dk7th wrote:Justdatdude wrote:dk7th wrote:beasley has a usage rate of almost 29% and he averages 1.8 assists a game.
that translates to a player who gets his own but doesn't make others better. i say fool's gold.
by the way that first game gallinari scored 18 points in the same first half that beasley scored 19 points when they were checking each other.
but sure beasley is a million times better.
And Beasley scored how many in the second half and Gallo scored how many in the second half/
Yes. Gallinari is inconsistent. No sarcasm.
And yes...Beasley is better than Gallinari. No argument necessary.
Here's your Gallinari and Beasley discussion topic if you want to compare the two...
viewtopic.php?f=24&t=1001677
second half of that game chandler started guarding beasley. you should be comparing chandler's second half numbers, not gallinari's, to beasley's.
i'll save you the trouble: beasley outscored chandler.
if gallinari had an almost 29% usage rate one can only wonder what he would be doing offensively every night. and defensively it's no contest. gallinari is the better defender and defense is at least half the game. most casual fans like you conveniently leave that out habitually.
"better" is a matter of opinion unless you can create similar contexts-- and because you can't your just guessing, aside from the fact you have admitted you just don't like gallinari. not only that but "better" is virtually meaningless in a team sport. individual sports, sure. but not team sports.
i don't know who is "better," but i do know whose game translates better to winning as of right now.
that is why I asked, better at what? he is not a better "basketball player" than gallo.. gallo is a "basketball player". beasley is a guy who likes to shoot the ball... and has proven that when conditions are not to his liking(as in miami) he can be a slouch..
