky** » Thu Nov 18, 2010 4:56 am

Post #3 » by **Baphomet** » Thu Nov 18, 2010 4:56 am

All the 2nds there are.

allweneedisLOVE · Post #4 » by **allweneedisLOVE** » Thu Nov 18, 2010 6:03 am

I know some people who could lose some weight, so I'll take theirs.

Den Masters · Post #5 » by **Den Masters** » Thu Nov 18, 2010 6:08 am

the highest that the announcers said was "probably 7" lol.
if i was a gm, honestly, i wouldn't mind giving a first round pick for beasley. this is the guy who went second overall pick in 2008.

theGreatRC · Post #6 » by **theGreatRC** » Thu Nov 18, 2010 6:10 am

This many

kandiking · Post #7 » by **kandiking** » Thu Nov 18, 2010 6:30 am

All the 2nds ever ever.

shangrila · Post #8 » by **shangrila** » Thu Nov 18, 2010 6:37 am

I'd go as high as a first.

But you know, I'm like, crazy and stuff

Post #9 » by **Worm Guts** » Thu Nov 18, 2010 1:45 pm

Post #10 » by **C.lupus** » Thu Nov 18, 2010 2:08 pm

I'd give them two because that's all they asked for.

cpfsf · Post #11 » by **cpfsf** » Thu Nov 18, 2010 2:31 pm

I wanted to make a thread on the trade board asking What pick would you give to acquire Beasley. We were offered #10 for Flynn during the summer, I don't think I'm a homer to believe we could get a pick in the 10-14 range. I wouldn't do that trade, but I just want to know what we could get.

Krapinsky · Post #12 » by **Krapinsky** » Thu Nov 18, 2010 6:01 pm

Well, I'll take Beasley over Turner and Turner was #2.

Would you trade Beasley for anyone in the draft last year not named John Wall?

Den Masters · Post #13 » by **Den Masters** » Thu Nov 18, 2010 6:21 pm

Krapinsky wrote:Well, I'll take Beasley over Turner and Turner was #2.

Would you trade Beasley for anyone in the draft last year not named John Wall?

Nope.

Riley kind of made a mistake drafting Beasley, because right after 2008 draft lottery, when Heat found out that they got #2 overall pick, they were going to get OJ Mayo. Their real target was Rose though.

shangrila · Post #14 » by **shangrila** » Thu Nov 18, 2010 10:51 pm

Den Masters wrote:
Krapinsky wrote:Well, I'll take Beasley over Turner and Turner was #2.

Would you trade Beasley for anyone in the draft last year not named John Wall?

Nope.

Riley kind of made a mistake drafting Beasley, because right after 2008 draft lottery, when Heat found out that they got #2 overall pick, they were going to get OJ Mayo. Their real target was Rose though.

I remember thinking how pathetic that season was. They basically benched anyone decent for scrubs from the D-League and their coach didn't even bother to turn up to games down the stretch, instead preferring to scout Derrick Rose. I was so happy when karma gave them the big middle finger, just like it's doing now.

Foye · Post #15 » by **Foye** » Thu Nov 18, 2010 10:54 pm

shangrila wrote:
Den Masters wrote:
Krapinsky wrote:Well, I'll take Beasley over Turner and Turner was #2.

Would you trade Beasley for anyone in the draft last year not named John Wall?

Nope.

Riley kind of made a mistake drafting Beasley, because right after 2008 draft lottery, when Heat found out that they got #2 overall pick, they were going to get OJ Mayo. Their real target was Rose though.

I remember thinking how pathetic that season was. They basically benched anyone decent for scrubs from the D-League and their coach didn't even bother to turn up to games down the stretch, instead preferring to scout Derrick Rose. I was so happy when karma gave them the big middle finger, just like it's doing now.

Would Rose and Wade really have worked better than Wade/Beasley?

I kinda doubt it considering Wade/Rose are kinda ball dominant guards.

jade_hippo · Post #16 » by **jade_hippo** » Thu Nov 18, 2010 11:03 pm

I totally agree Wade/Rose would be awful together in the long run, neither seems to have the prerogative to move without the ball for positioning and defense exploitation or even dead-eye shooters that "second bananas" seem to do like Reggie Miller, Ray Allen, Rip Hamilton types. They need the ball to create and need it in high volumes.

I totally thought this would have been Klomped by now just like WormGuts...

horaceworthy · Post #17 » by **horaceworthy** » Thu Nov 18, 2010 11:22 pm

jade_hippo wrote:I totally thought this would have been Klomped by now just like WormGuts...

Would Klomp Klomp his own thread? How many threads would a ModKlomp Klomp if a ModKlomp could Klomp threads?

shangrila · Post #18 » by **shangrila** » Thu Nov 18, 2010 11:34 pm

horaceworthy wrote:
jade_hippo wrote:I totally thought this would have been Klomped by now just like WormGuts...

Would Klomp Klomp his own thread? How many threads would a ModKlomp Klomp if a ModKlomp could Klomp threads?

Post #19 » by **C.lupus** » Fri Nov 19, 2010 12:11 am

Klomp is now a verb. I like it.

Post #20 » by **Klomp** » Fri Nov 19, 2010 4:17 am

C.lupus wrote:Klomp is now a verb. I like it.

I'm used to it in my real life too.