Knickz4life88 wrote:
thats has to be the most (Please Use More Appropriate Word) comment i have ever seen...take away any teams number 1 guy and the team wont be good you idiot..take away kobe the lakers aint a great or even good team..take away kevin durant the thunder aint a good team take away lopez and maybe the nets dont even have a win at this point LOL...the knicks have a rookie of the yr candidate and if not for griffin he might of had a good chance to win it..arguably an all star point guard in raymond felton..a MUCH improved guy and possibly all star with great numbers in chandler..oh and the knicks are a nice amount of games ABOVE 500...Who does your nets have? a center that cant grab 7 rebounds a game..a toronto scrub whos playing great cuz of how bad you guys are doing..Nets are nowhere near as good as the knicks even without Amare..why would Carmelo sign on this..he's better off to stay in denver then going to nj
Actually, your grammar has to be the most (Please Use More Appropriate Word) thing you've ever seen. The Knicks are just good cause they have Amare. If the Nets get Melo they can do the same meaning its not like the Knicks are some elite team.
Oh and your bias is unbelievable. The Thunder and Lakers would still be GREAT teams if you took away Durant and Kobe. Rookie of the year candidate your joking right? Fields doesn't touch Griffin and hes not at Wall's level either.
All start point guard? Chandler a possible all star?
There's such a difference between reality and the world in the minds of Knick fans. Why would he come to NY rather than Denver?
You think NY has ANY chance to do better in the eat than Denver does? They will NEVER touch the Celtics, Heat, or maybe even the Magic. He wants a change of scenery and he's from Brooklyn. The Nets are a very logical choice.
They have a new arena, the richest sports team owner in the world, and multiple draft picks to get better.