Consider option for starting 5 (2 play makers)
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
Re: Consider option for starting 5 (2 play makers)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,511
- And1: 6,584
- Joined: Dec 21, 2009
- Location: Land of Aus
-
Re: Consider option for starting 5 (2 play makers)
The idea of two playmakers is what this system is already kind of based on, they just don't have that other wing player yet. But yeah this move would be really, really bad defensively.
Re: Consider option for starting 5 (2 play makers)
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 103
- And1: 14
- Joined: Jun 23, 2008
Re: Consider option for starting 5 (2 play makers)
we don't have any playmakers.
Re: Consider option for starting 5 (2 play makers)
- teven_1
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,201
- And1: 16
- Joined: Jun 01, 2010
Re: Consider option for starting 5 (2 play makers)
it could work...Ridnour was considered a good defender in Milwaukee, and he played some 2 guard. He also looks to score a lot. He's also our most reliable outside shooter. How would putting him off ball with a slasher like Flynn be a bad idea?
It would be a very interesting line up. Ridnour is probably a more reliable scorer than Beasley in some scenarios. I like it
It would be a very interesting line up. Ridnour is probably a more reliable scorer than Beasley in some scenarios. I like it
"Look at me. I'm running like a young deer."- Andrei Kirilenko
Re: Consider option for starting 5 (2 play makers)
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,885
- And1: 264
- Joined: Nov 13, 2010
Re: Consider option for starting 5 (2 play makers)
teven_1 wrote:it could work...Ridnour was considered a good defender in Milwaukee, and he played some 2 guard. He also looks to score a lot. He's also our most reliable outside shooter. How would putting him off ball with a slasher like Flynn be a bad idea?
It would be a very interesting line up. Ridnour is probably a more reliable scorer than Beasley in some scenarios. I like it
was considered? He sure isnt now
Re: Consider option for starting 5 (2 play makers)
- urinesane
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,012
- And1: 2,887
- Joined: May 10, 2010
-
Re: Consider option for starting 5 (2 play makers)
I really don't see why they haven't tried out Webster in the starting line up, it's not like we'll lose more games.
Re: Consider option for starting 5 (2 play makers)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,599
- And1: 24,742
- Joined: Oct 20, 2007
- Location: bird watching
- Contact:
Re: Consider option for starting 5 (2 play makers)
- Saltine
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,396
- And1: 1,002
- Joined: Jul 20, 2003
- Location: Land o' Lakes
-
Re: Consider option for starting 5 (2 play makers)
The turnovers are from Love, Beasley and Darko. Having two PG's in really won't change that... and our defense would get even worse, amazing as that sounds, lol
Re: Consider option for starting 5 (2 play makers)
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 824
- And1: 237
- Joined: Jun 27, 2010
Re: Consider option for starting 5 (2 play makers)
Those 3 are turning the ball over because they have to handle the ball more than they should. Good teams either have two capable play makers or play really good defense. Personally I don't feel this starting lineup would do very well because of the awful defense but the teams defense is already really bad and we clearly aren't competing for a playoff spot, might as well try it for a few games and see what happens.
Re: Consider option for starting 5 (2 play makers)
- Greco21
- Junior
- Posts: 277
- And1: 0
- Joined: Dec 19, 2010
- Location: Athens Greece
Re: Consider option for starting 5 (2 play makers)
bluethunder0005 wrote:Those 3 are turning the ball over because they have to handle the ball more than they should. Good teams either have two capable play makers or play really good defense. Personally I don't feel this starting lineup would do very well because of the awful defense but the teams defense is already really bad and we clearly aren't competing for a playoff spot, might as well try it for a few games and see what happens.
Exactly. And you have some conclusions before much expected Ricky Rubio crosses the Atlantic.
P.S. teven_1 Athens, Greece?
Basketball G(r)eek
Re: Consider option for starting 5 (2 play makers)
- teven_1
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,201
- And1: 16
- Joined: Jun 01, 2010
Re: Consider option for starting 5 (2 play makers)
Greco21 wrote:bluethunder0005 wrote:Those 3 are turning the ball over because they have to handle the ball more than they should. Good teams either have two capable play makers or play really good defense. Personally I don't feel this starting lineup would do very well because of the awful defense but the teams defense is already really bad and we clearly aren't competing for a playoff spot, might as well try it for a few games and see what happens.
Exactly. And you have some conclusions before much expected Ricky Rubio crosses the Atlantic.
P.S. teven_1 Athens, Greece?
speaking of Rubio, I just posted an article about him on a new thread, wont say any more about it here.
I'm down to try this lineup for 10 minutes a game, if we're playing the Lakers yeah don't put Ridnour on Kobe, but if we're playing a team with a weaker back court maybe we can get away with it. Could help Flynns confidence.
Also yeah I'm from Athens Greece, born,raised and bballed there.
"Look at me. I'm running like a young deer."- Andrei Kirilenko
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves