ImageImageImageImageImage

Game Thread: Wizards @ Milwaukee (1-19-11)

Moderators: montestewart, LyricalRico, nate33

closg00
RealGM
Posts: 24,434
And1: 4,435
Joined: Nov 21, 2004

Re: Game Thread: Wizards @ Milwaukee (1-19-11) 

Post#261 » by closg00 » Thu Jan 20, 2011 7:48 pm

Kanyewest wrote:
closg00 wrote:
You didn't read all of the posts. Bottom-line, If Yi is making shots and Lewis isn't... and we are losing, bumping Yi up from 13 min to 20 and shaving-off 4-5 min from Lewis should be a no-brainer considering this is a jump-shooting offense and team anyway.

btw, I mentioned it earlier in the thread, we had our biggest lead and were dominating, when we were out-scoring the Bucks in the paint. When we went back to jump-shooting and we went-cold, it was over for us.


Considering that Lewis was shooting at least 50% in each of his last 5 games, and Yi doesn't bring as many things to the table as Lewis (he's significantly worse in passing, finishing around the basket, and I can't see Yi being any better at defending small forwards).

Of course if Lewis shoots 30% (he shots 3-11 from the field) consistently, Yi will get his chance. But to ake that decision last night isn't as easy as your making it out to be since Lewis was shooting a fg% of 55-60 fg% in the previous 5 games


Most of the time you stick with Lewis, he was just especially bad last night.
fugop
Veteran
Posts: 2,744
And1: 9
Joined: Aug 09, 2004

Re: Game Thread: Wizards @ Milwaukee (1-19-11) 

Post#262 » by fugop » Thu Jan 20, 2011 8:51 pm

The only thing surprising about the loss was that we were good, even dominant, in the 1st Q. We had active hands on defense and attacked the basket on offense.

We forced turnovers, 4-5 in the first six minutes of Q1, much of it Blatche swiping at interior passes and Wall jumping the passing lanes. On offense, we converted turnovers into break opportunities, passed well in traffic, and hit our jump shots.

Going for steals, like we initially did successfully, is a high risk move. The same moves failed when Boykins was the primariy ballhandler. The interior passing on offense is similarly high risk/high skill. It's great that Blatche can throw no-look passes to Lewis on the baseline. They aren't going to convert at a high enough percentage. Same with the jumpshots. The team's performance regressed to the mean.

We were doing well in the 1st quarter because our risky play was paying off. We aren't good enough, or mature enough, to sustain that conversion on the road.
User avatar
Chocolate City Jordanaire
RealGM
Posts: 54,518
And1: 10,288
Joined: Aug 05, 2001
       

Re: Game Thread: Wizards @ Milwaukee (1-19-11) 

Post#263 » by Chocolate City Jordanaire » Thu Jan 20, 2011 9:11 pm

Nivek wrote:
Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:WD, I believe Flip consistently leaves stagnant lineups on the court on the road. Wall is not a game closer. Hinrich is not a closer. Lewis is not a closer. Blatche generally does not finish strong. Where I agree with WD is that McGee has no post game. Flip uses Javale for defense only and I think this allows opponents to double Blatche. The Wizards have no success on the road because they rely on jump shooters who can't draw fouls or hit big shots and they have no bigs that get to the rim.


I'm struggling to understand what you're saying. Flip is at fault for leaving stagnant lineups on the court on the road. Wall, Hinrich, Lewis and Blatche are not "closers." Aside from playing Nick Young 1-on-5, what options does Flip have? Those are his best players. Does anyone seriously think a lineup of Young, Martin, Booker, Seraphin and Thornton are going to "close" out a game successfully?

The Wizards haven't won a game on the road because they don't have good NBA players.

Go back and see who was on the court when Wittman coached. The Wizards blew a team out in the fourth using said players. Nivek, I do have a reason for saying this--I have seen them play well and finish strong.

Best players are not best all 48 minutes. Best players are not necessarily big shot makers or finishers or hustle players late. Flip loses because he is really predictable and his methods and thinking are fixed and rigid. Washington would be MUCH better with the right guys on the court at the end.
Tre Johnson is the future of the Wizards.
closg00
RealGM
Posts: 24,434
And1: 4,435
Joined: Nov 21, 2004

Re: Game Thread: Wizards @ Milwaukee (1-19-11) 

Post#264 » by closg00 » Thu Jan 20, 2011 9:17 pm

The re-broadcast on League Pass is blacked-out :evil:
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 20,250
And1: 5,029
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

Re: Game Thread: Wizards @ Milwaukee (1-19-11) 

Post#265 » by tontoz » Thu Jan 20, 2011 9:50 pm

closg00 wrote:The re-broadcast on League Pass is blacked-out :evil:



Do you live in the DC area? If so that is why. They don't broadcast local games on LP.

