ImageImageImageImageImage

McGee

Moderators: montestewart, LyricalRico, nate33

User avatar
DaRealHibachi
Veteran
Posts: 2,864
And1: 173
Joined: Apr 11, 2008
Location: Rebuild..?? What Rebuild..??

Re: McGee 

Post#21 » by DaRealHibachi » Thu Dec 30, 2010 12:27 am

retrolenny wrote:You Washington fans think Daye and a conditional 1st round pick from Det is not enough for McGee? Maybe it should be Stuck, Prince and 3 first round picks for McGee... You guys crack me up!!!


Make it 4 picks and we might consider...
:beer: Magnumt
User avatar
mohammed10
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,857
And1: 155
Joined: May 26, 2007
Location: Playoffs? Playoffs? Yes, playoffs dammit
 

Re: McGee 

Post#22 » by mohammed10 » Thu Dec 30, 2010 1:54 am

Not to be a Debby Downer, but don't we have a trade thread for this?

IBTL
If you can fill the unforgiving minute
With sixty seconds’ worth of distance run,
Yours is the Earth and everything that’s in it,
And—which is more—you’ll be a Man, my son!

'If' - by Rudyard Kipling
User avatar
pancakes3
General Manager
Posts: 9,581
And1: 3,012
Joined: Jul 27, 2003
Location: Virginia
Contact:

Re: McGee 

Post#23 » by pancakes3 » Thu Dec 30, 2010 2:00 am

do detroit fans really have THAT much stock put in austin daye? he's not even better than al thornton and he's... 3rd on our sf depth chart.
Bullets -> Wizards
User avatar
sfam
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,462
And1: 548
Joined: Aug 03, 2007
         

Re: McGee 

Post#24 » by sfam » Thu Dec 30, 2010 3:17 am

retrolenny wrote:You Washington fans think Daye and a conditional 1st round pick from Det is not enough for McGee? Maybe it should be Stuck, Prince and 3 first round picks for McGee... You guys crack me up!!!


Austin "Defenseless" Daye? Why exactly would we want him again? The Wizards, for the first time ever that they've had that name (instead of Bullets), have started playing defense. While McGee gets lost on D, he at least swats bunches of balls, and still has enough potential that we can all hope he gets a clue a some point in the near future.

What exactly would Daye bring us?
User avatar
dangermouse
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,628
And1: 814
Joined: Dec 08, 2009

Re: McGee 

Post#25 » by dangermouse » Thu Dec 30, 2010 3:19 am

If the condition of the pick was that it was top 1 protected, i would still feel like an idiot if i pulled the trigger.
Image
long suffrin' boulez fan wrote:
NatP4 wrote:but why would the pacers want Mahinmi's contract


Well, in fairness, we took Mike Pence off their hands. Taking back Mahinmi is the least they can do.
verbal8
General Manager
Posts: 8,352
And1: 1,377
Joined: Jul 20, 2006
Location: Herndon, VA
     

Re: McGee 

Post#26 » by verbal8 » Thu Dec 30, 2010 12:11 pm

sfam wrote:
retrolenny wrote:You Washington fans think Daye and a conditional 1st round pick from Det is not enough for McGee? Maybe it should be Stuck, Prince and 3 first round picks for McGee... You guys crack me up!!!


Austin "Defenseless" Daye? Why exactly would we want him again? The Wizards, for the first time ever that they've had that name (instead of Bullets), have started playing defense. While McGee gets lost on D, he at least swats bunches of balls, and still has enough potential that we can all hope he gets a clue a some point in the near future.

What exactly would Daye bring us?


I think Wizards fans see Daye as the second coming of ared effries. Daye is a better offensive player, but there are some similarities. If Daye came to the Wizards he would be behind Josh Howard on the depth chart, rather than being behind TMac. I don't think his value is anywhere close to McGee.
dukeknicksirish
Analyst
Posts: 3,168
And1: 2,449
Joined: Nov 02, 2010
 

Re: McGee 

Post#27 » by dukeknicksirish » Thu Dec 30, 2010 2:24 pm

McGee for Anthony Randolph
User avatar
pancakes3
General Manager
Posts: 9,581
And1: 3,012
Joined: Jul 27, 2003
Location: Virginia
Contact:

Re: McGee 

Post#28 » by pancakes3 » Thu Dec 30, 2010 2:28 pm

you may have the most offensive name in all the internet, unless there's a dukeheatirish floating around out there somewhere as well...
Bullets -> Wizards
ray ray
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,968
And1: 762
Joined: Jan 20, 2007
Location: Where the Sun will raise!

