fishercob wrote:All in all, people are being taken in by Nick's 20-some game performance as a good scorer on a terrible team. Shades of Courtney Alexander, really.
And the Wizards got the #17 pick in the draft for Courtney Alexander.
Moderators: nate33, montestewart, LyricalRico
fishercob wrote:All in all, people are being taken in by Nick's 20-some game performance as a good scorer on a terrible team. Shades of Courtney Alexander, really.
nate33 wrote:I agree that Young is nothing like Ginobili. I disagree that one must have a well-rounded game to be anything better than an 8th or 9th man. If Young can score at a reasonably high volume and maintain his efficiency, he's a 5th or 6th man - particularly in an offense where the PG dominates the ball.
If (and it's a big if) Young continues to score like he is, we're talking about a top 6-10 scorer in the league from the SG position. Factor in his pretty good on-the-ball defense and I just don't see why he can't be a starter. He's basically a more efficient prime Rip Hamilton, but with tunnel vision.
To put it into perspective, this guy was an all-star:Code: Select all
hamilton, PTS REB AST STL BLK TO PF eFG% TS% PER
2007-08 19.5 3.7 4.7 1.1 0.2 2.1 2.7 .515 .552 18.2
2006-07 20.6 3.9 4.0 0.8 0.2 2.2 3.2 .486 .551 18.2
2005-06 21.9 3.5 3.7 0.7 0.2 2.4 2.8 .512 .553 18.2
Why is this guy a 9th man?Code: Select all
young,nic PTS REB AST STL BLK TO PF eFG% TS% PER
2010-11 20.7 3.2 0.9 0.9 0.5 1.2 2.6 .530 .568 17.0
3 assists per game (along with one extra turnover a game) is the difference between an All-Star and a bit role player?
To me, the real question is whether or not he can maintain this scoring pace. I still have plenty of doubts.
hands11 wrote:Nivek wrote:Hamilton did that as a starter and the #1 option for his team's offense. He was the focus of the opposition's defense. Opposing coaches game-planned for him and tried to stop him. Nick is coming off the bench for a terrible team. No one game plans for him because they don't need to. Nick can score 30 and it won't change the outcome of the game because the Wizards suck. I don't believe Young would do this well as the alpha offensive player for a team with high expectations. To be blunt, his basketball IQ isn't good enough for him to adjust once defenses started gearing up to take away his favorite moves.
If Nick is starting, but not the #1 offensive option, how is he going to contribute? That puts him back on the bench, but with the same issues. If he's the 6th man, he's going to need to enter the game as that #1 option. If he's on a good team, opposing teams will game plan for him and we're right back to the same old questions: How does he contribute when he's not scoring? How will he adjust when good defensive teams take away his pet moves?
All that is before getting to whether his improved efficiency is sustainable. I think it's not because he's shooting so many **** shots at such a high percentage. That **** shot percentage is markedly different than his shooting from that range in previous years (40%, 40%, 41% to 57%). My expectation is that the percentage will start to drop -- especially if defenses start game-planning him. And then the question becomes, how does he contribute when he's less of a scorer? We're in his 4th season now, and the answer is still the same as it was when he was a rookie.
You must have missed the Lakers game. There main focus was to try to stop Nick and the Wizard has few if any other threats on the court. Kobe took it as a personal challenge to put the kid back in the box after what he did to them the game before.
Nick still scored 20 and he was 0-4 from 3 in doing it.
What Nick needs to do to be more dominate, I have seen signs of his trying to do this year and that is rebounding, scrapping for loss balls, passing the ball when needed and for Gods sack, TAKING IT TO THE RACK.
He needs to use all of his athleticism to have the biggest impact on the game that he can. He needs to be a basketball player and not just a scorer. He has to develop that mentality that he is going to will his team to winning by whatever means necessary.

pancakes3 wrote:ouch. shot down on 3 separate posts.
i still maintain my stance, though. NEW N1 (key word NEW, 20-games in, we shouldn't believe the hype edition) is a lot closer to Manu than he is to Rip or Kobe imo. He's not the tireless, route-runner that Rip is, and he doesn't have the diverse game that Kobe does. Right now he's coming off the bench, dropping a ton of points mainly off mid ranges (pull ups at that), shooting a few 3's, and drawing a few FTs here and there. He's also playing scrappy defense, and complete off-ball. dunno... there are real shades of manu there, to me at least.
seriously? nobody else sees this? am i taking crazy pills? Kobe and Rip over Manu?
tontoz wrote:It was nice to see Nick attacking the basket last night. I wonder what brought that on.
verbal8 wrote:tontoz wrote:It was nice to see Nick attacking the basket last night. I wonder what brought that on.
Maybe he read this thread
tontoz wrote:It was nice to see Nick attacking the basket last night. I wonder what brought that on.

nate33 wrote:Don't overrate the 10 FTAs last night. The referees were calling lots of ticky tack stuff and Young got about 4 free throws simply because NJ was in the penalty.
I agree that Young's next phase of development must be to learn how to get to the free throw line, but I don't think he's there yet. If he can start drawing 8 FTA's a game, he'll be the next Kevin Martin, but with better D.
Nivek wrote:pancakes3 wrote:ouch. shot down on 3 separate posts.
i still maintain my stance, though. NEW N1 (key word NEW, 20-games in, we shouldn't believe the hype edition) is a lot closer to Manu than he is to Rip or Kobe imo. He's not the tireless, route-runner that Rip is, and he doesn't have the diverse game that Kobe does. Right now he's coming off the bench, dropping a ton of points mainly off mid ranges (pull ups at that), shooting a few 3's, and drawing a few FTs here and there. He's also playing scrappy defense, and complete off-ball. dunno... there are real shades of manu there, to me at least.
seriously? nobody else sees this? am i taking crazy pills? Kobe and Rip over Manu?
If you're watching Nick Young and he's somehow reminding you of Manu, yeah -- I think you're taking crazy pills.
nate33 wrote:Don't overrate the 10 FTAs last night. The referees were calling lots of ticky tack stuff and Young got about 4 free throws simply because NJ was in the penalty.
I agree that Young's next phase of development must be to learn how to get to the free throw line, but I don't think he's there yet. If he can start drawing 8 FTA's a game, he'll be the next Kevin Martin, but with better D.
nate33 wrote:Don't overrate the 10 FTAs last night. The referees were calling lots of ticky tack stuff and Young got about 4 free throws simply because NJ was in the penalty.
I agree that Young's next phase of development must be to learn how to get to the free throw line, but I don't think he's there yet. If he can start drawing 8 FTA's a game, he'll be the next Kevin Martin, but with better D.
no D in Hibachi wrote:With the Arenas deal pretty close I think N1 is the most likely benefactor. He'll be starting now and probably have the featured role on offense--even if Wall returns, big IF. I could see him putting up big numbers if for no other reason he's probably the only player capable of taking on a bigger scoring role in Gil's absence.