ophdog wrote:KnicksGod wrote:knicks9784 wrote:
see my only problem with a definition like that is you're describing a hall of famer. why use the term franchise player when you're actually describing a hall of fame player.
Well, if a franchise player needs another top player next to him, then he's not a player who makes your franchise all by himself. He's a "co-franchise player" at best and that's a fair way to describe both Amar'e and Melo probably.
HTis is what my response was LArry, Michael and MAgic anll had top players around them
Here is my criteria. If a player fits it, he is probably franchise.
1. Can you run the offense through him?
2. Does he make his teammates better?
3. Can you count on him to get a bucket when you need it?
4. Has he proven it in the playoffs?
Those players all fit my criteria, so they are all franchise players





