If you don't live in the DC area then i have no clue what is going on.
"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
User avatar
Chocolate City Jordanaire
RealGM
Posts: 54,518
And1: 10,288
Joined: Aug 05, 2001
       

Re: Game Thread: Wizards @ Milwaukee (1-19-11) 

Post#266 » by Chocolate City Jordanaire » Thu Jan 20, 2011 11:13 pm

closg00 wrote:The re-broadcast on League Pass is blacked-out :evil:

Not here. I saw it. Wiz looked really good the first 2 1/2 quarters. Blatche looks a whole lot better.

I didn't watch intently once Milwaukee began to pull away.
Tre Johnson is the future of the Wizards.
closg00
RealGM
Posts: 24,434
And1: 4,435
Joined: Nov 21, 2004

Re: Game Thread: Wizards @ Milwaukee (1-19-11) 

Post#267 » by closg00 » Thu Jan 20, 2011 11:46 pm

tontoz wrote:
closg00 wrote:The re-broadcast on League Pass is blacked-out :evil:



Do you live in the DC area? If so that is why. They don't broadcast local games on LP.

If you don't live in the DC area then i have no clue what is going on.


Yep, local. Next time I'll record from Fios. I did see the game, but wanted to watch the 1st quarter again.
Prince12
RealGM
Posts: 12,327
And1: 2,750
Joined: Mar 08, 2010
Contact:
     

Re: Game Thread: Wizards @ Milwaukee (1-19-11) 

Post#268 » by Prince12 » Fri Jan 21, 2011 12:54 am

Dont underestimate how disgustingly bad we were in the first quarter. Thats why weve only won 15 games we turn up with that rubbish.
@mkebucksaus just kicking off. Give it a follow!

https://twitter.com/mkebucksaus
User avatar
Nivek
Head Coach
Posts: 7,406
And1: 959
Joined: Sep 29, 2010
Contact:
         

Re: Game Thread: Wizards @ Milwaukee (1-19-11) 

Post#269 » by Nivek » Fri Jan 21, 2011 2:22 pm

Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:
Nivek wrote:
Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:WD, I believe Flip consistently leaves stagnant lineups on the court on the road. Wall is not a game closer. Hinrich is not a closer. Lewis is not a closer. Blatche generally does not finish strong. Where I agree with WD is that McGee has no post game. Flip uses Javale for defense only and I think this allows opponents to double Blatche. The Wizards have no success on the road because they rely on jump shooters who can't draw fouls or hit big shots and they have no bigs that get to the rim.


I'm struggling to understand what you're saying. Flip is at fault for leaving stagnant lineups on the court on the road. Wall, Hinrich, Lewis and Blatche are not "closers." Aside from playing Nick Young 1-on-5, what options does Flip have? Those are his best players. Does anyone seriously think a lineup of Young, Martin, Booker, Seraphin and Thornton are going to "close" out a game successfully?

The Wizards haven't won a game on the road because they don't have good NBA players.

Go back and see who was on the court when Wittman coached. The Wizards blew a team out in the fourth using said players. Nivek, I do have a reason for saying this--I have seen them play well and finish strong.

Best players are not best all 48 minutes. Best players are not necessarily big shot makers or finishers or hustle players late. Flip loses because he is really predictable and his methods and thinking are fixed and rigid. Washington would be MUCH better with the right guys on the court at the end.


First, one game proves absolutely nothing. Which you know.

Second, do you really want to hang your "crunch time" hat on Booker and Martin?

The Wizards are -21 in Booker's few crunch time minutes this season. They're 0-6 during his crunch time minutes -- outscored every time he's been on the floor during crunch time (according to 82games). The per 48 minutes numbers are preposterous -- 37.9 points per 48 minutes on offense; 435.8 per 48 allowed on defense. Obviously in limited minutes (2% of the team's crunch time minutes).

Martin's a little better -- the team is only -2 during his crunch time minutes (6% of the team's total). They're 1-3 during his crunch time minutes.

I agree with the idea of not necessarily going with the best players, but instead going with the best lineup. That would be Wall-Young-Lewis-Blatche-McGee. The coaches don't fully trust McGee yet, so Blatche moves to center and you're picking from Yi, Thornton and Martin, most likely. I'd like to see Martin get more playing time, so I'd be fine with him getting some of those minutes. What I've seen of Booker does not convince me that he's ready to play well during crunch time.
"A lot of what we call talent is the desire to practice."
-- Malcolm Gladwell

Check out my blog about the Wizards, movies, writing, music, TV, sports, and whatever else comes to mind.
User avatar
Chocolate City Jordanaire
RealGM
Posts: 54,518
And1: 10,288
Joined: Aug 05, 2001
       

Re: Game Thread: Wizards @ Milwaukee (1-19-11) 

Post#270 » by Chocolate City Jordanaire » Fri Jan 21, 2011 6:50 pm

If these coaches get fired the next bunch will do a lot better trusting McGee.
Tre Johnson is the future of the Wizards.

Return to Washington Wizards