Hitman33 wrote:I am so sick of this Carmelo Anthony saga it is ridiculous.
It would be one of the happiest moments of my sports watching life to see him sign with the Nets.
But I just don't see that happening.
stfu ang gtfo.
Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
Hitman33 wrote:I am so sick of this Carmelo Anthony saga it is ridiculous.
It would be one of the happiest moments of my sports watching life to see him sign with the Nets.
But I just don't see that happening.
?soby22 wrote:Hitman33 wrote:I am so sick of this Carmelo Anthony saga it is ridiculous.
It would be one of the happiest moments of my sports watching life to see him sign with the Nets.
But I just don't see that happening.
stfu ang gtfo.
Hitman33 wrote:soby22 wrote:Hitman33 wrote:I am so sick of this Carmelo Anthony saga it is ridiculous.
It would be one of the happiest moments of my sports watching life to see him sign with the Nets.
But I just don't see that happening.
stfu ang gtfo.
Ummm, no.
Thanks though.
Childs2Dudley wrote:I have stated time and time again that we do not need Carmelo Anthony to be successful. If we added another very good big man to the lineup (Camby) we would be a top 4 team in the East. All Carmelo does is offer scoring. Is he a better players than Chandler? Yes. But Chandler plays better defense and rebounds the ball better. Melo is also shooting poorly from 3 this season while Wilson is having the best shooting year of his young career.
I don't know if I'd give up Chandler, Gallinari/Landry, Curry, AR, Azubuike for Carmelo Anthony and Al Harrington. How does that really make us a complete team? That just wastes all our assets on one guy and gives us Al's **** self and contract in return.
I would like to get Carmelo too but I would like to get him in the summer as a free agent. I do not want to trade most of our valuable assets to acquire a guy who will not help us in our critical need of low post defense and rebounding.
JD21 wrote:Childs2Dudley wrote:I have stated time and time again that we do not need Carmelo Anthony to be successful. If we added another very good big man to the lineup (Camby) we would be a top 4 team in the East. All Carmelo does is offer scoring. Is he a better players than Chandler? Yes. But Chandler plays better defense and rebounds the ball better. Melo is also shooting poorly from 3 this season while Wilson is having the best shooting year of his young career.
I don't know if I'd give up Chandler, Gallinari/Landry, Curry, AR, Azubuike for Carmelo Anthony and Al Harrington. How does that really make us a complete team? That just wastes all our assets on one guy and gives us Al's **** self and contract in return.
I would like to get Carmelo too but I would like to get him in the summer as a free agent. I do not want to trade most of our valuable assets to acquire a guy who will not help us in our critical need of low post defense and rebounding.
Chandler is a better rebounder than Melo? You buggin on that one!
?Childs2Dudley wrote:
Actually yes.
I know you. You're a troll who was clowning the Knicks before the season started. You said the Nets would be a good team while the Knicks would do jack. Well, you can kindly STFU and GTFO now.
Hitman33 wrote:Childs2Dudley wrote:
Actually yes.
I know you. You're a troll who was clowning the Knicks before the season started. You said the Nets would be a good team while the Knicks would do jack. Well, you can kindly STFU and GTFO now.
Actually, no. You don't know what the hell you are talking about. I have never said anything remotely close to that.
You can STFU and GTFO now.
Holy crap, I can type those acronyms too!
Childs2Dudley wrote:
Yes you did. Here, but mostly in AIM chat rooms. Don't play dumb and don't attempt to be witty because you fail hard at it.
You're a troll and a dbag who has been trolling here long enough. Take your Net fan self back to the deserted Nets board.
Hitman33 wrote:Childs2Dudley wrote:
Yes you did. Here, but mostly in AIM chat rooms. Don't play dumb and don't attempt to be witty because you fail hard at it.
You're a troll and a dbag who has been trolling here long enough. Take your Net fan self back to the deserted Nets board.
AIM chat rooms? Are you insane? You have no idea what you are talking about.
I have been on this site since 2003, son. In that time, I have N-E-V-E-R posted anything in support of the Nets.
In fact, I have rarely ever posted anything about the Nets at all.
&
I don't go into AOL chat rooms. I guess you do.
Have fun in your AOL chat rooms.

Hitman33 wrote:^^^^^^^^^^
Why did you reply to this thread
viewtopic.php?t=1059771
with
"Someone should delete this thread."
about 4 posts down.
You are the troll, it seems.
I knew this team would be good and I called it.
Early.
Childs2Dudley wrote:Hitman33 wrote:^^^^^^^^^^
Why did you reply to this thread
viewtopic.php?t=1059771
with
"Someone should delete this thread."
about 4 posts down.
You are the troll, it seems.
I knew this team would be good and I called it.
Early.
1. You made the thread to make Knick fans look bad and crazy, as they are usually perceived on RealGM.
2. There was a guy on AIM - when I used it months ago - that had your exact screen name and claimed to be a Nets fan who posted on RealGM. How many Hitman23's exist on this planet?
3. You're still wrong with most of your "predictions" and some were not anything anyone else didn't know would happen.
Hitman33 wrote:Childs2Dudley wrote:Hitman33 wrote:^^^^^^^^^^
Why did you reply to this thread
viewtopic.php?t=1059771
with
"Someone should delete this thread."
about 4 posts down.
You are the troll, it seems.
I knew this team would be good and I called it.
Early.
1. You made the thread to make Knick fans look bad and crazy, as they are usually perceived on RealGM.
2. There was a guy on AIM - when I used it months ago - that had your exact screen name and claimed to be a Nets fan who posted on RealGM. How many Hitman23's exist on this planet?
3. You're still wrong with most of your "predictions" and some were not anything anyone else didn't know would happen.
1. What? Are you smoking too much weed or something? What in the blue hell are you talking about?
2. My screen name is Hitman33 not Himan23, and in a planet of 6 billion people, and considering you can't register the name "Hitman" by itself on most sites, I would assume a lot. Wouldn't you?
Do you understand math?
3. Ummm, ok.

Childs2Dudley wrote:How many Hitman23's exist on this planet?
duetta wrote:Childs2Dudley wrote:How many Hitman23's exist on this planet?
How many Don Mattingly fans do you think are still around?
