droponov wrote:He shot inefficiently. He started shooting more because the other guys weren't doing anything at all when he was shooting 16% FG% and his post players combining for 48% FG%? Anyway, I don't think the way a team plays in the first half is a valid rationale for a player shot-hogging for pretty much an entire quarter... and leave his team in an even deeper hole - both in terms of score and momentum.
He didn't shoot much and let the game go through the other players, who didn't accomplish much of anything after the first few minutes.
The reason I'm talking about the first half is that you keep saying Kobe took the team out of rhythm after he finished... but since they were bunk even before that, it dispels the notion entirely. Given how poorly everyone but Bynum played (remember, 8/24 between those 4 guys), it wasn't a valid point.
Huh? Because he ended the first half with waht? 7 points in 6 shots? Why are you pretending that he scored a lot better than his teammates in the first half? It's bizarre.
I'm not? I'm saying that the team wasn't playing well in the first half, so Kobe's choice to shoot more in the third was a sensible one, especially given how badly outpaced they were getting because of all of the turnovers and fast-break points.
A pure distortion of the facts. It seems you're trying to say: "well, he was the only one playing well in the first half, so that justifies his attempt to take over the game even though it resulted in an ever larger scoring deficit". Not only it's a bad reasoning, it's sustained in a fiction.
No, and it's not my fault that you can't see the difference between that nonsense and what I actually said. I said the team as a whole was playing poorly, so what they were doing didn't work and so they needed to change something. So he did. But clearly, they needed more from others that they didn't get in any of the other 3 quarters and they needed way better defense from everyone, which they didn't get. What you're talking about, I've no idea.
- why do you believe the Lakers played bad defense?
Did you WATCH the game? They got turned upside down and butt-sexed by the Memphis fast break and their bigs...
- what the heck has bad defense to do with more FGAs for Memphis?
BWA? They were making careless passes that led to transition opportunities...
They didn't force many turnovers but that's not what Los Angeles defense is about.
Not what I was talking about. I was talking specifically about their horrendous transition defense.