Post#187 » by pancakes3 » Tue Jan 4, 2011 1:20 am
well, i'll just come out and write in full caps - SPOILERS SPOILERS SPOILERS - because i want to discuss this with BA and Doc (and anyone else who's watched it).
SPOILERS
while i agree that the "ending" was manufactured and prank-ish, everything up until where banksy saw the 1st draft of thierry's video seemed to be genuine. i think thierry existed before banksy, and really was just a weirdo who liked to film anything and everything, and somehow ingratiated himself into the street art community.
i'm pretty sure banksy had some idea that theirry was a no-talent clown but gave him the benefit of doubt because he was harmless, loyal, and enthusiastic. however, once the rough draft came out (i bet it wasn't even edited. i can honestly see thierry being THAT bad and THAT lacking in artistic vision) it became clear that if anyone was going to make a movie showing what street art was all about, it had to be banksy. then the scissors met the tape and a huge amount of editing took place, not to mention banksy himself creating new footage like the interviews, the palestine footage, newsreels, etc.
i think doc liked the thierry half better since it gave a better view of how the real art was made, and the measures it took. BA, you seem to like the social commentary aspect of it, and how easily the masses could be suckered into not telling the narrow differences between an imitator and the genuine article.
i have a question that's been bugging me and is probably unanswerable, though. banksy needs bankroll to do what he does. plane tickets, flatbed trucks, elephant rentals, movie productions... etc. i mean he's not paying for this with counterfeit bills. where does he and his crack team get their financial backing from? an anonymous patron? is banksy independently wealthy and using his trust fund to make art instead of sailing off the french riviera? did he hit the lotto? insurance fraud? is he up to his eyeballs in debt? the world may never know.
Bullets -> Wizards