MSGLegendNY wrote:MarJJMar wrote:The Knicks shouldn't even try to get Melo.
Seiously, Amare+Melo is not a good combo. Melo will take touches away from area and likes to score in areas Amare likes to play as well.
Besides you are already set at all positions except center. There is no need to add Melo really. Felton, Fields, Chandler and Amare thats 4 starters right there better get a center because you won't win a thing with gimmick small ball lineups in the long run.
Even though it seems like we won't get Melo, don't act like Melo wouldn't have helped our team. He would of been another key piece for us getting closer to contend.
I wanted Melo but, and I said this from the get-go, this idea that he's even close to lebron is absurd. He's not even close.
And watching him more closely this year, his ups are very disappointing. He gets blocked because he attacks the rim AND because he doesn't have good lift. That's a concern. So is his volume shooting and poor 3-point %.
And having watched Amar'e more closely this year, for obvious reasons, I think this guy is correct that he and Melo operate in similar areas of the court and are similar type scorers: mid-range jumpers and attacking the glass.
Nothing wrong with pointing that out. Again, Melo is no lebron. Not even close.
To be fair, if I could flip a switch, I'd probably still flip it for Melo because of the star power that would go with having two prime scorers. But if the Knicks can add a center and still keep Chandler, I wouldn't be too confident saying that this path ... our next Plan B ... won't work better than the Melo path.
That's simply my point. Melo is not lebron and losing him, while keeping our depth of young talent, could turn out to be a blessing in disguise.