Re: McGee 

Post#29 » by ray ray » Thu Dec 30, 2010 2:42 pm

Robin Lopez and the Suns 1st round pick conditional for JaValee McGee. ( the condition is if the Suns pick is in the top 10, then they get Orlando's 2011 1st round pick and the Suns 2011 2nd round pick)

Your thoughts?
User avatar
Hoopalotta
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,937
And1: 3
Joined: Jun 27, 2009

Re: McGee 

Post#30 » by Hoopalotta » Thu Dec 30, 2010 2:46 pm

ray ray wrote:Robin Lopez and the Suns 1st round pick conditional for JaValee McGee. ( the condition is if the Suns pick is in the top 10, then they get Orlando's 2011 1st round pick and the Suns 2011 2nd round pick)

Your thoughts?


Automated response:

:spam: :spam: :spam: :spam: :spam: :spam: :spam: :spam: :spam: :spam: :spam: :spam:

According to two Western Conference executives, Wizards are gauging interest in Andray Blatche to determine if trading the skilled 6-foot-11 forward is best for the organization moving forward.

"JaVale seems very not available," one of the executives said.


http://voices.washingtonpost.com/wizard ... latch.html

:spam: :spam: :spam: :spam: :spam: :spam: :spam: :spam: :spam: :spam: :spam: :spam:
Image
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: McGee 

Post#31 » by Ruzious » Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:15 pm

No need to kick up a fuss, Hoop; I'll have your Spam. I love it! I'm having Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, baked beans, Spam, Spam, Spam and Spam!

Glad to hear that it seems the Wiz asking price is extra high for Javale. With Andray, it's a roller-coaster. With the fans booing him early on, I would have guessed he was getting closer to being traded, but with the way he stepped up during the game, I think the odds of him getting dealt went way down.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
User avatar
Hoopalotta
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,937
And1: 3
Joined: Jun 27, 2009

Re: McGee 

Post#32 » by Hoopalotta » Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:27 pm

I am of course the spammer in this scenario with my response as I certainly don't begrudge anyone for seeing the wiretap and asking what it would take to get McGee. We'd be doing the same thing if the roles were reversed. But I plastered that thing all over the T&T board, so I'm spamming it out.
Image
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: McGee 

Post#33 » by Ruzious » Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:31 pm

In that case, could I have egg, bacon, Spam and sausage - without the Spam?
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
Zonkerbl
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 9,014
And1: 4,705
Joined: Mar 24, 2010
       

Re: McGee 

Post#34 » by Zonkerbl » Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:34 pm

keynote wrote:
Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:Kobe is the prototype. NBA player pops with prodigee son. Son's usually better.

Luke Walton is an exception. :) So is Marcus Jordan (though he might make an NBA team, watch and see).


As are the Barry boys - all of 'em. And Damien Wilkins. And Pat Ewing Jr. And Danny Schayes.

Frankly, I think it's a toss-up at best as to whether the son of a famous baller will outshine his dad. Kobe and Curry are clearly better than their pops, but there aren't many more in that category. And, there are quite a few guys who were comparable to or worse than their dads in their respective primes.

From a NYTimes article back in March 2009:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/24/sport ... cebox.html


Kareem Abdul Jabbar Jr. Good kid though, don't mean to criticize or anything.
I've been taught all my life to value service to the weak and powerless.
User avatar
Illuminaire
Veteran
Posts: 2,970
And1: 606
Joined: Jan 04, 2010
 

Re: McGee 

Post#35 » by Illuminaire » Thu Dec 30, 2010 5:58 pm

I'm not sure the Barry evaluation is as easy as looking at the stats... there were some significant era differences between when they played versus when their dad did. Eh, nah, none of them rocked the underhand freethrows... obviously they suck. =D

Return to Washington Wizards