Post Game Thread: Tough Loss but it's just ONE L at the end

SpongeWorthy · Post #261 » by **SpongeWorthy** » Sat Dec 25, 2010 8:51 pm

Boozer has been here for several years?

Titleist · Post #262 » by **Titleist** » Sat Dec 25, 2010 8:52 pm

SMAC-K wrote:
Rerisen wrote:The reasons were pretty clearly understandable. If you can't get them then you are probably being blinded by homerism.

The Bulls have beat good teams too. Denver, Dallas, Lakers, OKC, several of those missing Carlos Boozer.

The facts are the Bulls have faced tougher opponents overall and are beating teams by bigger margins on average than the Knicks despite that.

Ok here I can make excuses too

Bulls core has had more time to build chemistry because their main pieces have been together for several years while the Knicks core is playing for the first time this year after being retooled this summer

wow that was so easy

Fail. Try again.

Bogans new, Boozer new, Asik new, Korver new, Kurt Thomas new, CJ new, Brewer new.

Wow very easy indeed.

Fabo · Post #263 » by **Fabo** » Sat Dec 25, 2010 8:53 pm

Noah is out, the Knicks are actually a good team (I know, very surprising) but hey we beat the Lakers couple of weeks ago so the Knicks don't mean **** to me. Let them make all the noise they want, at the end of the day this is regular season.

I don't think Detroit is aware that tomorrow they are going to become a punching bag for the Bulls.

Post #264 » by **Rerisen** » Sat Dec 25, 2010 8:53 pm

SMAC-K wrote:Ok here I can make excuses too

Bulls core has had more time to build chemistry because their main pieces have been together for several years while the Knicks core is playing for the first time this year after being retooled this summer

wow that was so easy

Actually no that doesn't make one bit of sense. The Bulls have 8 new faces this year, 7 that are in the main rotation. With only a couple games to this point where they've all even been together at the same time.

Come back if your team passes the Bulls in the standings, especially after the Knicks actually play a few tougher opponents in a row. Then we can have a discussion where you might have a leg to stand on.

Post #265 » by **DJhitek** » Sat Dec 25, 2010 8:53 pm

The ROY wrote:Best part about this, it seems to me both teams are renewing the rivalry to an extent and thats wonderful IMO.

Nice hard fouling Amare...the league is boring...

NY vs Chi is good for sports in general...

BTW....stop acting like girls and whining because another teams fans talk trash. MODs MODS please BAN THEM! LOL It's all in good fun man..its just sports...that dude BJ's posts are reading like he's crying behind the monitor. Dude made numerous threats in the game thread..thats ok?

Anyway....Bulls had a pretty bad game...The Knicks are clearly the more athletic team....Pringles system is lethal when he has the right players..

Im praying we meet them in the first round...What a wonderful series it would be..

Landry Fields is nice...today was my first time really seeing him.

Brewer shoulda dunked that ****. Blowing a wide open gimmie...in MSG...on Christmas? Embarrassing.

Hope everyone here contines to have a blessed day.

Happy B-day Jesus

Do us a favor than, go to the Knicks board and talk some trash for us? I'm sure they won't mind at all.

HEZI · Post #266 » by **HEZI** » Sat Dec 25, 2010 8:54 pm

SpongeWorthy wrote:Boozer has been here for several years?

Rose, Noah, Deng

Everybody will tell you that the hardest transition in basketball is for Point Guards. Our PG needed to learn a new system while having his role expanded. We also have a rookie starter in Landry Fields while the Bulls have all veterans.

You see I can go on and on but at the end of the day these are just excuses

BeKuK · Post #267 » by **BeKuK** » Sat Dec 25, 2010 8:54 pm

Rerisen wrote:
SMAC-K wrote:Ok here I can make excuses too

Bulls core has had more time to build chemistry because their main pieces have been together for several years while the Knicks core is playing for the first time this year after being retooled this summer

wow that was so easy

Actually no that doesn't make one bit of sense. The Bulls have 8 new faces this year, 7 that are in the main rotation. With only a couple games to this point where they've all even been together at the same time.

Come back if your team passes the Bulls in the standings, especially now that the Knicks will actually be playing some tougher teams in a row. Then we can have a discussion where you might have a leg to stand on.

and they played the first game without Boozer and the second without Noah!!

