knicks742 wrote:Well guys let's put ourselves in their position. Let's say Amar'e was going to be a free agent right now and he wanted to go to Orlando. However, they weren't offering the best package, wouldn't you guys expect our front office to do everything in their power to get the best offer including waiting until the trade deadline to see who blinks first (Melo for his extension, Knicks putting in a better offer, Denver getting what they can that is better than what they can get in a sign and trade over the summer). Personally, I don't have a problem with them taking as long as they possibly can before having to trade him which is still option B. Option A remains resigning him until he specifically tells them he won't, which he hasn't done yet.
I definetely would expect us to try to get the best we could. However, i'd be more pissed if we didnt get anything back at all. its a thin line. Play the game but at the end of the day you have to know when you have to settle. When losing someone like Melo or Amare, lets get one thing straight you are settling, but you want to put your team in the best possible situation.
Denver is doing what they should, i agree with that. However, IF (and we dont know yet) he really ONLY wants NY and is willing to wait till the offseason, then Denver would be stupid not to get the best deal possible from NY. You take Chandler and or Gallo and AR and expirings and picks if you can get it, and you move on from there. IF the Knicks dont give you that, retool and try a little less maybe AR and Gallo or AR and Wilson plus Curry and picks or something like that. Get the most you can, but get something you owe it to your team and your fans.