SeniorWalker · Post #268 » by **SeniorWalker** » Sat Dec 25, 2010 8:54 pm

SMAC-K wrote:Ok here I can make excuses too

Bulls core has had more time to build chemistry because their main pieces have been together for several years while the Knicks core is playing for the first time this year after being retooled this summer

wow that was so easy

There are at least 7 new players on the team this year.

Fabo · Post #269 » by **Fabo** » Sat Dec 25, 2010 8:55 pm

btw Merry Christmas everyone!

SpongeWorthy · Post #270 » by **SpongeWorthy** » Sat Dec 25, 2010 8:56 pm

SMAC-K wrote:
SpongeWorthy wrote:Boozer has been here for several years?

Rose, Noah, Deng

Everybody will tell you that the hardest transition in basketball is for Point Guards. Our PG needed to learn a new system while having his role expanded. We also have a rookie starter in Landry Fields while the Bulls have all veterans.

You see I can go on and on but at the end of the day these are just excuses

Noah played today?

If you wanted to point out why one team would be considered better than another being because its core has been around each other for longer and have good chemistry I don't think anyone would disagree with you. It's a perfectly valid point.

Post #271 » by **Rerisen** » Sat Dec 25, 2010 8:56 pm

SMAC-K wrote:You see I can go on and on but at the end of the day these are just excuses

Go look at the standings and see if your team is higher or lower than the Bulls.

Everything else is just excuses right? :wink:

jl342323 · Post #272 » by **jl342323** » Sat Dec 25, 2010 8:56 pm

SMAC-K wrote:
SpongeWorthy wrote:Boozer has been here for several years?

Rose, Noah, Deng

Everybody will tell you that the hardest transition in basketball is for Point Guards. Our PG needed to learn a new system while having his role expanded. We also have a rookie starter in Landry Fields while the Bulls have all veterans.

You see I can go on and on but at the end of the day these are just excuses

u do know we had a coaching change right?

ragas2134 · Post #273 » by **ragas2134** » Sat Dec 25, 2010 8:57 pm

dreamwalker87 wrote:
SMAC-K wrote:Ok here I can make excuses too

Bulls core has had more time to build chemistry because their main pieces have been together for several years while the Knicks core is playing for the first time this year after being retooled this summer

wow that was so easy

There are at least 7 new players on the team this year.

Not to mention a NEW COACH with a completely different system.

My god what a dumb argument.

HEZI · Post #274 » by **HEZI** » Sat Dec 25, 2010 8:58 pm

What going to be next? Chicago weather has colder winds so that impacts their ability to make shots because of the draft that comes in their building? Cmon, stop with the excuses Bulls fans.

You guys aint better, we are clearly on the same level right now, just deal with it

Post #275 » by **DJhitek** » Sat Dec 25, 2010 8:58 pm

BTW, by the shot chart Rose took 7 shots past 16 feet. He was getting to the paint almost at will, in those cases I'm ok with him taking that many shots. He had like 5 shots blocks alone. It's the old rehashed argument about learning to take contact instead of throwing the shot up as quickly as you can.

jl342323 · Post #276 » by **jl342323** » Sat Dec 25, 2010 8:58 pm

haha this is great, this troll is making himself look like a (Please Use More Appropriate Word) with every posts.

Chrome · Post #277 » by **Chrome** » Sat Dec 25, 2010 8:59 pm

Stephen Jackson time. Get it done GarPax!

HEZI · Post #278 » by **HEZI** » Sat Dec 25, 2010 8:59 pm

jl342323 wrote:u do know we had a coaching change right?

All your doing is proving how long this argument can go when your willing to search for excuses

:wink:

Post #279 » by **Rerisen** » Sat Dec 25, 2010 9:00 pm

SMAC-K wrote:You guys aint better, we are clearly on the same level right now, just deal with it

You don't seem to be convincing anyone here. I'm sure you'll find more acceptance on the Knicks board though.

HEZI · Post #280 » by **HEZI** » Sat Dec 25, 2010 9:00 pm

Rerisen wrote:
SMAC-K wrote:You see I can go on and on but at the end of the day these are just excuses

Go look at the standings and see if your team is higher or lower than the Bulls.

Everything else is just excuses right?

18-10 vs 18-12

You guys are clearly better and far superior to us

I mean clearly its all there in the record

0-2 in season matchup and one game away from an identical record

good job